On 15-01-01 07:44 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
At the risk of having Theo tell me to shut up and get back to work on
things that matter, ...
and
I suppose it's inevitible that someone will want to control the world,
but I really wish you and your friends would quit lying to yourselves
about power.
I
At the risk of having Theo tell me to shut up and get back to work on
things that matter, ...
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:33 AM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:02:33 +0100
> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
>> There are dragons.
>
>> If this scares anybody, i'm not surprised; updating libraries is
>>
Quoting FRIGN :
It may be a little far-fetched, but I'm sure it would be possible
to have one package-manager for all distributions if there would just
be the motivation to distribute statically linked binaries and not fuck
things up with distribution-specific folder-structures.
I'm not a hack
On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:04:26 -0700
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Ah, another arrogance -- you came here to advertise.
Nope, if you read my first mail again, you'd see that I did not mention
our project once and only presented it to challenge your assumption that
I'm just some warrior presenting crude i
> > And who are you, and what you have you done to test and then prove
> > your thesis?
> > Absolutely nothing, I must assume.
>
> Your assumption is wrong. I am working with my colleagues from 2f30 on
> the "morpheus"-project[0] (including package-manager) and we have a set
> of static binary-pac
On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 09:37:24 -0700
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> And who are you, and what you have you done to test and then prove
> your thesis?
> Absolutely nothing, I must assume.
Your assumption is wrong. I am working with my colleagues from 2f30 on
the "morpheus"-project[0] (including package-man
And who are you, and what you have you done to test and then prove
your thesis?
Absolutely nothing, I must assume.
(BTW, your argument is weak and would be stronger if you tied it into
the faked moonlandings).
> I may get a little off-topic here and object for this very important
> topic to be d
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:02:33 +0100
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> There are dragons.
> If this scares anybody, i'm not surprised; updating libraries is
> not a playground for newbies.
> That, actually, is *terrible* advice and almost guarantees a fiasco.
> If you edit shlib_version manually, you build
8 matches
Mail list logo
