* Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org [2008-12-30 02:56]:
On 2008-12-29, Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.info wrote:
On 15:22, Mon 29 Dec 08, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Those things crash more often than windows 3.11
totally_offtopic
I'm getting a bit annoyed by statements like this.
2008/12/30 Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de:
Virtualization promises isolation, and doesn't even remotely keep
that promise, today, regardless of the implementation.
That makes it, for now, both a security and relibility disaster.
Does that also hold for VM and similar implemenations
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
2008/12/30 Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de:
Virtualization promises isolation, and doesn't even remotely keep
that promise, today, regardless of the implementation.
That makes it, for now, both a security and
Try writing hardware drivers on vmware and let me know how it went. A
good example is mpi; when we were developing that thing vmware blew up
because it couldn't respond to a configuration request. Simply put the
vitalization software only emulates certain parts of the hardware and as
soon as you
* Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net [2008-12-30 14:06]:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
2008/12/30 Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de:
Virtualization promises isolation, and doesn't even remotely keep
that promise, today, regardless of the implementation.
Still doesn't allow you to plug in cables; move cards around, insert a
cd etc. Writing/debugging drivers remotely sucks. One also doesn't get
any of the hints from the hardware like leds blinking fan noise etc.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:35:08AM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
On 12/27/2008 5:12
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
Still doesn't allow you to plug in cables; move cards around, insert a
cd etc. Writing/debugging drivers remotely sucks. One also doesn't get
any of the hints from the hardware like leds blinking fan noise etc.
Hey,
On 30/12/2008, at 7:01 AM, bofh wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Marco Peereboom
sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
Still doesn't allow you to plug in cables; move cards around,
insert a
cd etc. Writing/debugging drivers remotely sucks. One also
doesn't get
any of the hints from the
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:13 PM, David Gwynne l...@animata.net wrote:
On 30/12/2008, at 7:01 AM, bofh wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
Still doesn't allow you to plug in cables; move cards around, insert a
cd etc. Writing/debugging drivers
Those things crash more often than windows 3.11
On Dec 29, 2008, at 2:01 PM, bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Marco Peereboom
sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
Still doesn't allow you to plug in cables; move cards around,
insert a
cd etc. Writing/debugging drivers
On 15:22, Mon 29 Dec 08, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Those things crash more often than windows 3.11
totally_offtopic
I'm getting a bit annoyed by statements like this.
There are a lot of stable setups with virtualisation out there.
It all depends on the setup and the knowledge on the topic with the
On 2008-12-29, Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.info wrote:
On 15:22, Mon 29 Dec 08, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Those things crash more often than windows 3.11
totally_offtopic
I'm getting a bit annoyed by statements like this.
There are a lot of stable setups with virtualisation out there.
they
On 12/27/2008 5:12 PM, Lars NoodC)n wrote:
I ask because I'm trying to set up an environment where kernel-level
work can be done remotely. Having more perspectives will help.
Old Compaq Remote Insight Lights Out boards will work in any machine
that still has a PCI slot. You can control the
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:10:04PM -0500, bofh wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Rene Maroufi i...@maroufi.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 03:32:50PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I'll comment by saying that developing a storage driver remotely is a
total pain in the ass bordering
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 03:16:26PM -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote:
You should try current. I have these very chipsets on a board I have, and
the IDE support works great for PATA drives, haven't plugged in any SATA
drives I will admit, mind showing a dmesg so we can get an idea of how
old a kernel
bofh wrote:
I think Marco's point was that if there are crashes, lockups, etc, it
is a pain in the ass not to have console access, or to be able to
unplug the power and reboot into a working config/kernel, etc etc.
...
Access to a second box, for control, which has both serial and Ethernet
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
bofh wrote:
I think Marco's point was that if there are crashes, lockups, etc, it
is a pain in the ass not to have console access, or to be able to
unplug the power and reboot into a working config/kernel, etc etc.
...
Access to a second box, for control, which has both
Hi,
I have a new PC with an Athlon 64 CPU, and SiS Chipsets. The SiS SATA
Chip, and the SiS Onboard Ethernet Controller doesn't work on OpenBSD.
The SATA-HDD works without DMA. I plugged in a PCI-Ethernet Card and an
IDE HDD, but if any developer have interest to develop a driver for the
SiS 190
You should try current. I have these very chipsets on a board I have, and
the IDE support works great for PATA drives, haven't plugged in any SATA
drives I will admit, mind showing a dmesg so we can get an idea of how
old a kernel you are running/
It was suggested to me the SIS 190 is such a
I'll comment by saying that developing a storage driver remotely is a
total pain in the ass bordering impossible.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 03:16:26PM -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote:
You should try current. I have these very chipsets on a board I have, and
the IDE support works great for PATA
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 03:32:50PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I'll comment by saying that developing a storage driver remotely is a
total pain in the ass bordering impossible.
Not, if there are 2 hard drives, both connected different (separate
Controllers). My OpenBSD System (amd64, 4.4
When was the last time you did it?
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:10:41PM +0100, Rene Maroufi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 03:32:50PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I'll comment by saying that developing a storage driver remotely is a
total pain in the ass bordering impossible.
Not, if there
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Rene Maroufi i...@maroufi.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 03:32:50PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I'll comment by saying that developing a storage driver remotely is a
total pain in the ass bordering impossible.
Not, if there are 2 hard drives, both
23 matches
Mail list logo
