New speed record: 980Mbps with a heavy loaded MacMini.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:44, Ken Withee wrote:
> It’s really awesome! Approaching gig!
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>
>> I forgot, the switch mus
I forgot, the switch must be compatible with jumbo frames. If you have a
managed switch, you need to enable it.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 14:58, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> The test had PF, NFS, and other services up.
> The mtu/JumboPacket on both nics is 9K bit.
> The w
The test had PF, NFS, and other services up.
The mtu/JumboPacket on both nics is 9K bit.
The wires are class 5e.
The switch is a 1Gbps cisco.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 08:19, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>
>> New
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Rupert Gallagher
wrote:
> New speed record today: 963Mbps between apu2c4 and a PC, both ways.
>
>
I never get above 550Mbit with pf enabled.
Ah, I’m not using pppoe so perhaps that’s significant? I have a straight
ethernet set up, em0 as uplink, em1 connected to a dumb switch, em2 connected
to a dumb WiFi AP. I measured the speed using fast.com on my mobile, laptop,
desktop, as well as downloading large files from different servers a
> On Nov 4, 2017, at 13:15, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 2017-11-04, Peter Faiman wrote:
>> Thank you for this explanation. My uplink is only 240mbit and my APU2
>> handles that perfectly, so I’m not having any of these problems.
>> But the insight into the current state of networking was gre
Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote:
> Look, I know what I am talking about. I have an apu that does what I said
> using negligible cpu load. And there is nothing fancy with it.
I see. Sorry, until you said this, I was not convinced that you knew. Having
read these words, it's now appare
On 2017-11-04, Peter Faiman wrote:
> Thank you for this explanation. My uplink is only 240mbit and my APU2
> handles that perfectly, so I’m not having any of these problems.
> But the insight into the current state of networking was great! :)
But it doesn't handle 240Mbit/s, *unless* the packets
Look, I know what I am talking about. I have an apu that does what I said using
negligible cpu load. And there is nothing fancy with it.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 17:53, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote: > > You seem to say that
>
Hi,
i´ve also an APU2 as router.
The uplink connection (16Mbit/s) is via pppoe(4) on em0
and i couldn´t manage to messure the throughput of this interface:
- iftop doesn´t work on pppoe and shows nothing on em0.
- ifperf also calculates some strange numbers (14669317741 Gbits/sec)
when trying to c
> On Nov 4, 2017, at 09:53, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
> Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote:
>>
>> You seem to say that handling larger packets is a feature of having limited
>> CPU. I disagree.
>>
>
> Rupert, I'm saying that a slower CPU can process less packets per second.
>
> The
Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote:
>
> You seem to say that handling larger packets is a feature of having limited
> CPU. I disagree.
>
Rupert, I'm saying that a slower CPU can process less packets per second.
The important measurement is packets-per-second. The APU has plenty of
me
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 01:51, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote:
>>> Out of curiosity, I just tested an apu2c4 server with obsd 6.1, against a
>>> windows 10 client on LAN with a 1Gbit CISCO switch in between and 9K MTU on
>>> both sides, using iperf3 -P10.
Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote:
> Out of curiosity, I just tested an apu2c4 server with obsd 6.1, against a
> windows 10 client on LAN with a 1Gbit CISCO switch in between and 9K MTU on
> both sides, using iperf3 -P10. The result is a spectacular 950Mbits/sec.
>
This is not a regr
openbsd "current"... is it 6.1 or 6.2?
if 6.2, was it better with 6.1?
From a later message of yours, you mention ISP upload, but the OP did not
mention it. Are you testing on LAN, WAN or internet?
Out of curiosity, I just tested an apu2c4 server with obsd 6.1, against a
windows 10 client on L
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2017/11/03 00:10, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
> >
> > Forwarding is kernel-only and should be faster than userland
> > sending. So if
> > you're trying to determ
On 2017/11/03 00:10, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>
> Forwarding is kernel-only and should be faster than userland
> sending. So if
> you're trying to determine performance when used for forwarding,
> you need to
> have
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>
>> Forwarding is kernel-only and should be faster than userland sending. So if
>> you're trying to determine performance when used for forwarding, you need
>> to
>> have other
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> Forwarding is kernel-only and should be faster than userland sending. So if
> you're trying to determine performance when used for forwarding, you need
> to
> have other machine/s sending and receiving packets for the test
The thing is t
On 2017-11-01, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:14:03AM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > I have a APU2C4 running OpenBSD-current (or.. .pretty current, from 27th
>> of
>> > October) - and acc
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:14:03AM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a APU2C4 running OpenBSD-current (or.. .pretty current, from 27th of
> October) - and according to iperf I'm not getting the speed that I was
> expecting.
>
> Between the APU and the other machines I have I get:
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:14:03AM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have a APU2C4 running OpenBSD-current (or.. .pretty current, from 27th
> of
> > October) - and according to iperf I'm not getting the speed that I wa
Hi!
I have a APU2C4 running OpenBSD-current (or.. .pretty current, from 27th of
October) - and according to iperf I'm not getting the speed that I was
expecting.
Between the APU and the other machines I have I get: 465 Mbits/sec - While
between two other machines, connected to the same switch I g
23 matches
Mail list logo