I have upgraded an amd64 from 3.9 to 4.0.
I followed all the Upgrade Guide using install media.
Updated packages.
Updated sys sources to -stable and made a new kernel.
Everything worked perfectly.
Then I download and extracted src.tar.gz. Nothing else was present in
the src directory but sys.
On 11/11/06, Federico Giannici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have upgraded an amd64 from 3.9 to 4.0.
I followed all the Upgrade Guide using install media.
Updated packages.
Updated sys sources to -stable and made a new kernel.
Everything worked perfectly.
Then I download and extracted
Dunceor wrote:
On 11/11/06, *Federico Giannici* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have upgraded an amd64 from 3.9 to 4.0.
I followed all the Upgrade Guide using install media.
Updated packages.
Updated sys sources to -stable and made a new kernel.
On 11/11/06, Federico Giannici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunceor wrote:
On 11/11/06, *Federico Giannici* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have upgraded an amd64 from 3.9 to 4.0.
I followed all the Upgrade Guide using install media.
Updated packages.
z0mbix wrote:
On 11/11/06, Federico Giannici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunceor wrote:
On 11/11/06, *Federico Giannici* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have upgraded an amd64 from 3.9 to 4.0.
I followed all the Upgrade Guide using install media.
Updated
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:25:29PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
I have written that I upgraded to -stable the KERNEL (src/sys) and
compiled a new one.
Good. Then you should have compiled userland as well and forgotten about
the patching process, since you already had the patch as part of
Try this:
Update ports, src, sys, and XF4 archives to -stable as outlined on
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html. After you've got -stable ports and
source, re-compile your kernel and your userland as outlined on
http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html.
Then, while your userland binaries are
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:25:29PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
I have written that I upgraded to -stable the KERNEL (src/sys) and
compiled a new one.
Good. Then you should have compiled userland as well and forgotten about
the patching process, since you already had
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:25:29PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
I have written that I upgraded to -stable the KERNEL (src/sys) and
compiled a new one.
THEN I extracted the src.tar.gz archive, patched it with
002_openssl.patch, and note that the patch SUCCEDED.
Then I tried to compile
Federico Giannici wrote:
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:25:29PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
I have written that I upgraded to -stable the KERNEL (src/sys) and
compiled a new one.
Good. Then you should have compiled userland as well and forgotten about
the patching
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:40:34PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
[...]
/usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error: `NID_sha256'
undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error: (Each
undeclared identifier is
Don't patch. Start with an empty /usr/src/ and extract fresh archives,
then update them to -stable and recompile *ALL* userland binaries.
These pages are your friend for this:
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html
Federico Giannici wrote:
Federico Giannici
Joel Goguen wrote:
Don't patch. Start with an empty /usr/src/ and extract fresh archives,
then update them to -stable and recompile *ALL* userland binaries.
These pages are your friend for this:
OK, I can do it, but then why the patches exist if I HAVE to use -stable???
I extracted a fresh
Dan Harnett wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:40:34PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
[...]
/usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error: `NID_sha256'
undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error: (Each
undeclared
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:58:36PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
Darrin Chandler wrote:
So you moved your source back to -release and the patch applied. Moving
back to -release sources on a -stable system isn't a good idea.
Humm...
So you are saying that it's not possible compile a
If you update your kernel to -stable, you must also update your userland
binaries to -stable, and your ports tree. When running -stable you
don't need the patches, since the patches are applied against -release
and are already incorporated into -stable.
Basically, choose one. Either run
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
Joel Goguen wrote:
Don't patch. Start with an empty /usr/src/ and extract fresh archives,
then update them to -stable and recompile *ALL* userland binaries.
These pages are your friend for this:
OK, I can do it, but then
On 11/11/06, Federico Giannici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I can do it, but then why the patches exist if I HAVE to use -stable???
You don't have to use -stable.
--
Piotr Jjdryczek
RLU #271063
RBU #51278
On Nov 11, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Federico Giannici wrote:
No, I'm SURE I executed ALL of them, including make includes!
In fact, it is in the steps I wrote.
And I repeated it a couple of times.
There must be something else wrong...
I happened to have a freshly-upgraded 4.0 box on hand here,
Federico Giannici wrote:
Dan Harnett wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:40:34PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
[...]
/usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error:
`NID_sha256'
undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165:
20 matches
Mail list logo
