Ulf Brosziewski, 15 Jun 2016 00:48:
> Your feedback in bugs@ would be appreciated. Can you exclude that
> it's a hardware failure? Some people claim that various Acer models
> are prone to such failures because the touchpads have a bad
> electrical grounding.
i sent a reply to your bugs@ reply
On 06/14/2016 11:58 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> ropers, 14 Jun 2016 03:37:
>>> the acer travelmate b115-m is an el cheapo netbook
>>> with no moving parts if you stick an ssd in it.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the addition and dmesg. Do you know if all the Travelmate B115's
>> are fanless or only the M
ropers, 14 Jun 2016 03:37:
> > the acer travelmate b115-m is an el cheapo netbook
> > with no moving parts if you stick an ssd in it.
> >
>
> Thanks for the addition and dmesg. Do you know if all the Travelmate B115's
> are fanless or only the M models, not MP or P? What about the B116's and
>
Erling Westenvik, 14 Jun 2016 09:03:
> With all due respect: This is not the place to ask for detailed specs
> for a whole series of computers. You could easily have found answers to all
> of your questions above if you had done some very basic homework:
>
>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:37:01AM +0200, ropers wrote:
> On 14 June 2016 at 00:53, frantisek holop wrote:
>
> > the acer travelmate b115-m is an el cheapo netbook
> > with no moving parts if you stick an ssd in it.
>
> Thanks for the addition and dmesg. Do you know if all the
On 14 June 2016 at 00:53, frantisek holop wrote:
> the acer travelmate b115-m is an el cheapo netbook
> with no moving parts if you stick an ssd in it.
>
Thanks for the addition and dmesg. Do you know if all the Travelmate B115's
are fanless or only the M models, not MP or P?
the acer travelmate b115-m is an el cheapo netbook
with no moving parts if you stick an ssd in it.
the sound of silence is very relaxing.
it suspends, resumes, most things work;
the clickpad and the wifi being notable exceptions.
but there is no wifi card blacklist (eat shit lenovo)
so problem
> :It is not a good idea to mix topics, stay focused and think before send.
> :
> :Attitude is formed based on intelligence of email postings. We all know
> :highly educated people can disagree without negative feelings. Grow up.
> :
> :I encourage you to keep posting until you meet the quality
On 2016 Jun 13 (Mon) at 05:25:17 +0300 (+0300), li...@wrant.com wrote:
:It is not a good idea to mix topics, stay focused and think before send.
:
:Attitude is formed based on intelligence of email postings. We all know
:highly educated people can disagree without negative feelings. Grow up.
:
I'll see what I can get for you, ropers. In the mean while, I can say
that most of the devices on my CF-30 and CF-31 function well, as
indicated by the dmesg. Then again, they only have basic options on
those laptops.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:25:29 +0200
ropers wrote:
>
> Also,
> On 13 June 2016 at 05:29, wrote:
> > ignore this entire mediocre thread, search the archive instead.
Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:25:29 +0200 ropers
> I did.
This is a lie. You created the thread on purpose with wrong definitions.
This is towards future readers,
Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:07:14 +1000
> Irony mode ACTIVATE.
Exactly: ignore this entire mediocre thread, search the archive instead.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:25:17 +0300
li...@wrant.com wrote:
> ... until you meet the quality expectations.
Irony mode ACTIVATE.
> > Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:48:33 +0200 ropers
> > > Compiled for myself and the archives:
> >
> > For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality threads.
> >
> > > < Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
> >
> > You're in for a LOT of disappointment
If you can't read the question properly, please remain silent.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 02:21:48 +0300
li...@wrant.com wrote:
> For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality
> threads.
...
> You're in for a LOT of disappointment if you follow marketing material
> without dmesg and
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 4:21 PM, wrote:
> Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:48:33 +0200 ropers
> > Compiled for myself and the archives:
>
> For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality threads.
>
> > < Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
>
>
Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:48:33 +0200 ropers
> Compiled for myself and the archives:
For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality threads.
> < Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
You're in for a LOT of disappointment if you follow marketing material
Compiled for myself and the archives:
< Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
Some of these specs/prices highly uncertain/unreliable/subject to change.
Interface abundance decreases from top to bottom.
Toughbooks don't seem to have built-in mics, which may be a plus for the
practical
> Wrant. Really appreciate it.
Just ignore it, you can't let an isolated response taint your view of the
mailing list! I wish I could help you, but I don't know an answer to your
question.
Thanks for all the private personal attacks and abusive messages such
as this one, Wrant. Really appreciate it.
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:46:47 +0300
li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Shithead. Get lost. You're on auto-delete. You don't exist.
Allow me to explain that complex thought.
I didn't say that all machines are useless, nor did I say that any
machine is useless. One machine that is useful for Purpose #1 is
useless for Purpose #2; likewise, the machine that works well for
Purpose #2 is quite possibly useless for Purpose #1.
Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:07:24 +1000
> On the other hand, those types of machines are useless for high-end
> video editing, which may be what a "desktop" is to you.
That's one very complex thought, hold it, keep still, don't move an inch.
No machine is useless, it's the
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 13:03, ropers wrote:
> Does anybody here have a fanless laptop they run OpenBSD on?
> (Possibly even as their primary computer? How poor of a desktop
> replacement
> is it?)
>
> If not, is there anything that comes close (and how much can I not afford
> it)?
>
For
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 03:21:40 +0300
li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:03:37 +0200 ropers
> > Does anybody here have a fanless laptop they run OpenBSD on?
> > (Possibly even as their primary computer? How poor of a desktop
> > replacement is it?)
>
> For a true no
Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:03:37 +0200 ropers
> Does anybody here have a fanless laptop they run OpenBSD on?
> (Possibly even as their primary computer? How poor of a desktop replacement
> is it?)
For a true no moving parts passive cooling system, you're out of luck
with the desktop
I do have a Panasonic Toughbook CF-30 which doesn't have a fan, I have
successfully run -current on it.
If you want something more modern, but a bit smaller, the CF-19 may be
a good choice. It is a bit small though.
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:03:37 +0200
ropers wrote:
> Does
Does anybody here have a fanless laptop they run OpenBSD on?
(Possibly even as their primary computer? How poor of a desktop replacement
is it?)
If not, is there anything that comes close (and how much can I not afford
it)?
27 matches
Mail list logo