On a lcd screen, short of hi-def video's and gaming, it's hard for the
eye to see meaningful difference between 16 and 24 bit depth. In some
case 15 bit depth works better on lcds.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: KDE presents a
On 12 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It takes me 3 or 4 startx's before I get a KDE screen that looks
normal. When it looks bad, the terminal background is black and other
contrast problems exist. Other times it simply locks up in the middle
of starting up.
Has any one else had
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
ever used in my life. On the another hand KDE is 200m very elaborate GUI
coded for mostly with Linux in mind. I am not aware that one can use any
Well, AFAIK they're actually very open to !linux systems, much more than
GNOME for instance.
of
Rob Lytle wrote:
Predrag Punosevac to me, misc
Rob Lytle wrote:
I searched back through the archives using KDE as a keyword and as
far as I can tell I am the only OpenBSD post.
This is typical for me. I end up with a unique problem that no one
can solve because it never came up before.
On 12 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It takes me 3 or 4 startx's before I get a KDE screen that looks
normal. When it looks bad, the terminal background is black and other
contrast problems exist. Other times it simply locks up in the middle
of starting up.
Has any one else had
Hi,
It takes me 3 or 4 startx's before I get a KDE screen that looks
normal. When it looks bad, the terminal background is black and other
contrast problems exist. Other times it simply locks up in the middle
of starting up.
Has any one else had these problems?
Thanks, Rob.
--
Emancipate
I think I know what the response will be: use some other window
manager. I do use Windowmaker for root since its so much simpler.
But I've gotten used to KDE and obviously no one else is having any
problems with it. So whats up?
Sincerely, Rob
--
Emancipate yourself from mental slavery,
I searched back through the archives using KDE as a keyword and as
far as I can tell I am the only OpenBSD post.
This is typical for me. I end up with a unique problem that no one
can solve because it never came up before.
Sigh, I guess its FreeBSD or Vista on this triple boot laptop.
Rob.
--
Rob Lytle wrote:
I searched back through the archives using KDE as a keyword and as
far as I can tell I am the only OpenBSD post.
This is typical for me. I end up with a unique problem that no one
can solve because it never came up before.
Sigh, I guess its FreeBSD or Vista on this triple boot
Rob Lytle wrote:
Predrag Punosevac to me, misc
Rob Lytle wrote:
I searched back through the archives using KDE as a keyword and as
far as I can tell I am the only OpenBSD post.
This is typical for me. I end up with a unique problem that no one
can solve because it never came up before.
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
P. S. And yes I will also suggest that you use something much
lighter. I see no purpose in running KDE on the top of the system
like OpenBSD.
Why would you say sth like that???
First of all I hope I didn't offend the port
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
P. S. And yes I will also suggest that you use something much lighter. I see
no purpose in running KDE on the top of the system
like OpenBSD.
Why would you say sth like that???
--
Antoine
12 matches
Mail list logo
