Hello everybody,
Lately I switched to a new ISP in germany wich provides much more bandwith
(~18Mbit) then my old ISP (~2Mbit).
Until now I use the pppD and not the kernel-pppoe.
I read somewhere that the kernel-pppoe may should be better with such fast
connections so I tried to configure it.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello everybody,
Lately I switched to a new ISP in germany wich provides much more bandwith
(~18Mbit) then my old ISP (~2Mbit).
Until now I use the pppD and not the kernel-pppoe.
I read somewhere that the kernel-pppoe may should be better with such fast
Last week I had the same problem switching to T-DSL. Unfortunately I didn't
have time for debugging and left it with userland pppoe. But I would like also
to use the kernel one.
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:02:32 +0200 (CEST), sebastian.rother wrote
Hello everybody,
Lately I switched to a new ISP
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:02:32AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pppoedev xl1
!/sbin/ifconfig xl1 up
!/usr/sbin/spppcontrol \$if myauthproto=pap myauthname=MYTEL \
myauthkey=MYPASS
!/sbin/ifconfig \$if inet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.1 netmask 0x
!/sbin/route add default 0.0.0.1
up
..
Kind
Last week I had the same problem switching to T-DSL. Unfortunately I
didn't
have time for debugging and left it with userland pppoe. But I would like
also
to use the kernel one.
Thanks for all suggestions so far.
I4ll investigate it in the evening or some hours (depends to the work).
For
On 06/07/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Last week I had the same problem switching to T-DSL. Unfortunately I
didn't
have time for debugging and left it with userland pppoe. But I would
like
also
to use the kernel one.
Thanks for all suggestions so far.
I4ll
On 7/6/06, knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd suspect some different issues than just blaming the implementation
of the daemon
sorry, this is of course not about the daemon, but the rest still applies
--knitti
On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For now I can and will point out the followring:
The userland pppd simply just sucks.
Sorry but it becomes realy kind of unuseable if you`ve a... faster line.
I had a 2MBit ADSL-Connection (192kbit/s upload) and had no problem.
Now I`ve a
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:52:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wont blame the developers because they offen said the userland pppoe has
a lot overhead but that`s simply a bad joke. :-(
Userland pppoe copies the pppoe session frame from kernel to userland via
bpf(4) into the pppoe(8)
On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For now I can and will point out the followring:
The userland pppd simply just sucks.
Sorry but it becomes realy kind of unuseable if you`ve a... faster
line.
I had a 2MBit ADSL-Connection (192kbit/s upload) and had no problem.
Now
On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My hardware is a Duron 900Mhz with 3x128MB SD100 and a 6GB HDD.
The NICs are 2x xl (3Com) and one time Ath0 (wlan).
which should be more than enough
It seams to be realy a problem with the userland pppd wich limits the
upload/download so
Aloha
Am 06.07.2006 um 14:09 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe AMD Geode CPUs are an alternative but I didn`t found any
reseller
wich sells them nor any Board where they`re assembled on (fixed).
http://www.pcengines.ch/wrap.htm
12 matches
Mail list logo
