On 12/12/14 19:48, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 15:00, Richard Toohey wrote:
(3) can help with the POSIX questions.
The maintainer has asked the same question on a MOC forum:
http://moc.daper.net/node/1369
I have no idea what posix features they want, so it's a tough question.
Hi, guys.
This might be more a question for ports@ but it is also a general do
you use it question.
I've been trying to help the MOC maintainer with testing changes on OpenBSD.
He wants to use some newer POSIX features but it seems that if he does
so, he'll have to leave OpenBSD behind. I
I've used MOC quite a bit on OpenBSD, though just a local compile -
nothing fancy like a port. It's probably the only non-base program I
ever use on the Sparc 5.
What specifically is missing?
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Richard Toohey
richardtoo...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
Hi, guys.
This
The maintainer has asked the same question on a MOC forum:
I'll take the first option:
1. Stop using MOC
I'm a user of MOC when using Linux, because it's simple to config, but I think
the OpenBSD Project will be fine without MOC updates, and the users can switch
to mpd.
On 12.12.2014 03:00, Richard Toohey wrote:
Hi, guys.
This might be more a question for ports@ but it is also a general do
you use it question.
I've been trying to help the MOC maintainer with testing changes on
OpenBSD.
He wants to use some newer POSIX features but it seems that if he
does
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 15:00, Richard Toohey wrote:
(3) can help with the POSIX questions.
The maintainer has asked the same question on a MOC forum:
http://moc.daper.net/node/1369
I have no idea what posix features they want, so it's a tough question.
unistd.h does say
#define
6 matches
Mail list logo
