Re: NSD/Unbound clarifications

On 2015-11-25, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Thanks for all clarification about NSD/Unbound usage. > I've another question about dns dynamic update for dhcpd. > With named, installing isc-dhcp using dynamic update for dns from dhcpd. > It is possibile with unbound/NSD?

Re: NSD/Unbound clarifications

On 11/25/15 12:37, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2015-11-25, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Thanks for all clarification about NSD/Unbound usage. I've another question about dns dynamic update for dhcpd. With named, installing isc-dhcp using dynamic update for dns from dhcpd.

Re: NSD/Unbound clarifications

Thanks for all clarification about NSD/Unbound usage. I've another question about dns dynamic update for dhcpd. With named, installing isc-dhcp using dynamic update for dns from dhcpd. It is possibile with unbound/NSD? From google I can't find a valid answer. In my case, I've ridden unbound man

Re: NSD/Unbound clarifications

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:24:53PM +0100, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Hi list, > I've switched from Obsd 5.3 from Pfsense to try it. Now I want come back to > Obsd. I prefer it. > Great choice. [snip] > Now today I've nsd and unbound that I can use on my firewall. > I don't need authoritative

Re: NSD/Unbound clarifications

On 2015-11-23 Mon 12:24 PM |, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > In my last valid OBSD config, I used named for my lan (not exposed on > internet) only for lan dns serving, not exposed, with recursion and > forwarder. > unbound can fill this role for you Alessandro. Search for 'local-zone' in

NSD/Unbound clarifications

Hi list, I've switched from Obsd 5.3 from Pfsense to try it. Now I want come back to Obsd. I prefer it. Today, the last version is 5.8 and from 5.6 named was replaced from nsd and unbound. The first is only authoritative and the other is

Re: NSD/Unbound clarifications

On 2015-11-23, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Hi list, > I've switched from Obsd 5.3 from Pfsense to try it. Now I want come back > to Obsd. I prefer it. > > Today, the last version is 5.8 and from 5.6 named was replaced from nsd > and unbound. > > The first is only

Re: NSD/Unbound clarifications

Thanks for clarification. Unbound configured and works well. Another question abount unbound "capacity". I've configured unbound for a small network. What is "maximum capacity" of Unbound? Is suitable for big networks? Il 23/11/2015 13:28, Dahlberg, David ha scritto: Am Montag, den

Re: NSD/Unbound clarifications

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 04:27:08PM +0100, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > I've configured unbound for a small network. What is "maximum > capacity" of Unbound? Is suitable for big networks? What was the maximum capacity of bind? Was it suitable for big networks? How did you find out? -- I'm not