Subject: Re: OpenBGPD via (WG?) Tunnel Not Learning Routes
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:01:09AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022-07-13, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
> > Heho,
> >
> > When doing what i described in my message, I get the below messages.
> >
> > When I se
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:01:09AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022-07-13, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
> > Heho,
> >
> > When doing what i described in my message, I get the below messages.
> >
> > When I set static routes, packet forwarding works fine, i.e.:
> >
> > gw02.dus01.as59645.net ~ #
Heho,
As mentioned, I gave it a shot with eoip, and that worked as intended. What I
noticed though, is that wg0 seems to stick around in bgpd, even after an
ifconfig wg0 destroy; I fixed this by using another ip range for transfer and
rebooting the downstream to make sure; In any case, with an
On 2022-07-13, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
> Heho,
>
> When doing what i described in my message, I get the below messages.
>
> When I set static routes, packet forwarding works fine, i.e.:
>
> gw02.dus01.as59645.net ~ # route add -inet6 2a06:d1c2::/48
> 2a06:d1c0::dead:beef:c02
> add net
1 connected wg0
(UP, unknown)
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org On Behalf Of Stuart
Henderson
Sent: Wednesday, 13 July 2022 08:14
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenBGPD via (WG?) Tunnel Not Learning Routes
On 2022-07-13, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
> Heho,
>
On 2022-07-13, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
> Heho,
> I am running OpenBGPd (on 7.1+binpatches), and have some tunnel links between
> hosts and up/downstreams over wg tunnels.
>
> I am basically wondering whether the behavior is known/normal and/or happened
> to others, or if it is worth it to setup a
Hello Tobias,
Next hop Validation to make routes valid ? asks the question is the Next
hop reachable...
so if you look at the prefixes learned and the next hop... you may need
additional routes to make the next hop visible (via an Interior Routing
Protocol o) (OSPF RIP / EIGRP) or Static
Heho,
I am running OpenBGPd (on 7.1+binpatches), and have some tunnel links between
hosts and up/downstreams over wg tunnels.
I am basically wondering whether the behavior is known/normal and/or happened
to others, or if it is worth it to setup a test-setup to properly debug the
issue/document
8 matches
Mail list logo