Dear all,
* On Tuesday 08 August 2006 05:11, Nick Holland wrote:
[rsync vs. nfs approach]
Simplicity is your friend.
rsync is simple, easy to understand, and easy to recover.
[...]
No, I can't prove it, but I much prefer the simple solution which has
simple and understood problems, than the
Dear all,
we are thinking about a scenario on how to set up a server offering http, ftp
and a few postfix/mailman driven mailinglists with a redundant failover. I'm
_not_ talking about load balancing here - only the master is serving, while
the slave sits still and waits, probably with all
On 8/7/06, Jens Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the networking part can be handled by carp, I'm collecting ideas on how
to keep the local file systems in synch - especially for ftp users and the
mailinglist archives. The synchronization will be done via a dedicated cross
coonect cable
knitti wrote:
On 8/7/06, Jens Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the networking part can be handled by carp, I'm collecting ideas
on how
to keep the local file systems in synch - especially for ftp users and
the
mailinglist archives. The synchronization will be done via a dedicated
cross
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:07:53PM +0200, knitti wrote:
On 8/7/06, Jens Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the networking part can be handled by carp, I'm collecting ideas on
how
to keep the local file systems in synch - especially for ftp users and the
mailinglist archives. The
I am running two clusters using carp for network failover.
I use rsync every 15 minutes for the simple webapp which issues
x509 certs. A script runs on each node to check if it is
master if so it makes a crl, if not it pulls the directory hierarchy
from the master.
The other cluster does the
On Aug 7, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:07:53PM +0200, knitti wrote:
On 8/7/06, Jens Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the networking part can be handled by carp, I'm collecting
ideas on
how
to keep the local file systems in synch - especially for
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Jason Dixon wrote:
SNIP
Also, I'm not sure how ccd and nfs interact, but given that ccd isn't
meant for data security (use RAIDframe) and nfs has many interesting
issues, I'm not certain I would trust my data to that.
I *believe* that, presuming the NFS server itself
knitti wrote:
On 8/7/06, Jens Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the networking part can be handled by carp, I'm collecting ideas
on how
to keep the local file systems in synch - especially for ftp users and
the
mailinglist archives. The synchronization will be done via a dedicated
cross
Nick Holland wrote:
knitti wrote:
On 8/7/06, Jens Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the networking part can be handled by carp, I'm collecting
ideas on how
to keep the local file systems in synch - especially for ftp users
and the
mailinglist archives. The synchronization will be done
10 matches
Mail list logo
