Re: OpenCVS: No LockDir? :)
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:27:07PM +0300, mazoc...@disroot.org wrote: > Hi! > > opencvs server: ignoring unknown option 'LockDir' > > It appears running anonymous OpenCVS server is awesome :D > > Anyway, it works, but if I remove LockDir, anonymous GNU CVS > stops working because it can't create LockDir :) > > As far as I understand anonymous OpenCVS doesn't create > lock directory and just gives me files I need, right? > Ok, after reading OpenCVS's cvs.5 I see $CVSROOT/CVSROOT/config supports only 3 options. Does OpenCVS need other options from GNU CVS for $CVSROOT/CVSROOT/config or they should stay left out?
OpenCVS: No LockDir? :)
Hi! opencvs server: ignoring unknown option 'LockDir' It appears running anonymous OpenCVS server is awesome :D Anyway, it works, but if I remove LockDir, anonymous GNU CVS stops working because it can't create LockDir :) As far as I understand anonymous OpenCVS doesn't create lock directory and just gives me files I need, right?
Re: Little OpenCVS bug
On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 09:03:04PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018-02-04, mazocomp <mazoc...@disroot.org> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I tried updating both /usr/src and /usr/ports with OpenCVS. It worked, > > but it also downloaded empty directories (GNU CVS never did that): > > > > $ ls /usr/src/ > > CVSMakefile.cross distribgames include > > kerberosV libexecregressshare usr.bin > > Makefile binetcgnukerberosIV > > liblkmsbin sysusr.sbin > > $ ls /usr/src/kerberosIV/man/ > > CVS > > $ ls /usr/ports/www/vimb/ > > CVS patches pkg > > $ > > > > My ~/.cvsrc is: > > > > # $OpenBSD: dot.cvsrc,v 1.3 2016/10/31 20:50:11 tb Exp $ > > # > > diff -uNp > > update -Pd > > checkout -P > > rdiff -u > > > > > > Need more information on exactly what you did, I just did a test checkout > using opencvs and it works as expected here. > > (Whereas gnu cvs *does* download and create the empty directories, and then > if you used -P it goes through at the end to remove them again). > > I did "$ opencvs -d anon...@anoncvs.fr.openbsd.org:/cvs update" in both /usr/ports and /usr/src directories.
Re: Little OpenCVS bug
On 2018-02-04, mazocomp <mazoc...@disroot.org> wrote: > Hi! > > I tried updating both /usr/src and /usr/ports with OpenCVS. It worked, > but it also downloaded empty directories (GNU CVS never did that): > > $ ls /usr/src/ > CVSMakefile.cross distribgames include > kerberosV libexecregressshare usr.bin > Makefile binetcgnukerberosIV > liblkmsbin sysusr.sbin > $ ls /usr/src/kerberosIV/man/ > CVS > $ ls /usr/ports/www/vimb/ > CVS patches pkg > $ > > My ~/.cvsrc is: > > # $OpenBSD: dot.cvsrc,v 1.3 2016/10/31 20:50:11 tb Exp $ > # > diff -uNp > update -Pd > checkout -P > rdiff -u > > Need more information on exactly what you did, I just did a test checkout using opencvs and it works as expected here. (Whereas gnu cvs *does* download and create the empty directories, and then if you used -P it goes through at the end to remove them again).
Little OpenCVS bug
Hi! I tried updating both /usr/src and /usr/ports with OpenCVS. It worked, but it also downloaded empty directories (GNU CVS never did that): $ ls /usr/src/ CVSMakefile.cross distribgames include kerberosV libexecregressshare usr.bin Makefile binetcgnukerberosIV liblkmsbin sysusr.sbin $ ls /usr/src/kerberosIV/man/ CVS $ ls /usr/ports/www/vimb/ CVS patches pkg $ My ~/.cvsrc is: # $OpenBSD: dot.cvsrc,v 1.3 2016/10/31 20:50:11 tb Exp $ # diff -uNp update -Pd checkout -P rdiff -u
Re: Status of OpenCVS
Hi, multiplex'd wrote on Thu, May 11, 2017 at 04:48:36PM +0100: > I recently stumbled across the OpenCVS webpages and I was wondering > what the status of the project is. It is dormant. While it is *almost* ready for production, actually trying to use it in production revealed instabilities that were non-trivial to debug, and nobody did the work to get if from "almost ready" to "reliable". Nobody can predict how much work that would require. If somebody seriously tried, it might get done in a month, or take a year, or fail completely. It is not typical for OpenBSD projects that they go dormant shortly before being ready for production, but this is one of the sad cases where that did happen. > The webpage says that it is to be released soon, > however commits to the CVS tree seem to be few and far between. > Is the codebase in a state where it could be ported to other > operating systems yet? Porting OpenBSD userland code to other operating systems (that are reasonably similar to POSIX) is in general not a big problem if you follow the practices established by OpenSSH and mandoc and LibreSSL, unless that code heavily relies on special OpenBSD kernel facilities, which certainly isn't the case here. You can certainly port it and run it elsewhere. But i wouldn't expect it to be more stable than on OpenBSD, so using it to manage important data is risky, unless you pay very close attention and are prepared to fix non-trivial bugs yourself (and send patches). Yours, Ingo
Status of OpenCVS
Hello all, I recently stumbled across the OpenCVS webpages and I was wondering what the status of the project is. The webpage says that it is to be released soon, however commits to the CVS tree seem to be few and far between. Is the codebase in a state where it could be ported to other operating systems yet? Thanks, multiplex'd
opencvs@ support for openbsd.mirror.frontiernet.net
in response to the 18x18ja.bdf out of memory issue while using GNU cvs on the server, i've implemented support for opencvs to run the cvs server also. as it has always been, one can access GNU cvs on the server side with: CVSROOT=anon...@openbsd.mirror.frontiernet.net:/cvs and now one can access opencvs on the server side with: CVSROOT=open...@openbsd.mirror.frontiernet.net:/cvs this seems to be particularly relevant for anyone trying to check out xenocara sources (see above, and google/mailing lists for, as i understand it, 18x18ja.bdf vs openbsd 64b on the server), as opencvs server doesn't OOM when it hits 18x18ja.bdf. note: this does not mean you need to use opencvs as a client, gnu cvs client completes the checkout OK when using opencvs@. -- jared
opencvs problem fetching current source
Hi, For some months now, I have exactly the same problem than: http://marc.info/?t=12985968427r=1w=2 and I carefully read the post of Philip. I have a local repo (synced through cvsync) and it seems that updating sources with a local repo triggers a problem. I checked out /usr/src this way: cd /usr opencvs -d /home/OpenBSD_cvsync co src -P and I used this command to update: cd /usr/src opencvs up -CAPd /home/OpenBSD_cvsync is my local OpenBSD repo: $ ls -l /home/OpenBSD_cvsync/ total 72 drwxr-xr-x 4 oc wsrc 2048 May 26 14:09 CVSROOT drwxr-xr-x 6 oc wsrc 512 Sep 22 2009 X11 drwxr-xr-x 7 oc wsrc 512 Sep 22 2009 XF4 drwxr-xr-x 2 oc wsrc 512 Sep 22 2009 cvsync drwxr-xr-x 61 oc wsrc 1536 May 16 14:09 ports drwxr-xr-x 19 oc wsrc 512 Apr 25 14:10 src drwxr-xr-x 46 oc wsrc 5632 May 26 14:13 www drwxr-xr-x 16 oc wsrc 512 May 8 14:12 xenocara $ pwd /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/pqueue $ cat CVS/Root /home/OpenBSD_cvsync $ rm pqueue.h $ opencvs up pqueue.h opencvs update: warning: pqueue.h was lost U pqueue.h opencvs update: failed to open history file $ grep compat pqueue.h #include openssl/pq_compat.h $ md5 pqueue.h MD5 (pqueue.h) = a1fd3f944a2777bb249d0e420d965c7f $ rm pqueue.h $ cvs -d :ext:anon...@anoncvs.fr.openbsd.org:/cvs up pqueue.h U pqueue.h $ grep compat pqueue.h $ md5 pqueue.h MD5 (pqueue.h) = 08e291548d9a920f534ea0717ee3ed88 As you see, using remote (:ext:) mode gives me the right version of the file but not using local mode. However, it says it is fetching version 1.1.1.2 : $ rm pqueue.h $ opencvs -t up pqueue.h C- cvs_parse_configfile() C- cvs_parse_modules() C- cvs_file_walklist: element 'pqueue.h' C- cvs_repository_lock(/home/OpenBSD_cvsync/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/pqueue, 0) C- cvs_update_local(pqueue.h) C- cvs_file_classify(pqueue.h, none) C- cvs_ent_open(.) opencvs update: warning: pqueue.h was lost C- cvs_checkout_file(pqueue.h, 1.1.1.2, 0) - to disk C- cvs_ent_open(.) C- cvs_ent_remove(./CVS/Entries, pqueue.h) C- cvs_ent_add(./CVS/Entries, /pqueue.h/1.1.1.2/Fri May 27 08:05:19 2011//) U pqueue.h C- cvs_history_add(`U', `pqueue.h', `(null)') opencvs update: failed to open history file C- cvs_cleanup: removing locks C- cvs_cleanup: removing temp files C- cvs_ent_close(./CVS/Entries.Backup, 1) $ but it doesn't get the content of the version 1.1.1.2: Any idea ? Thanks, -- Olivier Cherrier - Symacx.com mailto:o...@symacx.com
Re: OpenCVS in Base?
It's in the tree but not linked into the build. You can use it and there are people working on it sporadically, but expect bugs. On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:05:21AM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote: I am starting a new project that needs version control and I was thinking about using OpenCVS. However, I'm not sure if it is in the base (I'm running -current). My old 4.4 firewall has /usr/bin/opencvs. Is /usr/bin/cvs actually opencvs? I noticed http://www.openbsd.org/plus48.html states Removed OpenCVS from the build. And OpenCVS.org directs me to http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/. What's the status?
OpenCVS in Base?
I am starting a new project that needs version control and I was thinking about using OpenCVS. However, I'm not sure if it is in the base (I'm running -current). My old 4.4 firewall has /usr/bin/opencvs. Is /usr/bin/cvs actually opencvs? I noticed http://www.openbsd.org/plus48.html states Removed OpenCVS from the build. And OpenCVS.org directs me to http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/. What's the status?
Re: OpenCVS in Base?
I guess it was replaced sometime in between August-October after Tobias Stoeckmann sent in some patches which worked well. I know because I manually deleted /usr/bin/opencvs and read a little about it, I think it was on t...@. We might get that OpenCVS announcement for 4.9 On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Clint Pachl pa...@ecentryx.com wrote: I am starting a new project that needs version control and I was thinking about using OpenCVS. However, I'm not sure if it is in the base (I'm running -current). My old 4.4 firewall has /usr/bin/opencvs. Is /usr/bin/cvs actually opencvs? I noticed http://www.openbsd.org/plus48.html states Removed OpenCVS from the build. And OpenCVS.org directs me to http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/. What's the status?
Re: OpenCVS in Base?
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:05:21AM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote: I am starting a new project that needs version control and I was thinking about using OpenCVS. However, I'm not sure if it is in the base (I'm running -current). My old 4.4 firewall has /usr/bin/opencvs. Is /usr/bin/cvs actually opencvs? No /usr/bin/cvs is GNU CVS: /usr/bin/cvs -v I noticed http://www.openbsd.org/plus48.html states Removed OpenCVS from the build. It means the sources are still there, but aren't build with the whole system. You have to build it yourself with something like: cd /usr/src/bin/cvs make sudo make install Here is the commit mentionning the removal from the build: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/Makefile#rev1.114 Since then the commits on OpenCVS and OpenRCS have been pretty active again, but not yet putted back in the build: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ And OpenCVS.org directs me to http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/. What's the status? The default CVS shipped with OpenBSD it's still GNU CVS. So I wouldn't use OpenCVS unless I wanted to test it and/or improve it.
Re: opencvs weird problem 4.3
You are doing it wrong. Check out the up command for cvs. No, the person in charge doing something wrong is you. If you download the source from an ftp site, there are no CVS/ directories available which would be used by an up command. The use of checkout is obviously even stated on http//www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html. - download de src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz from a ftp. - untar them on /usr/src (tar zxvf file.tar.gz in /usr/src) - cd /usr - opencvs checkout -P -r OPENBSD_4_3 src Can you please tell me if you have run against an anoncvs@ or opencvs@ server? Tobias Stoeckmann
Re: opencvs weird problem 4.3
Erm... [...] there are no CVS/ directories Just link me into the list of people doing things wrong. :) Anyway, running a checkout from /usr for src will fully work and does what is expected (updates the source tree). There is nothing wrong in doing so, although the server should be specified with -d, which also would make it easier to see what the problem might be. Tobias Stoeckmann
Re: opencvs weird problem 4.3
Tobias Stoeckmann escribis: Erm... [...] there are no CVS/ directories Just link me into the list of people doing things wrong. :) Anyway, running a checkout from /usr for src will fully work and does what is expected (updates the source tree). There is nothing wrong in doing so, although the server should be specified with -d, which also would make it easier to see what the problem might be. I run export [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs before the opencvs command. I'm spanish so I need a relative near server to do so. Right know I will try some anoncvs servers to see the results. I deduce it's not a known problem so I will do more tests. thanks for all! -Jesus * Tobias Stoeckmann
Re: opencvs weird problem 4.3
some new info about this issue, the command and the return: [avaricia:/usr] root# time opencvs checkout -P -r OPENBSD_4_3 src ... after about 2 hours without response I get: ... Read from remote host anoncvs.de.openbsd.org: Connection reset by peer opencvs [checkout aborted]: failed to write 65536 bytes thanks for all. -Jesus Jesus Sanchez escribis: Tobias Stoeckmann escribis: Erm... [...] there are no CVS/ directories Just link me into the list of people doing things wrong. :) Anyway, running a checkout from /usr for src will fully work and does what is expected (updates the source tree). There is nothing wrong in doing so, although the server should be specified with -d, which also would make it easier to see what the problem might be. I run export [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs before the opencvs command. I'm spanish so I need a relative near server to do so. Right know I will try some anoncvs servers to see the results. I deduce it's not a known problem so I will do more tests. thanks for all! -Jesus * Tobias Stoeckmann
opencvs weird problem 4.3
Hi list, using stable 4.3. I have a weird behaviour with opencvs and wish to know if it's a known thing. My usual steps to have an up to date OpenBSD source tree is to download the src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz files from a well known ftp server, and then launch a opencvs checkout. I found that opencvs seems to get stuck when the source tree it's checking is already up to date. To reproduce this behaviour from a clean /usr/obj/ and /usr/src/ dirs I do: - download de src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz from a ftp. - untar them on /usr/src (tar zxvf file.tar.gz in /usr/src) - cd /usr - opencvs checkout -P -r OPENBSD_4_3 src Then opencvs updates a few files for me in about 10-12 minutes. Well, from this point lets say I have a nice source tree, then I use the exactly same opencvs again and the process takes several minutes (about 2 hours) without any response, it seems it loops or something similar. Have anyone experienced something similar? google didn't helped me, but also the cvs manual. -Jesus
Re: opencvs weird problem 4.3
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:15:19 +0100 Jesus Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, using stable 4.3. I have a weird behaviour with opencvs and wish to know if it's a known thing. My usual steps to have an up to date OpenBSD source tree is to download the src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz files from a well known ftp server, and then launch a opencvs checkout. I found that opencvs seems to get stuck when the source tree it's checking is already up to date. To reproduce this behaviour from a clean /usr/obj/ and /usr/src/ dirs I do: - download de src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz from a ftp. - untar them on /usr/src (tar zxvf file.tar.gz in /usr/src) - cd /usr - opencvs checkout -P -r OPENBSD_4_3 src Then opencvs updates a few files for me in about 10-12 minutes. Well, from this point lets say I have a nice source tree, then I use the exactly same opencvs again and the process takes several minutes (about 2 hours) without any response, it seems it loops or something similar. Have anyone experienced something similar? google didn't helped me, but also the cvs manual. -Jesus You are doing it wrong. Check out the up command for cvs. - Robert
opencvs anoncvs servers
If you are running an anoncvs server with opencvs installed on it (using the anoncvs.shar file), please contact me off-list. .joris
openCVS
any info on why http://www.opencvs.org/ is down, and how active is this project? thx
Re: openCVS
Le Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:36:48 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a icrit : any info on why http://www.opencvs.org/ is down, and how active is this project? thx http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20080228093414 -- - Nicolas.
opencvs succeeded / 64-bit checkout of xenocara
I believe I encountered the bug referenced here the other day on amd64, checking-out xenocara: http://www.webservertalk.com/archive248-2005-7-1143312.html This is known, it's the infamous 64-bit cvs bug. Some of the fonts in XF4 cause any 64-bit client to allocate too much memory on the server side and fail, it hasn't been debugged/fixed yet. After reading that, I realized that the snapshot I was running had opencvs installed. Trying the exact same command (against a local repository) with opencvs worked perfectly and I had xenocara built in no time. Thanks to the OpenCVS committers for saving the day.
Re: OpenCVS?
a little mdoc -mandoc cvs.1 and there you go ! Oups, nroff -mandoc cvs.1 That works better like this On Jan 26, 2008 8:43 AM, xavier brinon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the man pages of opencvs are cvs.1, cvs.5 (as far as I remember) in the source directory of opencvs On Jan 25, 2008 4:38 PM, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11:57 Sun 20 Jan , Darrin Chandler wrote: On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:31:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2008/01/20 10:15, Unix Fan wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ I'm slighly confused by something if the cvs command in OpenBSD 4.2 is OpenCVS, it isn't - not everything in source is linked to the build yet. However, those interested in using/testing OpenCVS should take a peek at their /usr/src/usr.bin/cvs/README file as a start. The binary gets installed as opencvs, but the manpages as cvs - just in case you're wondering why cvs --help still is GNU CVS, and the manpages are not ;) -- If you don't remember something, it never existed... If you aren't remembered, you never existed... I don't quite understand what love is like... But if there was someone who liked me, I'd be happy.
Re: OpenCVS?
the man pages of opencvs are cvs.1, cvs.5 ans cvsintro.7 (know I remember) in the source directory of opencvs, that is : /usr/src/usr.bin/cvs/ a little mdoc -mandoc cvs.1 and there you go ! On Jan 26, 2008 8:43 AM, xavier brinon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the man pages of opencvs are cvs.1, cvs.5 (as far as I remember) in the source directory of opencvs On Jan 25, 2008 4:38 PM, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11:57 Sun 20 Jan , Darrin Chandler wrote: On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:31:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2008/01/20 10:15, Unix Fan wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ I'm slighly confused by something if the cvs command in OpenBSD 4.2 is OpenCVS, it isn't - not everything in source is linked to the build yet. However, those interested in using/testing OpenCVS should take a peek at their /usr/src/usr.bin/cvs/README file as a start. The binary gets installed as opencvs, but the manpages as cvs - just in case you're wondering why cvs --help still is GNU CVS, and the manpages are not ;) -- If you don't remember something, it never existed... If you aren't remembered, you never existed... I don't quite understand what love is like... But if there was someone who liked me, I'd be happy.
Re: OpenCVS?
the man pages of opencvs are cvs.1, cvs.5 (as far as I remember) in the source directory of opencvs On Jan 25, 2008 4:38 PM, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11:57 Sun 20 Jan , Darrin Chandler wrote: On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:31:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2008/01/20 10:15, Unix Fan wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ I'm slighly confused by something if the cvs command in OpenBSD 4.2 is OpenCVS, it isn't - not everything in source is linked to the build yet. However, those interested in using/testing OpenCVS should take a peek at their /usr/src/usr.bin/cvs/README file as a start. The binary gets installed as opencvs, but the manpages as cvs - just in case you're wondering why cvs --help still is GNU CVS, and the manpages are not ;) -- If you don't remember something, it never existed... If you aren't remembered, you never existed... I don't quite understand what love is like... But if there was someone who liked me, I'd be happy.
Re: OpenCVS?
On 11:57 Sun 20 Jan , Darrin Chandler wrote: On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:31:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2008/01/20 10:15, Unix Fan wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ I'm slighly confused by something if the cvs command in OpenBSD 4.2 is OpenCVS, it isn't - not everything in source is linked to the build yet. However, those interested in using/testing OpenCVS should take a peek at their /usr/src/usr.bin/cvs/README file as a start. The binary gets installed as opencvs, but the manpages as cvs - just in case you're wondering why cvs --help still is GNU CVS, and the manpages are not ;) -- If you don't remember something, it never existed... If you aren't remembered, you never existed... I don't quite understand what love is like... But if there was someone who liked me, I'd be happy.
OpenCVS?
Hi, Just wondering what the status of OpenCVS is. Is it still being actively worked on more or on the back burner for now? Just curious to know. TIA.
Re: OpenCVS?
On 2008/01/20 10:22, Richard Daemon wrote: Just wondering what the status of OpenCVS is. Is it still being actively worked on more or on the back burner for now? See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/
Re: OpenCVS?
Stuart Henderson wrote: See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ I'm slighly confused by something if the cvs command in OpenBSD 4.2 is OpenCVS, why does cvs --help refer to places like cvshome.org for updates etc? -Nix Fan.
Re: OpenCVS?
On 2008/01/20 10:15, Unix Fan wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ I'm slighly confused by something if the cvs command in OpenBSD 4.2 is OpenCVS, it isn't - not everything in source is linked to the build yet.
Re: OpenCVS?
On 20 Jan 2008 10:15:15 -0800, Unix Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ I'm slighly confused by something if the cvs command in OpenBSD 4.2 is OpenCVS, why does cvs --help refer to places like cvshome.org for updates etc? -Nix Fan. Forgot to cc: misc... Sorry. The cvs version shipped with OpenBSD is still GNU CVS, even in -current. -- Pierre Riteau
Re: OpenCVS?
OpenCVS is not compiled or installed by default, yet, but the CVS in src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/ is. Regards, Andreas On 20 Jan 2008 10:15:15 -0800, Unix Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ I'm slighly confused by something if the cvs command in OpenBSD 4.2 is OpenCVS, why does cvs --help refer to places like cvshome.org for updates etc? -Nix Fan. -- Andreas Kahari Somewhere in the general Cambridge area, UK
Re: OpenCVS?
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:31:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2008/01/20 10:15, Unix Fan wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ I'm slighly confused by something if the cvs command in OpenBSD 4.2 is OpenCVS, it isn't - not everything in source is linked to the build yet. However, those interested in using/testing OpenCVS should take a peek at their /usr/src/usr.bin/cvs/README file as a start. -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
Re: OpenCVS?
On 20 Jan 2008 10:15:15 -0800, Unix Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stuart Henderson wrote: See for yourself: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/cvs/ I'm slighly confused by something if the cvs command in OpenBSD 4.2 is OpenCVS, why does cvs --help refer to places like cvshome.org for updates etc? If you take a look at src/usr.bin/Makefile [0], you'll notice that 'cvs' (as well as 'pcc', BTW) is not (yet) connected to the build. The one that is connected is the GNU CVS from src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/. On the other hand, the situation with rcs is different -- OpenRCS was connected to the build before OpenBSD 4.0, and GNU RCS was completely removed from the source tree before OpenBSD 4.1. br, cnst.su. [0] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/Makefile
Re: OpenCVS?
Unix Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there a list of GNU software being installed on my computer? The contents of /usr/src/gnu should give you an idea. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Re: OpenCVS
On 19/09/2007, Adrian Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. When will it be released? Will it be released at the same time as I was wondering this also. I am really looking forward to the release to replace GNU CVS. I think ( I might be wrong ), the code is there in current, but not linked with the build, so you might be-able to test what they have so far. -- Best Regards Edd --- http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
Re: OpenCVS
Le 20 sept. 07 ` 07:10, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor a icrit : On 9/19/07, Adrian Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Who here knows about OpenCVS? 2. How is it used? 3. When will it be released? Will it be released at the same time as 4.2? Regards, A. 1. OpenCVS is developed by several of the OpenBSD developers, those I see commit most is xsa@, niallo@, ray@ and lateley a lot by [EMAIL PROTECTED] You forgot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. It's a replacement for GNU CVS so it's compatiable with it. Their goal is first to make sure everything supported in GNU CVS should be supported in OpenCVS. 3. Do not know about release, probobly not ready for prime time yet. But I'm sure it needs testers, that will speed up the development. Ps. I'm not a developer. ds. br Dunceor
OpenCVS
1. Who here knows about OpenCVS? 2. How is it used? 3. When will it be released? Will it be released at the same time as 4.2? Regards, A.
Re: OpenCVS
On 9/19/07, Adrian Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Who here knows about OpenCVS? 2. How is it used? 3. When will it be released? Will it be released at the same time as 4.2? Regards, A. 1. OpenCVS is developed by several of the OpenBSD developers, those I see commit most is xsa@, niallo@, ray@ and lateley a lot by [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. It's a replacement for GNU CVS so it's compatiable with it. Their goal is first to make sure everything supported in GNU CVS should be supported in OpenCVS. 3. Do not know about release, probobly not ready for prime time yet. But I'm sure it needs testers, that will speed up the development. Ps. I'm not a developer. ds. br Dunceor
Difference between co in OpenCVS and GNU RCS
Hi, I've just upgraded from OpenBSD/i386 3.8 to 4.0 (yeah, I know), and I've run across a difference between the behavior of co in OpenCVS RCS (version 3.6) and GNU RCS (version 5.7, in the ports). Try the following in an empty directory: $ touch foo $ mkdir RCS $ /usr/bin/ci -i foo RCS/foo,v -- foo enter description, terminated with single '.' or end of file: NOTE: This is NOT the log message! . initial revision: 1.1 done $ /usr/bin/co -l RCS/foo,v RCS/foo,v -- RCS/foo,v revision 1.1 (locked) RCS/foo,v exists; remove it? [ny](n): n co: writable RCS/foo,v exists; checkout aborted $ If I do the same thing with GNU RCS, the file is checked out for editing: $ touch foo $ mkdir RCS $ gci -i foo RCS/foo,v -- foo enter description, terminated with single '.' or end of file: NOTE: This is NOT the log message! . initial revision: 1.1 done $ gco -l RCS/foo,v RCS/foo,v -- foo revision 1.1 (locked) done $ The difference causes problems for vc mode in Emacs. I can work around it, but I'm reporting it here in case it is a bug in OpenCVS. I've googled, but nothing relevant came up. Regards, Alan
Re: Difference between co in OpenCVS and GNU RCS
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Alan Watson wrote: Hi, I've just upgraded from OpenBSD/i386 3.8 to 4.0 (yeah, I know), and I've run across a difference between the behavior of co in OpenCVS RCS (version 3.6) and GNU RCS (version 5.7, in the ports). This has been fixed in -current. -Otto Try the following in an empty directory: $ touch foo $ mkdir RCS $ /usr/bin/ci -i foo RCS/foo,v -- foo enter description, terminated with single '.' or end of file: NOTE: This is NOT the log message! . initial revision: 1.1 done $ /usr/bin/co -l RCS/foo,v RCS/foo,v -- RCS/foo,v revision 1.1 (locked) RCS/foo,v exists; remove it? [ny](n): n co: writable RCS/foo,v exists; checkout aborted $ If I do the same thing with GNU RCS, the file is checked out for editing: $ touch foo $ mkdir RCS $ gci -i foo RCS/foo,v -- foo enter description, terminated with single '.' or end of file: NOTE: This is NOT the log message! . initial revision: 1.1 done $ gco -l RCS/foo,v RCS/foo,v -- foo revision 1.1 (locked) done $ The difference causes problems for vc mode in Emacs. I can work around it, but I'm reporting it here in case it is a bug in OpenCVS. I've googled, but nothing relevant came up. Regards, Alan
Re: Difference between co in OpenCVS and GNU RCS
Many thanks. Alan
opencvs after c2k6
I thought it might be nice to give some details about what state opencvs is in after the hackathon. the best way to do this is probably with some examples. so here goes: we need a repository to test on, lets import it: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs -d ~/test/repo import -m initial import misctest misctest misctest_1 N misctest/file1 N misctest/subdir/gahgah No conflicts created by this import. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest now let us check it out again: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test opencvs -d ~/test/repo co misctest U misctest/file1 U misctest/subdir/gahgah [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test okay that went good, lets show off our status command: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs status file1 === File: file1 Status: Up-to-date Working revision:1.1.1.1 Sun Jun 4 15:34:26 2006 Repository revision: 1.1.1.1 /home/joris/test/repo/misctest/file1,v Sticky Tag: (none) Sticky Options: (none) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest awesome, now we modify file1 and will want to commit if of course: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs up M file1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs ci -m i modified file1 file1 Checking in file1: /home/joris/test/repo/misctest/file1,v - file1 old revision: 1.1.1.1; new revision: 1.2 done [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest sweet, that worked but im kinda getting sick of subdir and gahgah: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs remove -f subdir/gahgah [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs up R subdir/gahgah [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs ci -m byebye Checking in subdir/gahgah: /home/joris/test/repo/misctest/subdir/gahgah,v - subdir/gahgah old revision: 1.1.1.1; new revision: Removed done [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest ls CVSfile1 subdir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs up -P [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest ls CVS file1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest showing off add is cool too: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest touch newfile [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs add newfile opencvs add: scheduling file 'newfile' for addition opencvs add: use 'opencvs commit' to add this file permanently [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs ci -m goodday to you sir newfile Checking in newfile: /home/joris/test/repo/misctest/newfile,v - newfile old revision: Non-existent; new revision: 1.1 done [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest so we have modified our repo a bit, lets import a new 'release' into our repository: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs -d ~/test/repo import -m new release misctest misctest misctest_2 C misctest/file1 C misctest/newfile 2 conflicts created by this import. Use the following command to help the merge: opencvs checkout -jmisctest:yesterday -jmisctest misctest [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest well checkout -j isnt working yet so i cannot show you guys that, however i can use diff to see what changed between releases: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest opencvs diff -up -rmisctest_1 -rmisctest_2 file1 Index: file1 === RCS file: /home/joris/test/repo/misctest/file1,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1 retrieving revision 1.1.1.2 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1.1.1 -r1.1.1.2 file1 --- file1 04 Jun 2006 15:34:261.1.1.1 +++ file1 04 Jun 2006 15:47:301.1.1.2 @@ -1 +1,3 @@ file1 +foo foo foo +dkwql; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest that should be about it. let me be clear that not everything that is working is being showed here. all of this is on a local repository we are hacking on remote support right now. why did i send this mail now? well since opencvs is pretty usable in a local setup, people who are brave enough can try it out on local repositories, heck i already use opencvs for everything on my own repositories. if you run into any bugs let us know. i hope you enjoyed the show ;-) .joris
[OpenCVS] what does soon mean?
Hi, I'm interested in the new OpenCVS project and would like to when it's to be released. I know you can't poste an exact date but for a while this phrase is at the homepage: OpenCVS is to be released soon. So what does soon mean? Does this mean one week, one mounth, a half year or whatever. It would be nice to know about when it's to be released so I can decide if I should use the old GNU CVS or if I should wait for a public stable release. Best regards, Stefan PS: Please don't think about this mail like a troll-flaming-mail, it's a serious question and important to me!
Re: [OpenCVS] what does soon mean?
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 08:22:19PM +0200, Stefan wrote: OpenCVS is to be released soon. So what does soon mean? Does this mean one week, one mounth, a half year or whatever. http://nedbsd.nl/modules/static/page/JorisVinkInterview More can be found via google. No time plans mentioned, but recently there were lots of activities on it, according to the cvs-changes. Ciao, Kili -- How do I read this file? - You uudecode it. - I I I decode it?
Re: [OpenCVS] what does soon mean?
On 4/9/06, Stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be nice to know about when it's to be released so I can decide if I should use the old GNU CVS or if I should wait for a public stable release. Everything one could read in the past time about the project suggests you can start out with GNU CVS and easily switch later to OpenCVS. --knitti
Re: [OpenCVS] what does soon mean?
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 10:38:13PM +0200, knitti wrote: On 4/9/06, Stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be nice to know about when it's to be released so I can decide if I should use the old GNU CVS or if I should wait for a public stable release. Everything one could read in the past time about the project suggests you can start out with GNU CVS and easily switch later to OpenCVS. there's also /usr/src/usr.bin/cvs/README if you wanted to see where things are now, check it out, etc. -- jared [ openbsd 3.9-current GENERIC ( mar 15 ) // i386 ]
Re: OpenCVS Questions
On 11/5/05, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was looking to learn more about OpenCVS, in particular, reading the cvsintro docs mentioned here: http://www.opencvs.org/manual.html Unfortunately the links are broken. Could someone drop-kick me in the right direction? I need to (better) learn both CVS usage and CVS setup/administration. Based on what Tedu suggested please see if this will be of any help for now http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/cvsbook.html :-) kind regards Siju -- Siju Oommen George, Network Consultant. HiFX IT MEDIA SERVICES PVT. LTD. http://www.hifx.net
OpenCVS Questions
I was looking to learn more about OpenCVS, in particular, reading the cvsintro docs mentioned here: http://www.opencvs.org/manual.html Unfortunately the links are broken. Could someone drop-kick me in the right direction? I need to (better) learn both CVS usage and CVS setup/administration. Thanks, JCR
Re: OpenCVS Questions
On 11/4/05, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.opencvs.org/manual.html Unfortunately the links are broken. Could someone drop-kick me in the right direction? I need to (better) learn both CVS usage and CVS setup/administration. typing things like cvs, cvs book, and cvs intro into google should get you started.
Re: OpenCVS Questions
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:17:29PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote: I was looking to learn more about OpenCVS, in particular, reading the cvsintro docs mentioned here: http://www.opencvs.org/manual.html OpenCVS is not yet released and still under development. Unfortunately the links are broken. Could someone drop-kick me in the right direction? I need to (better) learn both CVS usage and CVS setup/administration. As always, try the manual page. It will point you to 'info cvs', which should give a good overview. Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Re: OpenCVS Questions
J.C. Roberts wrote: I was looking to learn more about OpenCVS, in particular, reading the While OpenCVS isn't ready, yet, reading the contents of the cvs-guide package (located in books/cvs-guide in the ports tree) is very educational. OpenCVS will probably work in similar ways (I haven't tried it, yet.) Moritz
OpenCVS architecture
Hi Bsd's lovers, I would like to set up a public cvs server with read/write and anonymous access. So I googled and have found a howto that describe the setup with openssh. http://www.pointless.nl/~peter/stuff/cvs-server.html I find the proposed way very interested because the authentication is made with an OpenSSH server and not with cvs directly but I still get a problem. You can find below a little ( and simplified ) network diagram on which I am working : firewall | OpenBSD 3.7 ( DMZ ) | firewall | FreeBSD 5.x The method involves that cvs and sshd run on the same machine and that's a problem for me. In my network configuration, the DMZ doesn't contain any production data. We only have proxy machines ( Bind,Apache,... ) that validates the traffic and forwards it to the lan. So in this case, I should have a jail OpenSSH server hosted in the DMZ ( OpenBSD machine ) that sould connect with a cvs (CVSROOT) hosted on the lan ( FreeBSD machines ... ). I just immagine to store the CVSROOT on a NFS share that I could mount from the DMZ but I haven't found anything else until now. So are there people having such experience with this matter. Is that possible to solve this situation with OpenCVS ??? Thanks to help me. Regards Vincent.
OpenCVS - Some questions
Hello everybody, Are there some features GNU CVS dosn't contain? During reading the Project-Goals of OpenCVS I noticed (ofcourse) the first Goal: - Stay as compatible as possible with GNU cvs without compromising the security of the system. - So can we exspect some neat options GNU-CVS dosn't provide? Maybe also some speed ups? I personaly noticed that cvsync is serval times faster compared to AnonCVS. Kind regards, Sebastian -- Don't buy anything from YeongYang. Their Computercases are expensiv, they WTX-powersuplies start burning and their support refuse any RMA even there's still some warenty.
Re: OpenCVS - Some questions
Hi, On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:32:32PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So can we exspect some neat options GNU-CVS dosn't provide? This interview has some info: http://nedbsd.nl/modules/static/page/JorisVinkInterview
Will OpenCVS be include 3.8
For about ~2 Months I read OpenCVS is to be released soon so I asked myself: Will OpenCVS be part of OpenBSD 3.8? Kind regards, Sebastian -- Don't buy anything from YeongYang. Their Computercases are expensiv, they WTX-powersuplies start burning and their support refuse any RMA even there's still some warenty.
Re: Will OpenCVS be include 3.8
On 02/09/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For about ~2 Months I read OpenCVS is to be released soon so I asked myself: Will OpenCVS be part of OpenBSD 3.8? Kind regards, Sebastian -- Don't buy anything from YeongYang. Their Computercases are expensiv, they WTX-powersuplies start burning and their support refuse any RMA even there's still some warenty. No. It's not ready yet.
Re: OpenCVS interview
2005/8/3, Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:01:48PM +0200, Wijnand Wiersma wrote: The interview is at http://nedbsd.nl/modules/static/page/JorisVinkInterview | Anything you want to add to this interview? | | Humppa! I wonder wether the 3.8 song will be Humppa style. Seems to be some kind of hype nowadays. That would be nice :-)
Re: OpenCVS vs subversion
I think OpenCVS will deal with several limitations of CVS. I think the OpenBSD folks are the right persons to deal with this. Wijnand
