Hi,
On Tue, 13.10.2009 at 16:41:35 +0200, Igor Sobrado igor.sobr...@gmail.com
wrote:
requirements come first, then you can choose the best tools to get
that work done, not the reverse. why is it so difficult to
understand?
well... short story: Your definition of better may or may not meet
Hi,
On Tue, 13.10.2009 at 11:33:40 -0400, and...@msu.edu and...@msu.edu wrote:
The problem with this is that the interface between the other OS and the
OpenBSD based code needs to be correct and secure, else there will be
bugs and people will complain that OpenBSD code isn't good, etc and in
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:12:04 +0200
Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
and there's a reason why it is that way - I always found the idea of
making a bgp router out of a common unix box by adding a userland bgp
speaker only flawed. many things can only properly or at all be done
at
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:59:08AM +0200, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:12:04 +0200
Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
and there's a reason why it is that way - I always found the idea of
making a bgp router out of a common unix box by adding a userland bgp
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
the scope and effort involved in getting OpenBGPd onto Linux. I'll
look at the OpenSSH project to see how the portability is added
without cluttering up the
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
the scope and effort involved in getting OpenBGPd onto Linux. I'll
look at the OpenSSH
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
| I don't see the point in porting this to linux. Why settle for second-best
| ?
|
|
| Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for an OS
| that is the OS of choice of millions of users and thousands of
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
the scope and effort
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
the scope and effort
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ross Cameron abal...@gmail.com wrote:
Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for an OS
that is the OS of choice of millions of users and thousands of corporations?
users and corporations should learn how to choose the operating
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
the scope and effort
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Igor Sobrado igor.sobr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ross Cameron abal...@gmail.com wrote:
Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for an
OS
that is the OS of choice of millions of users and thousands of
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:41:35PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ross Cameron abal...@gmail.com wrote:
Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for an OS
that is the OS of choice of millions of users and thousands of corporations?
Quoting Ross Cameron ross.came...@linuxpro.co.za:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Igor Sobrado
igor.sobr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ross Cameron abal...@gmail.com wrote:
Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for
an
OS
that is the OS
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Barry Friedman wrote:
Hi, thanks
In my case it has nothing to do with whether or not millions of people
use a particular OS but simply that I am constrained to Linux for this
project and it is non-negotiable. So I could use that as an excuse to
ignore OpenBGPd but I think it's a nice BGP implementation and I think
it may be
Cool. Thanks for the excellent info.
Regards,
Barry
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
In my case it has nothing to do with whether or not millions of people
use a particular OS but simply that I am constrained to Linux for this
project and it is
Hi, I'm looking at open source BGP implementations for possible use on
a Linux-based system. I'm interested in OpenBGPd and I understand that
it's part of OpenBSD but in the application that I'm looking at the
only choice I am given is Linux. My questions are:
Are there any projects to create an
Hi,
it only works on OpenBSD and any efforts to port it to FreeBSD or
Linux weren't really successful. The reason is that OpenBSD's routing
daemons heavilly utilize the kernel's routing stack that has many
interfaces and features that are not available in and is not
compatible to other OSes.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 08:12:41PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
Hi,
it only works on OpenBSD and any efforts to port it to FreeBSD or
Linux weren't really successful. The reason is that OpenBSD's routing
daemons heavilly utilize the kernel's routing stack that has many
interfaces and
* Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com [2009-10-13 00:09]:
While true this is mostly the reason because nobody from outside came
towards us trying to come up with a portable OpenBGPD similar to the one
done for OpenSSH. Neither I nor Henning have the time and nerves to fiddle
around with
* Barry Friedman friedman.ba...@gmail.com [2009-10-12 19:52]:
Hi, I'm looking at open source BGP implementations for possible use on
a Linux-based system. I'm interested in OpenBGPd and I understand that
it's part of OpenBSD but in the application that I'm looking at the
only choice I am given
Hi, thanks everyone for the information, this helps give me an idea of
the scope and effort involved in getting OpenBGPd onto Linux. I'll
look at the OpenSSH project to see how the portability is added
without cluttering up the OpenBSD code.
Also I am sorry, I did not mean to imply that OpenBGPd
23 matches
Mail list logo
