Shane J Pearson wrote:
You find a lot of things obvious for a guy who is so presumptuous.
For the record, I respect the intentions of RMS and I highly respect
the intentions and practical thinking of Theo, the OpenBSD project,
the developers and much of the user base. I've been enjoying
So... RMS vs. TdR in a hot jello grudge match... who comes out on top?
Sorry, sometimes I just can't help myself. For the most part, this
whole thread seems just that silly.
Breen,
On 13/10/2006, at 1:20 AM, Breen Ouellette wrote:
Hmm. Let's see. Jack's original post is listed in its entirety
below. I do not see any quotes around the word interesting. If you
read it then you may agree that his meaning is obvious, you may not.
I replied to this...
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Shane J Pearson wrote:
By interesting, you mean one is well meaning, but a little kooky
and not always in touch with reality and the other is focused and
committed to maintaining some sanity in the world of computing?
No, I didn't
On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Breen Ouellette wrote:
PS - Jack, some friendly advice, you are only encouraging them each
time you reply. They obviously don't care about why you find
interest in this subject. They only want to find a way to link you
to RMS and then trash you.
Thanks,
Breen,
Quoting Breen Ouellette [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PS - Jack, some friendly advice, you are only encouraging them each time
you reply. They obviously don't care about why you find interest in this
subject. They only want to find a way to link you to RMS and then trash you.
I wasn't trying to
Breen,
I am replying to this in full because I want my intentions known.
I'll leave it at this.
On 12/10/2006, at 2:58 AM, Breen Ouellette wrote:
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Shane J Pearson wrote:
By interesting, you mean one is well meaning, but a little
kooky
7 matches
Mail list logo
