On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Andy wrote:
> We've all 'written' things that get misinterpreted.. context is often lost
> in written language ;)
>
Which is a good reminder to think before you press send on that email.
--
chs
We've all 'written' things that get misinterpreted.. context is often
lost in written language ;)
On Mon 03 Feb 2014 17:05:25 GMT, Adam Jensen wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:57:28 +
Andy wrote:
Please realise who you are talking to and learn to treat this
community with respect whether t
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:57:28 +
Andy wrote:
> Please realise who you are talking to and learn to treat this
> community with respect whether they're a first time user, or a
> lead dev..
>
Despite the contextual irony, that seems like a good point.
Thanks!
Claudio is one of the main developers and contributers to OpenBSD and
does what he does for free for fun like all the devs, so we can go to
work and get paid..
Please realise who you are talking to and learn to treat this community
with respect whether they're a first time user, or a lead dev.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:18:30AM -0500, Adam Jensen wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:15:39 -0500
> Brad Smith wrote:
>
> > Enough is enough. Just drop it. Of course people are
> > going to start making fun of this non issue.
> >
>
> How bizarre. I'm sorry the discussion has offended you but I
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:15:39 -0500
Brad Smith wrote:
> Enough is enough. Just drop it. Of course people are
> going to start making fun of this non issue.
>
How bizarre. I'm sorry the discussion has offended you but I
don't think your commands have any authority. If it's a delicate
topic, perha
On 02/02/14 1:50 PM, Adam Jensen wrote:
On Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:18:06 + (UTC)
na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
Miod Vallat wrote:
i386-donatetoopenbsdfoundationtoday-openbsd5.4?
or i386-bikeshed-openbsd.
What is the string equivalent of goatse or tubgirl?
Maybe somet
On Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:18:06 + (UTC)
na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> Miod Vallat wrote:
>
> > > i386-donatetoopenbsdfoundationtoday-openbsd5.4?
> >
> > or i386-bikeshed-openbsd.
>
> What is the string equivalent of goatse or tubgirl?
>
Maybe something simple that distin
Miod Vallat wrote:
> > i386-donatetoopenbsdfoundationtoday-openbsd5.4?
>
> or i386-bikeshed-openbsd.
What is the string equivalent of goatse or tubgirl?
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
> i386-donatetoopenbsdfoundationtoday-openbsd5.4?
or i386-bikeshed-openbsd.
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:43:15 +0100
j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) wrote:
> >> > Maybe we can just leave it.
> >>
> >> Indeed.
> >>
> >
> > Well, at least you didn't call it a bikeshed issue (though,
> > that probably would have been a more compelling statement).
>
> Fine: I call thi
Adam Jensen writes:
> On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:19:50 +0100
> j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) wrote:
>
>> > Maybe we can just leave it.
>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>
> Well, at least you didn't call it a bikeshed issue (though, that
> probably would have been a more compelling statement).
Fine: I
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:19:50 +0100
j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) wrote:
> > Maybe we can just leave it.
>
> Indeed.
>
Well, at least you didn't call it a bikeshed issue (though, that
probably would have been a more compelling statement).
na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) writes:
[...]
> Maybe we can just leave it.
Indeed.
--
jca | PGP: 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
(previous: 0x06A11494 / 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494)
i386-donatetoopenbsdfoundationtoday-openbsd5.4?
. Ken
On 2 February 2014 12:10, Adam Jensen wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2014 16:17:08 + (UTC)
> na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
>
>> At least it's consistent. FreeBSD's collection of
>> -undermydesk- (gcc)
>> -marcel- (gd
On Sun, 2 Feb 2014 16:17:08 + (UTC)
na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> At least it's consistent. FreeBSD's collection of
> -undermydesk- (gcc)
> -marcel- (gdb)
> -unknown- (clang, binutils, occasionally in ports)
> -portbld- (most ports)
> would never confuse anybody,
Marc Espie wrote:
> But there are things that actually use the "unknown". Most notorious being
> gcc.
Hmm... no?
I'm too lazy to compile a gcc port on FreeBSD now, but as far as I can
tell, it just uses...
.if ${ARCH} == "amd64"
CONFIGURE_TARGET= x86_64-portbld-${OPSYS:L}${OSREL}
.else
CO
Adam Jensen wrote:
> > FreeBSD is more playful: It has ${ARCH}-portbld-freebsd
> > ${OSREL} in its ports tree and ...
>
> I wonder how the FreeBSD guys changed it "without breaking every
> gnu-configure script in existence".
They didn't. I think espie is simply mistaken. FreeBSD has a check
w
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 04:23:22AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 07:11:25PM -0500, Adam Jensen wrote:
> > On Sat, 1 Feb 2014 00:52:31 + (UTC)
> > na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> >
> > > FreeBSD is more playful: It has ${ARCH}-portbld-
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 00:23:18 -0500
Brad Smith wrote:
> The way it is generated can be changed very easily and contrary
> to the previous comment it doesn't break all autoconf scripts
Will you share your technique?
> that use the triplet. But there is no purpose for doing so. OMG
> something I d
On 01/02/14 11:18 PM, Adam Jensen wrote:
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 22:06:47 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
Well, that's true. If the admin cares about the value in
X-Mailer, the admin should configure a better value.
Patching the various occurrences of this string might be more
cumbersome than changing
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 07:11:25PM -0500, Adam Jensen wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2014 00:52:31 + (UTC)
> na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
>
> > FreeBSD is more playful: It has ${ARCH}-portbld-freebsd
> > ${OSREL} in its ports tree and ...
> >
>
> I wonder how the FreeBSD guys cha
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 22:06:47 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
> Well, that's true. If the admin cares about the value in
> X-Mailer, the admin should configure a better value.
>
Patching the various occurrences of this string might be more
cumbersome than changing the way it's generated and used
throug
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 19:11, Adam Jensen wrote:
> It shows up in so many places, even my email headers:
>
> X-Mailer:Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.20; i386-unknown-openbsd5.4)
>
> To the uninitiated masses, it might seem like the system was
> sloppily configured or in some other way the admin was
On Sat, 1 Feb 2014 00:52:31 + (UTC)
na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> FreeBSD is more playful: It has ${ARCH}-portbld-freebsd
> ${OSREL} in its ports tree and ...
>
I wonder how the FreeBSD guys changed it "without breaking every
gnu-configure script in existence".
It shows
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 06:18:44PM -0500, Adam Jensen wrote:
> I see the string "i386-unknown-openbsd5.4" in various places throughout
> my system. What does the "unknown" part of this string refer to and is
> there a canonical way to set it to something more meaningful?
>
> Thanks!
Ah, but then
Adam Jensen wrote:
> I see the string "i386-unknown-openbsd5.4" in various places throughout
> my system. What does the "unknown" part of this string refer to and is
> there a canonical way to set it to something more meaningful?
It is largely meaningless. Historically, it was used to distingui
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 18:18, Adam Jensen wrote:
> I see the string "i386-unknown-openbsd5.4" in various places throughout
> my system. What does the "unknown" part of this string refer to and is
> there a canonical way to set it to something more meaningful?
It means nothing. 900 years ago someb
I see the string "i386-unknown-openbsd5.4" in various places throughout
my system. What does the "unknown" part of this string refer to and is
there a canonical way to set it to something more meaningful?
Thanks!
29 matches
Mail list logo
