On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 08:49:09PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
On the other hand, realize that no one asked you in the first place,
you provided your list voluntarily (without even being prompted by a
single 'so?'). No one asked you to defend your opinion. Anyway, you
should care why Joachim
On 6/18/06, Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Guenther wrote:
You are angry, understandably.
Why do you assume I am angry? I am not. Don't you know how uncivil
it is to make assumptions on other peoples emotions?
You've put a lot of work into your system and now you're being
told
On 6/17/06, Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siju George wrote:
Hope you will find this interesting :-) Haven't tried this out
but am currently preparing a system for it.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/c4o/
Cheers! Let me know how it works for you.
Too many mistake these days :-(
Marc Balmer dixit:
what's next?
The MirPorts Framework already runs on OpenBSD and Mac OSX, in addition
to being the native package source for MirOS BSD. (It also works on In-
terix aka MS Services for Unix 3.5, but that's currently not supported.
It will come when time permits, though.)
bye,
On Sunday 18 June 2006 05:56, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:29:29PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
None the less, Han is free to work on whatever he wants. Han has been
kind enough to share his efforts with you and everyone but instead of
saying thanks, you tell him is work
and C++, the Pkgfiles which define how a
package should be build are nothing but simple shell-scripts.
Cruxports for OpenBSD is a port/rewrite of the CRUX ports-system
to OpenBSD, and is completely written in sh, except for a simple
parser written in C.
Now I hear you say: What's wrong
Joachim Schipper wrote:
Now I hear you say: What's wrong with the normal ports?
Well... wrong is a big word. It's just a matter of personal
preference I think. But let me give you a list of reasons why I
prefer cruxports.
[ snip: my reasons, with your opinion about them ]
All in all,
On 6/18/06, Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joachim Schipper wrote:
Now I hear you say: What's wrong with the normal ports?
Well... wrong is a big word. It's just a matter of personal
preference I think. But let me give you a list of reasons why I
prefer cruxports.
[ snip: my
Nick Guenther wrote:
You are angry, understandably.
Why do you assume I am angry? I am not. Don't you know how uncivil
it is to make assumptions on other peoples emotions?
You've put a lot of work into your system and now you're being
told it's useless.
I don't care if he thinks that.
On
packagemanager in perl's CPAN.
Now, I also think porting cruxports to OpenBSD is rather pointless and futile
but hey, it's not my time that is being wasted.
---
Lars Hansson
Hi all,
Hope you will find this interesting :-)
Haven't tried this out but am currently preparing a system for it.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/c4o/
Kind Regards
--
Siju Oommen George, Network Consultant. HiFX IT MEDIA SERVICES PVT.
LTD. http://www.hifx.net
* Han Boetes wrote:
I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
this is about the most idiotic wast of time I ever heard of. what is
wrong with our own package
On 6/17/06, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Han Boetes wrote:
I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
this is about the most idiotic wast of time I
Siju George wrote:
On 6/17/06, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Han Boetes wrote:
I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
this is about
* Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-17 13:32]:
One think I would like to use would be a utility like FreeBSD's
portupgrade ( with upgraded ports tree ofcourse ) to easily upgrade
installed ports. Don't know how easy it would be to make with our
ports system.
huh? afaik, that tool is one
On 6/17/06, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most updated software version
must be synonymous with
the latest bugs.
Which are better, the old familiar bugs you know about
or the new improved bugs nobody's heard of?
Ok Tony take this case.
there is a software called foo
suppose
Thankyou so much for your response Henning :-)
On 6/17/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-17 13:32]:
One think I would like to use would be a utility like FreeBSD's
portupgrade ( with upgraded ports tree ofcourse ) to easily upgrade
installed
On 6/17/06, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is a software called foo
suppose 3.9 installs foo.1.1.1 if you use ports.
now a few security holes are found in foo.1.1.1
So the foo developers release foo.1.1.2
And the foo developers *strongly encourage* everybody running
foo.1.1.1 to
Siju George wrote:
there is a software called foo
suppose 3.9 installs foo.1.1.1 if you use ports.
now a few security holes are found in foo.1.1.1
So the foo developers release foo.1.1.2
And the foo developers *strongly encourage* everybody running
foo.1.1.1 to upgrade to foo.1.1.2 as soon
On 6/17/06, Eric Faurot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/17/06, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is a software called foo
suppose 3.9 installs foo.1.1.1 if you use ports.
now a few security holes are found in foo.1.1.1
So the foo developers release foo.1.1.2
And the foo
On 6/17/06, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thankyou so much for your response Henning :-)
On 6/17/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-17 13:32]:
One think I would like to use would be a utility like FreeBSD's
portupgrade ( with
On Saturday 17 June 2006 22:21, Siju George wrote:
# echo $PKG_PATH
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/
#
# pkg_add -uF mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.1
Error from ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/:
Unknown command.
Using pkg_add correctly helps. -F takes a
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 07:51:15PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
it didn't update my packages. Could someone please tell me what I missed
out?
Did you read pkg_add(1)? '-F' requires _keywords_, not package
names, as its option.
# echo $PKG_PATH
Marc Balmer wrote:
* Han Boetes wrote:
I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
this is about the most idiotic wast of time I ever heard of. what is
Breen Ouellette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc Balmer wrote:
* Han Boetes wrote:
I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
this is about the most idiotic
Siju George wrote:
it didn't update my packages. Could someone please tell me what I missed
out?
# echo $PKG_PATH
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/
#
# pkg_add -uF mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.1
Error from ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/:
Unknown command.
Hi,
On Saturday, 17. June 2006 18:36, Deanna Phillips wrote:
...
As I see it, this is an example of working _against_ a project
instead of with and for it. A personal NIH syndrome, if you
will. It's not just some Linux thing he put together that also
works here. Look at his quote:
Tobias Weisserth wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday, 17. June 2006 18:36, Deanna Phillips wrote:
...
As I see it, this is an example of working _against_ a project
instead of with and for it. A personal NIH syndrome, if you
will. It's not just some Linux thing he put together that also
works
Siju George wrote:
Hope you will find this interesting :-) Haven't tried this out
but am currently preparing a system for it.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/c4o/
Cheers! Let me know how it works for you.
# Han
* Han Boetes wrote:
Siju George wrote:
Hope you will find this interesting :-) Haven't tried this out
but am currently preparing a system for it.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/c4o/
Cheers! Let me know how it works for you.
It's so full of defects that I guess (hope) no one will
Marc Balmer wrote:
* Han Boetes wrote:
Siju George wrote:
Hope you will find this interesting :-) Haven't tried this out
but am currently preparing a system for it.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/c4o/
Cheers! Let me know how it works for you.
It's so full of defects that
* Han Boetes wrote:
Yes, I love you too.
too? I don't love you...
Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat 17.Jun'06 at 22:23:50 +0200
* Han Boetes wrote:
Yes, I love you too.
too? I don't love you...
Marc, please stop being a prick.
--
Thordur I. Bjornsson
Philosophy is to the real world as masturbation is to sex.
-- Karl Marx
Marc Balmer wrote:
* Han Boetes wrote:
Yes, I love you too.
too? I don't love you...
Please, stop being a fool.
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 09:10:48 +0200, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Han Boetes wrote:
I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
this is about the most
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:29:29PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
None the less, Han is free to work on whatever he wants. Han has been
kind enough to share his efforts with you and everyone but instead of
saying thanks, you tell him is work is an idiotic waste of time.
JCR: You said what I was
please read on:
In 2000 Per Liden started CRUX-Linux, a distro based on
simplicity. The idea for the ports system was influenced by BSD
ports, but written in sh and C++, the Pkgfiles which define how a
package should be build are nothing but simple shell-scripts.
Cruxports for OpenBSD is a port
37 matches
Mail list logo
