Ter, 2007-01-30 C s 16:44 +0100, Pierre-Yves Ritschard escreveu:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:20:42 +
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Promising, it does say that it's now part of the OpenBSD system, but
> > sine when? CURRENT? I can't seem to find it in the 4.0 CD's...
> >
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:20:42 +
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ter, 2007-01-30 `s 14:25 +0100, Pierre-Yves Ritschard escreveu:
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:06:00 +
> > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > By the way, what do you use/recommend in
Ter, 2007-01-30 C s 14:25 +0100, Pierre-Yves Ritschard escreveu:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:06:00 +
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > By the way, what do you use/recommend in order to manage the webserver
> > pool? 1 test/min (in cron for instance) is too large a value fo
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:36:12PM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
> >On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
> >Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
> >>the SYN to one of my webservers, and the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:06:00 +
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, what do you use/recommend in order to manage the webserver
> pool? 1 test/min (in cron for instance) is too large a value for many
> use cases, so what would be best in your opinion?
>
> It's likel
On 2007/01/30 13:06, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> By the way, what do you use/recommend in order to manage the webserver
> pool?
hoststated.
Seg, 2007-01-29 C s 09:54 -0700, Bob Beck escreveu:
> I'm not using NAT, my load balancer looks like this:
>
> web2# more /etc/pf/webmail_servers
(...)
> pf.conf:
>
> table persist file "/etc/pf/webmail_servers"
> WEBMAIL_IP = "{129.128.98.89}"
> rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp to $WEBMAIL_IP
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:09:46AM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
|
| requests go like this:
| origin -> balancer -> destination
|
| replies like this:
| destination -> origin
This sounds a lot like what certain loadbalancers call "DSR" or
"Direct Server Return". Basically, this is layer 2 NAT'ing.
Hej Stuart,
Stuart Henderson schrieb:
On 2007/01/29 16:21, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Is there any possible way to get the real ip addresses in my apache
access log?
Readers who didn't see the earlier posts about setting this up, they're
here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=1169052
Henning Brauer schrieb:
* Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 18:46]:
Ah... there we go.
I can't setup the webservers with their default gateway to my load
balancer. The boxes are dedicated servers and I have no possibility to
change the network settings.
These are rented servers (d
Hej Bob,
Bob Beck schrieb:
* Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 09:49]:
Hi OpenBSD'lers,
I'm about to use OpenBSD's pf(4) for load balancing some webservers. So
far, everything is looking just perfect.
Compared to pound, pf(4) is incredibly fast with few CPU and memory usage.
So
* Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 18:46]:
> Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
> >On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
> >Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
> >>the SYN to one of my webservers, and the webser
Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
the SYN to one of my webservers, and the webserver would send a
SYN-ACK back to me. But my machine, obviously can't do a
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:51 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
> > Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
> >> the SYN to one
Hi,
Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:21:13 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote ip
of the
* Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 09:49]:
> Hi OpenBSD'lers,
>
> I'm about to use OpenBSD's pf(4) for load balancing some webservers. So
> far, everything is looking just perfect.
> Compared to pound, pf(4) is incredibly fast with few CPU and memory usage.
> So I'd say: Thats great
Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:51 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could also do an ugly hack which would consist of attaching a
second network on your servers and load balancers (provided they are in
the same (v)?lan) like 172.16.1.0/24 and use tha
Hej Berk,
Berk D. Demir schrieb:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote ip
of the request.
This is, to my knowledge, due to the fact that
On 2007/01/29 16:21, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Is there any possible way to get the real ip addresses in my apache
> access log?
Readers who didn't see the earlier posts about setting this up, they're
here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=116905272009036&w=2
- it's not the standard s
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
> the SYN to one of my webservers, and the webserver would send a
> SYN-ACK back to me. But my machine, obviously can't do anything with
> a SYN-ACK
Marian Hettwer wrote:
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote ip of
the request.
This is, to my knowledge, due to the fact that pf(4) is working on the
TCP layer
Marian Hettwer wrote:
Hi OpenBSD'lers,
I'm about to use OpenBSD's pf(4) for load balancing some webservers.
So far, everything is looking just perfect.
Compared to pound, pf(4) is incredibly fast with few CPU and memory
usage.
So I'd say: Thats great :)
However, one thing is bothering me.
Ob
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:21:13 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, one thing is bothering me.
> Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
> only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote ip
> of the request.
Why are you rewriting
Gregory Edigarov schrieb:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
Okay... anybody with any usable suggestions?
There's the X-Forwarded-to Information in a http header, which can be
set via some software load balancers. However, those are operating on
the application layer, which pf isn't... too bad.
Uhmm...
Hi OpenBSD'lers,
I'm about to use OpenBSD's pf(4) for load balancing some webservers. So
far, everything is looking just perfect.
Compared to pound, pf(4) is incredibly fast with few CPU and memory usage.
So I'd say: Thats great :)
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache acces
25 matches
Mail list logo
