Paul
Yep, that is definitely the authorative source.
I've been using archive.org for a couple decades that I forget openbsd.org
website uses CVS.
73
On February 8, 2022 9:11:56 AM MST, Paul de Weerd wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 08:54:08AM -0700, deich...@placebonol.com wrote:
>| Try
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 08:54:08AM -0700, deich...@placebonol.com wrote:
| Try archive.org for older versions of openbsd.org.
Or just the CVS repository. The openbsd.org website is under revision
control, there's 26 years of history available over at
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/www/
You
Try archive.org for older versions of openbsd.org.
On February 8, 2022 8:39:46 AM MST, Ibsen S Ripsbusker
wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 8, 2022, at 15:25, Nick Holland wrote:
>> Probably be one of these two pages, I think:
>>
>> https://www.openbsd.org/goals.html
>> https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
>>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022, at 15:25, Nick Holland wrote:
> Probably be one of these two pages, I think:
>
> https://www.openbsd.org/goals.html
> https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
>
> I call it the "Microsoft Question": which do you fear more?
> 1) That MS uses your code and profits from your work
>
On 2/6/22 11:57 PM, Ibsen S Ripsbusker wrote:
My great and good friends,
Like 20 years ago while trying to install OpenBSD
for the first time I read a short passage in OpenBSD
documentation that I really liked. Does anyone know
where I can find it?
The passage that said very directly that we
My great and good friends,
Like 20 years ago while trying to install OpenBSD
for the first time I read a short passage in OpenBSD
documentation that I really liked. Does anyone know
where I can find it?
The passage that said very directly that we license OpenBSD
permissively because we know our
Hello,
I'm a mail administrator for a student group at my alma mater, RIT.
We're not particularly satisfied with our current greylisting software
(gld), and the best alternative (hell, the best greylisting software,
hands down) is spamd.
Unfortunately, none of the other sysadmins want to
On 2013-06-22, William Orr w...@worrbase.com wrote:
I currently have an untested (I'm going to spin up some EC2 instances to
do testing this weekend) start on a port to linux on GitHub:
https://github.com/worr/spamd
So my questions:
Is there anything else I need to do to make sure that I'm
Hi,
I'm thinking about creating a community ad for
http://meta.unix.stackexchange.com/q/1105/9454 for OpenBSD with an
image from http://www.openbsd.org/art2.html
One of the conditions is that the images must be uploaded to their
network (via imgur), which requires a licensing as CC-BY-SA
://meta.unix.stackexchange.com/q/1105/9454 for OpenBSD with an
image from http://www.openbsd.org/art2.html
One of the conditions is that the images must be uploaded to their
network (via imgur), which requires a licensing as CC-BY-SA.
This doesn't seem to be compatible with http://www.openbsd.org/art2.html
Most
2013/2/22 Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org:
It is not allowed.
I thought the same.
So https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Openbsd2.svg is really a violation?
Best
Martin
On 2013 Jan 07 (Mon) at 23:50:04 -0800 (-0800), noah pugsley wrote:
So what? This is radically off-topic, please don't bring this kind of
crap to misc@.
--
You may be sure that when a man begins to call himself a realist, he
is preparing to do something he is secretly ashamed of doing.
Hi!
I have a question about the license for bcrypt.c. The OpenBSD policy
page (http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html) says:
Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term (the advertising term) on 22 July
1999. Verbatim copies of the Berkeley license in the OpenBSD tree have
that term removed. In addition,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:23:13AM -0700, Aaron Patterson wrote:
Hi!
I have a question about the license for bcrypt.c. The OpenBSD policy
page (http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html) says:
Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term (the advertising term) on 22 July
1999. Verbatim copies of the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 06:28:21PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:23:13AM -0700, Aaron Patterson wrote:
Hi!
I have a question about the license for bcrypt.c. The OpenBSD policy
page (http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html) says:
Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term
I have a question about the license for bcrypt.c. The OpenBSD policy
page (http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html) says:
Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term (the advertising term) on 22 July
1999. Verbatim copies of the Berkeley license in the OpenBSD tree have
that term removed.
That
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:57:40 -0600 Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, did umplawny have the original right to put his restricted
code into a project that was much more loosely licensed?
If he did not, can I use his improperly licensed code (ie. does he
forfeit his license by
licensing on everything, can
I then ask for addition to the tree?
Or should I just neatly post to ports@ and see what happens?
Sure, you could have figured all this out on your own with enough study,
but even if you did, you'd still need a good lawyer to look it over, as
well as *still* need
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:52:55 -0600
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
There's non-free software in the ports tree.
Not in a real sense. The ports tree is a build infrastructure
containing Makefiles, lists of files and where they should go, and (in
a perfect world, continously
(or ask for) it to be added to the
OpenBSD ports tree.
What about a completely unrelated project?
I do not understand your question.
If I have clean licensing on everything, can
I then ask for addition to the tree?
Of course you can ask, and if the port is both well done and well
tested
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:25 PM, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.orgwrote:
If I have clean licensing on everything, can
I then ask for addition to the tree?
Of course you can ask, and if the port is both well done and well
tested, then someone else might have enough interest to take
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Sean Kamath kam...@geekoids.com wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Ted Roby wrote:
I got more help from the first poster who suggested using
Circle Mud instead. The problem is, I was quite attached to
to this modified Rom code, and perhaps committed the
this original
implementation, and I'm looking for others interested in re-implementing
under less restrictive licensing.
So let's drill through things.
1) Did you actually attempt to track down who might be using
a umplawny email address at university of manitoba during the
time frame?
2) Did you
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org wrote:
As for the personal attacks, you can print off this email,
fold it until it's all corners, and shove it up your ass.
Now that was far longer than your first one-liner smackdown.
Good job.
mind being that
lightning rod at all. Thank you for valid information which
may resurrect my hopes.
So how does that work with OpenBSD? How to I introduce
code with shady licensing, and take all the brunt of it?
that's what I'm interested in! I don't mind being that
lightning rod at all. Thank you for valid information which
may resurrect my hopes.
So how does that work with OpenBSD? How to I introduce
code with shady licensing, and take all the brunt of it?
find all(!) copyright holders and have them
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
So how does that work with OpenBSD? How to I introduce
code with shady licensing, and take all the brunt of it?
I don't suppose you've stopped to ask if the OpenBSD project is at all
interested in whatever code you feel like
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
So how does that work with OpenBSD? How to I introduce
code with shady licensing, and take all the brunt of it?
I don't suppose you've stopped
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:41:35 -0600
Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't think OpenBSD was even interested in such licensing
schemes in the Ports tree.
There's non-free software in the ports tree.
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:41:35 -0600
Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't think OpenBSD was even interested in such licensing
schemes in the Ports tree.
There's non-free software in the ports tree.
Not in a real sense. The ports tree is a build infrastructure
containing
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info wrote:
There's non-free software in the ports tree.
Good thing it's in ports, then. Keeps that shady license where we can
see it, and choose to suffer with it or not.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
find all(!) copyright holders and have them agree to a new license. or
don't use that code.
There are at least three projects involved here.
1. The Diku project
2. The Merc project
3. The Forsaken Lands project
Hi list.
I've spent some time porting one of my favorite dungeon
games (a Rom 2.6 derivative). I've only begun this project,
but have already converted 1700+ lines as such:
strcat - strlcat
strcpy - strlcpy
sprintf - snprintf
Much to my disappointment, I may have to rewrite large portions
before
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Time for me to write OpenMUD?
I've had fond memories of CircleMud, and I believe the maintainer is
still around.
--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's men seem to
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
/* umpla...@cc.umanitoba.ca */
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=plawny+umanitoba
I think you'll find a good idea of who to write care of which company.
--
Chris Dukes
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
/* umpla...@cc.umanitoba.ca
*/
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=plawny+umanitoba
I think you'll find a good idea of who to write care of which company.
--
Chris Dukes
On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Chris Dukes
pak...@pr.neotoma.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
/* umpla...@cc.umanitoba.ca
*/
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=plawny+umanitoba
I think you'll find a
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Sean Kamath kam...@geekoids.com wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
/*
On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Sean Kamath kam...@geekoids.com
wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org
wrote:
On Wed, Apr
reply to the entire list, even though you copied me
personally...
I don't care about finding the original sicauther/sic.
He left behind licensing which forbids its application in Open Source.
Please tell me what I should do with his permission?
At best, he can let me host my own mud with his
On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Please tell me what I should do with his permission?
At best, he can let me host my own mud with his code.
At worst, he must rewrite his entire license in all the associated
files.
Now *that* is an interesting question. As the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Sean Kamath kam...@geekoids.com wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Chris Dukes pak...@pr.neotoma.org
wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Sean Kamath kam...@geekoids.com wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Please tell me what I should do with his permission?
At best, he can let me host my own mud with his code.
At worst, he must rewrite his entire license in
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Chris amaneating...@gmail.com wrote:
You're kidding us, right? You can't bother to google something so
basic, you complain when someone points you in the right direction,
make a quick detour for a spelling flame, then act like it'd be way
more work to email
On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
You blew off on this message board assuming I hadn't even
googled, or found our friend Voytek Plawny.
So? Inquiring minds want to know! *Is* he the guy at EA? And more
importantly, is he still a dick?
Sean
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Sean Kamath kam...@geekoids.com wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
You blew off on this message board assuming I hadn't even
googled, or found our friend Voytek Plawny.
So? Inquiring minds want to know! *Is* he the guy
On 15/04/2010, at 8:16 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
I had googled all of this before my first post.
In fact, I have been in contact with the current
maintainers of the project. They have explicit
permission, but that doesn't give me explicit
permission.
Ok, now I'm confused.
You've been ranting for a
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Paul M l...@no-tek.com wrote:
Please clarify what you want from this list.
Peace, Love and Understanding.
Yeah right..
I got more help from the first poster who suggested using
Circle Mud instead. The problem is, I was quite attached to
to this modified Rom
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Bryan bra...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought nothing was zero, and NUL was the absence of nothing...
Wouldn't NULL be the absence of everything, including numerical 0?
Dropping the semantics I'd have to say this thread is NULL, and yet
it is full of... well,
On Apr 14, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Ted Roby wrote:
I got more help from the first poster who suggested using
Circle Mud instead. The problem is, I was quite attached to
to this modified Rom code, and perhaps committed the
error of getting my hopes up.
You just weren't sicto to/sic clear in your
Benjamin Adams wrote on Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 02:21:31PM -0400:
I'm looking for some clarification on Licensing.
I'm looking to build a product using:
OpenBSD
MySQL
Note that the MySQL client libraries are licenced under the GPL, not
under the LGPL, with an explicit exception from the GPL
I'm looking for some clarification on Licensing. I'm looking to build
a product using:
OpenBSD
Tomcat
MySQL
Java
I know OpenBSD is do what you want. Anyone know what sun says for licensing?
I'm looking to sell this product for profit which will help me give
back to OpenBSD :)
Anyone know what
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Benjamin Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for some clarification on Licensing. I'm looking to build
a product using:
OpenBSD
Tomcat
MySQL
Java
I know OpenBSD is do what you want. Anyone know what sun says for licensing?
I'm looking to sell
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:50:04AM -0400, Ernesto Bascon wrote:
Hi everybody:
I do not want to start a flamewar about licensing and hope some
concrete answers to my questions (maybe I seem aggressive, I am not at
all :) ).
I want to develop an OpenBSD specific set of libraries
Your message addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been received.
If you are an MSDN Administrator and would like assistance using our online,
self-help resources, please visit
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/administration/.
If your message is of an urgent nature please feel free to
Dear Mr. Awad:
As a recent purchaser of a brand-new Intel 965 motherboard with Core
2 Duo chip I am very
pleased with the product, but disappointed with news from my favorite
Open Source community,
the OpenBSD community (http://www.openbsd.org) that Intel's licensing
schemes fall short
copyrights which are more
restrictive than the Berkeley copyright, or must relegate this material to a
secondary status, i.e. OpenBSD as a whole is freely redistributable, but some
optional components may not be.
A number of applications have been culled from OpenBSD because of licensing
issues
marrandy wrote on Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:56:44AM -0400:
[...]
The key component is that source should be open.
If you can't provide source then API's have to be open
In similar arguments, it might even be better to argue just the
other way round: Please provide hardware and firmware
No, this isn't another Sendmail needs to be replaced because there was
a security hole email. I was following the thread on BugTraq regarding
the Sendmail vulnerability, and saw this from Theo (Mar 24 2006):
Luckily within a few months you will be able to tell Sendmail how
to disclose their bugs
Luckily within a few months you will be able to tell Sendmail how
to disclose their bugs because their next version is going to come
out with a much more commercial licence. Then you can pay for it,
and then you can complain too.
Is this a hint that there might be a license issues that
60 matches
Mail list logo
