> You asked for others to do things you want. But we don't want the feature
> you want, because we consider it an anti-feature.
>
> We do not want to expose the kernel address space contents like you
> want, because it contains secrets information which is used for a wide
> variety of attach
>>
>> Thanks for your reply, but my emails didn't received the replies I
>> expected to have.
>> And to be honest I don't want to plunge into arid controversy.
>>
>
> This is not hate, BUT you are acting like a baby.
>
> 'Whaa wha you didn't do what I wanted'
Well, that's certainly an
whistlez wrote:
> My mindset was to contribute what I know to improve the
> project.
What did you contribute?
You typed words, which is not a contribution.
You asked for others to do things you want. But we don't want the feature
you want, because we consider it an anti-feature.
We do not
>
> You are spending a lot of time telling very skilled people that
> you are both ignorant on this topic AND how to do their jobs.
>
I understand what you're saying, even though I'm not entirely sure
things are as you describe. However, it already seems important to me
that I managed to
Nick Holland writes:
> Linux has become Windows Reinvented Badly. You seem to think
> OpenBSD should become Linux Reinvented Badly. That's offensive.
We prefer Unix Reimplemented...
Matthew
(Just kidding; it's great)
On 2023年08月20日 01:27, lain. wrote:
> And to respond to whistlez/diana:
My apologies for that, I said "whistlez/diana" by error.
What I meant is just "whistlez".
On 2023年08月19日 09:36, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> This is not hate, BUT you are acting like a baby.
>
> 'Whaa wha you didn't do what I wanted'
This is what I love about OpenBSD, it's one of the last few OS's that
is still capable of resisting the pressure by the status quo, whereas
everybody else
On 8/19/23 06:05, whistlez wrote:
...
I honestly don't understand this hatred.
...
Dude, for a self-proclaimed sensitive person, you are really
very offensive, and begging to have your tender little ass
handed (verbally) to you on a platter.
You are spending a lot of time telling very skilled
whistlez wrote:
>
>
> > I saw no hatred in the post you replied to.
> >
> > OpenBSD developers are Makers, not Takers. They code for OpenBSD for
> > themselves, not for the user community.
> >
> > The point is you should spend some time trying to contribute before you
> > start asking
>
> I don't see any hatred here. I think they understood the question just fine.
> I think perhaps you might be asking in the wrong place for
> voulenteers to write software for Volatility -- this is an OpenBSD list.
Yes, probably I missed that point. I'm sorry I didnt' understand for
that
> I saw no hatred in the post you replied to.
>
> OpenBSD developers are Makers, not Takers. They code for OpenBSD for
> themselves, not for the user community.
>
> The point is you should spend some time trying to contribute before you start
> asking for some "feature".
>
> I've been
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 10:05:41AM +, whistlez said:
I honestly don't understand this hatred. I call it that because I refuse
to accept that you didn't understand the question. Volatility has no
plugin to interpret a ram dump on openbsd and so having only the dump is
totally useless. If you
I saw no hatred in the post you replied to.
OpenBSD developers are Makers, not Takers. They code for OpenBSD for
themselves, not for the user community.
The point is you should spend some time trying to contribute before you start
asking for some "feature".
I've been a user for 25 years
Hey,
Am 19.08.2023 um 12:05 schrieb whistlez:
I honestly don't understand this hatred. I call it that because I refuse
to accept that you didn't understand the question. Volatility has no
plugin to interpret a ram dump on openbsd and so having only the dump is
totally useless. If you really
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 12:05:41PM +0200, whistlez wrote:
> I honestly don't understand this hatred. I call it that because I refuse
> to accept that you didn't understand the question. Volatility has no
> plugin to interpret a ram dump on openbsd and so having only the dump is
> totally
Il 2023-08-18 19:42 Mike Larkin ha scritto:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 01:31:41PM +, whistlez wrote:
>> Il 2023-08-18 09:22 Omar Polo ha scritto:
>> > On 2023/08/18 02:06:11 +, whistlez wrote:
>> >> Il 2023-08-18 02:20 Scott Cheloha ha scritto:
>>
>> 1. Volatility allows the detection of
> >> Furthermore, in my opinion - brace yourself, I might trigger an atomic
> >> war with what I'm about to say -
Don't worry. OpenBSDs ministry of defence considered dropping atomic bombs
over Australia in the past. It's considered an acceptable way of CVS
conflict resolution.
> 1. Volatility
On 2023-08-18, whistlez wrote:
>
> 2. There are multiple methods for RAM dumping, some of which cannot be
> circumvented and do not require specific software or interfaces. For
> example:
> a. Through a 'cold boot attack,' it's possible to dump RAM from an
> uncompromised operating system.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 01:31:41PM +, whistlez wrote:
> Il 2023-08-18 09:22 Omar Polo ha scritto:
> > On 2023/08/18 02:06:11 +, whistlez wrote:
> >> Il 2023-08-18 02:20 Scott Cheloha ha scritto:
> >> >> On Aug 17, 2023, at 10:28, whistlez wrote:
> >>
> >> Furthermore, in my opinion -
Il 2023-08-18 09:22 Omar Polo ha scritto:
> On 2023/08/18 02:06:11 +, whistlez wrote:
>> Il 2023-08-18 02:20 Scott Cheloha ha scritto:
>> >> On Aug 17, 2023, at 10:28, whistlez wrote:
>>
>> Furthermore, in my opinion - brace yourself, I might trigger an atomic
>> war with what I'm about to
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 2:22 AM Scott Cheloha wrote:
>
> > On Aug 17, 2023, at 10:28, whistlez wrote:
> >
> > [...] I believe we need to realize that, while the kernel is very
> > secure, zero-day vulnerabilities are always a lurking threat.
> >
> > For those that don't know what is volatility,
On 2023/08/18 02:06:11 +, whistlez wrote:
> Il 2023-08-18 02:20 Scott Cheloha ha scritto:
> >> On Aug 17, 2023, at 10:28, whistlez wrote:
> >>
>
> >> https://github.com/volatilityfoundation/volatility3
> >
> > What is the utility of this software? How
> > would supporting it benefit the
Il 2023-08-18 02:20 Scott Cheloha ha scritto:
>> On Aug 17, 2023, at 10:28, whistlez wrote:
>>
>> https://github.com/volatilityfoundation/volatility3
>
> What is the utility of this software? How
> would supporting it benefit the project?
>
> I read the summary on Github. I am still
> more
> On Aug 17, 2023, at 10:28, whistlez wrote:
>
> [...] I believe we need to realize that, while the kernel is very
> secure, zero-day vulnerabilities are always a lurking threat.
>
> For those that don't know what is volatility, this is github page
>
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 05:12:54PM +0200, whistlez wrote:
> Hello community, I would like to ask if it's possible to develop a tool
> similar to Volatility in the future or a specific integration for
> OpenBSD. Along with a tool that can perform RAM dumping.
do you need anything else than
Hello community, I would like to ask if it's possible to develop a tool
similar to Volatility in the future or a specific integration for
OpenBSD. Along with a tool that can perform RAM dumping. However, could
this potentially make the kernel vulnerable?
In my opinion, even though I'm not a
26 matches
Mail list logo
