Disable greylisting on rspamd

2019-10-10 Thread Matt Schwartz
Just a quick FYI on disabling rspamd's greylisting module. This is something you will want to go if you run OpenBSD's spamd because it is still the king of first line of defense against spam. # /etc/rspamd/local.d/greylist.conf enabled = false; Then restart rspamd.

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-14 Thread Silvio Siefke
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:22:21 -0500 Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > What is in your blacklist. A table may be what you're > looking for. Domains with @ character before. @123.com @yahoo.de @yahoo.com @whatever.com So ca. 145 lines. Nice day & Thank you Silvio

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-14 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
What is in your blacklist. A table may be what you're looking for. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 14, 2016, at 6:56 AM, Silvio Siefke wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:32:51 +0200 > Gilles Chehade wrote: > >> shouldn't this be: >> >>reject from any

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-14 Thread Silvio Siefke
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:19:41 -0500 Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > reject from any recipient > accept from any recipient for domain relay via > "smtp://127.0.0.1:10024" A short question, must it be or !? I try with yahoo address and smtpd accept message.

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-14 Thread Silvio Siefke
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:19:41 -0500 Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > ... > cat > /etc/smtpd/tables/myusers.conf << "EOF" > u...@domain.tld > us...@domain.tld > EOF Thank you. Silvio -- Silvio Siefke pgpmetNDUS9zK.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-13 Thread Silvio Siefke
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:33:53 -0500 Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > I think the rule above marked with '*' is to blame. You are accepting > everything for your domain and sending it to amavis. Look at adding > a recipients table from smtpd.conf(5). Yes now I understand more.

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-13 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 13, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Silvio Siefke wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:07:29 -0500 > Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > >> For anyone to answer that you would need to provide your smtpd.conf >> possibly logs, etc... > > > #

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-13 Thread Silvio Siefke
On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:07:29 -0500 Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > For anyone to answer that you would need to provide your smtpd.conf > possibly logs, etc... # generate db using makemap table aliases file:/etc/smtpd/tables/aliases table vdoms

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-12 Thread Joerg Jung
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 08:49:04PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote: > On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:06:54 +0200 > Mischa Peters wrote: > > > Have a look at spamd. > > https://www.openbsd.org/spamd/index.html > > > > Also runs on non-OpenBSD. > > Yes spamassassin is running with

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-12 Thread Silvio Siefke
hielding all my > users from the recent 'voicemail' scam using only its default > greylisting (see > http://bsdly.blogspot.com/2016/08/the-voicemail-scammers-never-got-past.html > about that particular incident, links to other articles about spamd(8) > greylisting and related topics therein).

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-12 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
y using spamassassin, that's fine. If you put the OpenBSD spamd in default greylisting mode in front of spamassassin or other content filtering, the load on your content filtering will almost certainly go down significantly. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://b

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-12 Thread Silvio Siefke
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:06:54 +0200 Mischa Peters wrote: > Have a look at spamd. > https://www.openbsd.org/spamd/index.html > > Also runs on non-OpenBSD. Yes spamassassin is running with amavisd-new. That works well, the spam goes in quarantine. Why does OpenSMTPD accept

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-11 Thread Mischa Peters
ogle but I found nothing with greylisting and most about >> spam is with shell scripts and pf. > > If all you've found is 'shell scripts and pf' I don't think you've > looked very closely. > > As Mischa mentioned earlier, on OpenBSD and other OSes with PF there's > spamd(8), wh

Re: Greylisting

2016-09-10 Thread Mischa Peters
Hi Silvio, Have a look at spamd. https://www.openbsd.org/spamd/index.html Also runs on non-OpenBSD. Mischa > On 10 Sep 2016, at 19:10, Silvio Siefke <siefke_lis...@web.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > is greylisting available in opensmtpd? I have so much spam

Greylisting

2016-09-10 Thread Silvio Siefke
Hello, is greylisting available in opensmtpd? I have so much spam and I use blacklist but it will not really work. triolan.net.ua tpasites.com sak-ura.net zwaan.nl ibece.net mccurdycandler.com fischbach.co.uk hv.be outlook.com fischbach.co.uk ecolelasource.ch bvniel...@ymail.com Can i write

Re: using SPF or DKIM instead of greylisting?

2014-05-30 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:26:18AM +0200, Ji Navr??til wrote: Hello, I???m using pf greylisting on OpenBSD. More and more emails from Google are delayed and few are not delivered at all. This https://support.google.com/mail/answer/180063 Google article suggest to replace greylisting

Re: using SPF or DKIM instead of greylisting?

2014-05-30 Thread Jiří Navrátil
V 30. května 2014 at 11:38:43, Gilles Chehade (gil...@poolp.org) napsáno: What is your anti SPAM strategy please? Are available SPF and DKIM configurations examples for OpenSMTPD?    Thak you for your recommendations.    I only use greylisting and fopr big hosts like gmail and yahoo, I have

Re: using SPF or DKIM instead of greylisting?

2014-05-30 Thread Sunil Nimmagadda
=A0 =C2=A0 Thak you for your recommendations.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =20 I only use greylisting and fopr big hosts like gmail and yahoo, I have a script that queries their SPF records to whitelist the MX servers that they advertise.=C2=A0 =20 =20 Thank you for quick reply. =20 That looks

Re: using SPF or DKIM instead of greylisting?

2014-05-30 Thread John D. Verne
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:35:45AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:26:18AM +0200, Ji Navr??til wrote: Hello, I???m using pf greylisting on OpenBSD. More and more emails from Google are delayed and few are not delivered at all. This https