Just a quick FYI on disabling rspamd's greylisting module. This is
something you will want to go if you run OpenBSD's spamd because it is
still the king of first line of defense against spam.
# /etc/rspamd/local.d/greylist.conf
enabled = false;
Then restart rspamd.
You could use a matching rule to these particular emails and use relay via to
specify the host to send it to. However I would think that their system will
still hop you around. Worth a shot though. You could ask their postmaster to
whitelist you on all of their hosts. Probably the better cho
Hi folks,
Looking at my opensmtpd log file (see attachment) some EMails
are greylisted by the peer several times. Apparently the
receiving ISP has several MX hosts, probably each running its
own local whitelist. :-(
Do you think it would be possible in opensmtpd to avoid
hopping from one IP a
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:22:21AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> What is in your blacklist. A table may be what you're looking for.
>
DUH.
thanks for correcting me, I was out of my mind.
rephrasing:
shouldn't this be:
reject from any sender for any
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.pool
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:22:21 -0500
Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> What is in your blacklist. A table may be what you're
> looking for.
Domains with @ character before.
@123.com
@yahoo.de
@yahoo.com
@whatever.com
So ca. 145 lines.
Nice day & Thank you
Silvio
pgp_o6uKEQcBU.pgp
Description: PGP si
What is in your blacklist. A table may be what you're looking for.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 6:56 AM, Silvio Siefke wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:32:51 +0200
> Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
>> shouldn't this be:
>>
>>reject from any recipient for any
>
> I try with same
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:32:51 +0200
Gilles Chehade wrote:
> shouldn't this be:
>
> reject from any recipient for any
I try with same result. Blacklist goes on.
Thank you & Nice day
Silvio
Sep 14 13:53:45 vps296466.ovh.net smtpd[24878]: c0898de601e6da38 smtp
event=connected address=98.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:29:42AM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:19:41 -0500
> Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>
>
> > reject from any recipient
> > accept from any recipient for domain relay via
> > "smtp://127.0.0.1:10024"
>
shouldn't this be:
reject from any recipient
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:19:41 -0500
Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> reject from any recipient
> accept from any recipient for domain relay via
> "smtp://127.0.0.1:10024"
A short question, must it be or !? I try with
yahoo address and smtpd accept message.
[root@vps296466 smtpd]# cat tables/black
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:19:41 -0500
Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> ...
> cat > /etc/smtpd/tables/myusers.conf << "EOF"
> u...@domain.tld
> us...@domain.tld
> EOF
Thank you.
Silvio
--
Silvio Siefke
pgpmetNDUS9zK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 16-09-13 12:33:53, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 13, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:07:29 -0500
> > Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> >
> >> For anyone to answer that you would need to provide your smtpd.conf
> >> possibly log
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:33:53 -0500
Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> I think the rule above marked with '*' is to blame. You are accepting
> everything for your domain and sending it to amavis. Look at adding
> a recipients table from smtpd.conf(5).
Yes now I understand more. It come in and check only d
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Silvio Siefke wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:07:29 -0500
> Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>
>> For anyone to answer that you would need to provide your smtpd.conf
>> possibly logs, etc...
>
>
> # generate db using makemap
> table aliases file:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:07:29 -0500
Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> For anyone to answer that you would need to provide your smtpd.conf
> possibly logs, etc...
# generate db using makemap
table aliases file:/etc/smtpd/tables/aliases
table vdoms file:/etc/smtpd/tables/domains.conf
table vusers file:/etc
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 08:49:04PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:06:54 +0200
> Mischa Peters wrote:
>
> > Have a look at spamd.
> > https://www.openbsd.org/spamd/index.html
> >
> > Also runs on non-OpenBSD.
>
> Yes spamassassin is running with amavisd-new. That works wel
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Silvio Siefke wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:06:54 +0200
> Mischa Peters wrote:
>
>> Have a look at spamd.
>> https://www.openbsd.org/spamd/index.html
>>
>> Also runs on non-OpenBSD.
>
> Yes spamassassin is running with amavisd-new. Tha
shielding all my
> users from the recent 'voicemail' scam using only its default
> greylisting (see
> http://bsdly.blogspot.com/2016/08/the-voicemail-scammers-never-got-past.html
> about that particular incident, links to other articles about spamd(8)
> greylisting and relat
sin, that's fine. If you put the
OpenBSD spamd in default greylisting mode in front of spamassassin or
other content filtering, the load on your content filtering will almost
certainly go down significantly.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:06:54 +0200
Mischa Peters wrote:
> Have a look at spamd.
> https://www.openbsd.org/spamd/index.html
>
> Also runs on non-OpenBSD.
Yes spamassassin is running with amavisd-new. That works well, the spam
goes in quarantine. Why does OpenSMTPD accept mails to addresses whic
Hi Peter,
That is indeed a great article. Thank you for writing it. It gave me a new
appreciation for spamd again. :)
Mischa
> On 11 Sep 2016, at 12:17, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>
>> On 09/10/16 19:10, Silvio Siefke wrote:
>> I search with google but I found nothing wi
On 09/10/16 19:10, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> I search with google but I found nothing with greylisting and most about
> spam is with shell scripts and pf.
If all you've found is 'shell scripts and pf' I don't think you've
looked very closely.
As Mischa mentioned ear
Hi Silvio,
Have a look at spamd.
https://www.openbsd.org/spamd/index.html
Also runs on non-OpenBSD.
Mischa
> On 10 Sep 2016, at 19:10, Silvio Siefke wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> is greylisting available in opensmtpd? I have so much spam and I use
> blacklist but it wi
Hello,
is greylisting available in opensmtpd? I have so much spam and I use
blacklist but it will not really work.
triolan.net.ua
tpasites.com
sak-ura.net
zwaan.nl
ibece.net
mccurdycandler.com
fischbach.co.uk
hv.be
outlook.com
fischbach.co.uk
ecolelasource.ch
bvniel...@ymail.com
Can i write
On 2014-05-30 Fri 11:26 AM |, Ji Navr??til wrote:
>
> I'm using pf greylisting on OpenBSD. More and more emails from Google are
> delayed and few are not delivered at all.
>
Setting greyexp to 48+ hours works fine. You could set it to 4 days.
Create one of those shitmail
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:35:45AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:26:18AM +0200, Ji Navr??til wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I???m using pf greylisting on OpenBSD. More and more emails from Google are
> > delayed and few are not delivered
> configurations examples for OpenSMTPD?=C2=A0
> > >=C2=A0
> > > Thak you for your recommendations.=C2=A0
> > >=C2=A0
> >=20
> > I only use greylisting and fopr big hosts like gmail and yahoo, I
> > have a script that queries their SPF records to whitel
k you for your recommendations.
> >
>
> I only use greylisting and fopr big hosts like gmail and yahoo, I
> have a script that queries their SPF records to whitelist the MX
> servers that they advertise.
>
>
> Thank you for quick reply.
>
> That looks as reason
V 30. května 2014 at 11:38:43, Gilles Chehade (gil...@poolp.org) napsáno:
> What is your anti SPAM strategy please? Are available SPF and DKIM
> configurations examples for OpenSMTPD?
>
> Thak you for your recommendations.
>
I only use greylisting and fopr big hosts like gma
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:26:18AM +0200, Ji Navr??til wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I???m using pf greylisting on OpenBSD. More and more emails from Google are
> delayed and few are not delivered at all.
>
> This https://support.google.com/mail/answer/180063 Google article sug
Hello,
I’m using pf greylisting on OpenBSD. More and more emails from Google are
delayed and few are not delivered at all.
This https://support.google.com/mail/answer/180063 Google article suggest to
replace greylisting with SPF or DKIM.
What is your anti SPAM strategy please? Are available
30 matches
Mail list logo
