Re: new snapshot, beware syntax change

2013-09-24 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:41:15PM -0400, Rob Sciuk wrote: > > Your point about snapshots is well taken. The problem then becomes > syntax changes between stable releases, but I'm not complaining. > I've seen nothing but improvments being made to OpenSMTPD, and with > the man page updates, I'm ba

Re: new snapshot, beware syntax change

2013-09-24 Thread Rob Sciuk
n, a remarkable project. Thanks! Cheers, Rob. On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Gilles Chehade wrote: Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:35:33 +0200 From: Gilles Chehade To: Rob Sciuk Cc: misc@opensmtpd.org Subject: Re: new snapshot, beware syntax change On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:40:25AM -0400, Rob Sciuk wrote:

Re: new snapshot, beware syntax change

2013-09-24 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:40:25AM -0400, Rob Sciuk wrote: > On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > [...] > > > >The documentation has not yet been updated, I'm working at it right now > >as it's quite an invasive change to the man page. All of this will be > >documented before next releas

new snapshot, beware syntax change

2013-09-24 Thread Gilles Chehade
Hi, The new snapshot has had some very invasive changes, and we want to make sure we didn't break something while at it. 1- update your smtpd.conf = If you have rules that specify a source other than "any" or "local", you will need to update your smtpd.conf: accept fr