On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:41:15PM -0400, Rob Sciuk wrote:
>
> Your point about snapshots is well taken. The problem then becomes
> syntax changes between stable releases, but I'm not complaining.
> I've seen nothing but improvments being made to OpenSMTPD, and with
> the man page updates, I'm ba
n, a remarkable project. Thanks!
Cheers,
Rob.
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:35:33 +0200
From: Gilles Chehade
To: Rob Sciuk
Cc: misc@opensmtpd.org
Subject: Re: new snapshot, beware syntax change
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:40:25AM -0400, Rob Sciuk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:40:25AM -0400, Rob Sciuk wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> >The documentation has not yet been updated, I'm working at it right now
> >as it's quite an invasive change to the man page. All of this will be
> >documented before next releas
Hi,
The new snapshot has had some very invasive changes, and we want to make
sure we didn't break something while at it.
1- update your smtpd.conf
=
If you have rules that specify a source other than "any" or "local", you
will need to update your smtpd.conf:
accept fr