Re: pkg_create error

2005-09-22 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:08:39AM +, Edy Purnomo wrote: argh! yes, it's true, i did update the ports by typing cvsup -g -L 2 cvs-supfile with conf: # Defaults that apply to all the collections *default host=cvsup.uk.openbsd.org *default base=/var

Re: pkg_create error

2005-09-22 Thread Edy Purnomo
i'm not sure that i can do that smoothly. the server is our firewall and it's running : - mrtg - squid - openntp anyone has a reference site about upgrading 3.4 - current ? i don't confidence after i messed up with FBSD 4.11 tia From: Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pkg_create error

2005-09-22 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:41:04 + Edy Purnomo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'm not sure that i can do that smoothly. the server is our firewall and it's running : - mrtg - squid - openntp anyone has a reference site about upgrading 3.4 - current ? i don't confidence after i messed up with

Re: pkg_create error

2005-09-22 Thread Rogier Krieger
On 9/22/05, Edy Purnomo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'm not sure that i can do that smoothly. the server is our firewall and it's running : Use a quiet window on your network to down the machine. Add a new boot drive to the system and install the latest release or -current snapshot. Transfer items

Re: Live dc

2005-09-22 Thread Vjacheslav Borisov
Andreas Bihlmaier wrote: I made bootable cdrom you described. Does it work otherwise ? Yes, it works! This is just what I want - diskless router on CD. With pf rules loaded from floppy disk.

3.7: INVALID PAYLOAD TYPE

2005-09-22 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, I have three machines: one 3.7, one 3.6, and one Windows 2000 laptop. The client software on the laptop is this: ftp://ftp.funkwerk-ec.com/pub/ipsec_client/bintec_secure_client_v11.zip aka NCP Secure Entry which usually runs very nicely. The two OpenBSD machines are configured

Re: 3.7: INVALID PAYLOAD TYPE

2005-09-22 Thread Hans-Joerg Hoexer
This is fixed in 3.7-stable and above. HJ. On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:37:16PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: Hello, I have three machines: one 3.7, one 3.6, and one Windows 2000 laptop. The client software on the laptop is this:

jot(1) issue

2005-09-22 Thread frantisek holop
hi there, i have found the following interesting case. is this the intended behaviour? kripel jot -s -b - 72

Re: jot(1) issue

2005-09-22 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, frantisek holop wrote: hi there, i have found the following interesting case. is this the intended behaviour? kripel jot -s -b - 72

Max number of states in pf? (100k? 200k? 1M?)

2005-09-22 Thread nate
Greetings I don't have a good way to test generating large numbers of states so I was wondering for a server with 2GB of memory which all it does is pf how many states can it handle? I started with the default of 10k, exausted that pretty quick, then upped it to 32k about 3 weeks ago then

Re: Storage Server

2005-09-22 Thread Marco Peereboom
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:05:31PM -0600, Tom Geman wrote: I was hoping someone here could answer a few questions. Can I install OpenBSD on this PV 220, or is it just a bunch of disks with no processor? This question is very ambiguous. You can't install OpenBSD on the PV220S itself however

Re: CARP/PFSYNC over USB is possible?

2005-09-22 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna wrote: I'm currently using an OpenBSD 3.7 as a firewall for my network, since this machines is a 1U rack I can't add an extra ethernet card to it, so I was looking for an alternative solution to use redundancy, since there are plenty of usb ports

Dell 2650, Stupid Adaptec Controller, and Daily Crashes

2005-09-22 Thread eric
I have a Dell 2650 with an Adaptec controller. This machine is constantly crashing due to either a high load or some sort of a kernel panic. I submitted the following bug report a while ago... http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yesnumbers=4494 I know that Adaptec support was

Re: Portmap non-local set / unset attempt

2005-09-22 Thread Theo de Raadt
I'm receiving the following messages from portmap when starting Legato Networker's nsrexecd. The nsrexecd I'm running is the Linux version under emulation: portmap[16083]: non-local unset attempt (might be from 127.0.0.1) portmap[16083]: non-local set attempt (might be from 127.0.0.1)

Re: Portmap non-local set / unset attempt

2005-09-22 Thread Michael Favinsky
That's what I thought. I have no idea why Legato continues to use portmapper at all. They've been telling me they're going to stop using it since at least 1999. I actually came up with a workaround that I think might expose a potential issue in rpcinfo. Since I couldn't get nsrexecd to

Userland Compilation Dies

2005-09-22 Thread Chris
Hello. I had an OBSD system, 3.6. I went to update it the other day to 3.7, and everything seemed to work swell. I followed the instructions from the upgrade faq, and things seemed to work without a hitch. I am trying to follow the stable branch, so updated my CVS for src, ports and X like so:

Re: Dell 2650, Stupid Adaptec Controller, and Daily Crashes

2005-09-22 Thread Marco Peereboom
What do the crashes look like? Fell free to contact Adaptec and let them know that you are having issues with their raid card. On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 01:10:30PM -0500, eric wrote: I have a Dell 2650 with an Adaptec controller. This machine is constantly crashing due to either a high load or

Re: Userland Compilation Dies

2005-09-22 Thread Greg Thomas
On 9/22/05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. I had an OBSD system, 3.6. I went to update it the other day to 3.7, and everything seemed to work swell. I followed the instructions from the upgrade faq, and things seemed to work without a hitch. I am trying to follow the stable branch,

Re: Userland Compilation Dies

2005-09-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 22 September 2005 16:52 -0400, Chris wrote: I am trying to follow the stable branch, so updated my CVS for src, ports and X like so: # cd /usr # cvs -d$CVSROOT up -Pd* That's -current. Add -rOPENBSD_3_7 for 3.7-stable, or follow http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html updating beyond

Re: Dell 2650, Stupid Adaptec Controller, and Daily Crashes

2005-09-22 Thread eric
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 16:06:39 -0500, Marco Peereboom proclaimed... What do the crashes look like? Sometimes I can get to DDB, other times it will just crash so bad I can't even get console. I could get this much out of it when I did the PR report. uvm_fault(0xd7e12a20, 0xcffa5000, 0, 1) -

can't recognize my cdrom, here is my dmesg

2005-09-22 Thread Csaba Nemes
Hi all it boots from an unofficial cdrom, but it doesn't find my cdrom here is my dmesg: OpenBSD 3.7 (RAMDISK_CD) #573: Sun Mar 20 00:27:05 MST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD cpu0: Intel Celeron (GenuineIntel 686-class, 128KB L2 cache) 301 MHz cpu0:

Re: Dell 2650, Stupid Adaptec Controller, and Daily Crashes

2005-09-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 22 September 2005 13:10 -0500, eric wrote: I have a Dell 2650 with an Adaptec controller. This machine is constantly crashing due to either a high load or some sort of a kernel panic. I know that Adaptec support was dropped in 3.7, and I wish I didn't have this piece of shit to deal with.

Re: Dell 2650, Stupid Adaptec Controller, and Daily Crashes

2005-09-22 Thread Marco Peereboom
Have you tried by any chance tried a 3.8 with aac enabled? This seems to go wrong in em and not aac. On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0500, eric wrote: On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 16:06:39 -0500, Marco Peereboom proclaimed... What do the crashes look like? Sometimes I can get to DDB, other

Re: Userland Compilation Dies

2005-09-22 Thread Nick Holland
Stuart Henderson wrote: --On 22 September 2005 16:52 -0400, Chris wrote: ... Replace i386 in the first line with your machine name. That's 'machine' as in 'what uname -m tells you' (i386, sparc64, macppc, hppa, [...]), not hostname. That was somewhat unclear on my part. Fixed now.

APM configuration question

2005-09-22 Thread Emil Khatib
Hi everybody I've found out that OBSD supports APM; but googling around I haven't found how to enable this feature. Is there any option to enable in the kernel with config or recompiling the kernel? Sorry if it's a dumb question :P (By the way, is APM supported on AMD64?)

Re: Portmap non-local set / unset attempt

2005-09-22 Thread Clint M. Sand
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:02:13PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: snip People keep yammering this bullshit about Security is a process. Bullshit! Lies! It's about paying attention to the frigging details when they are right in front of your face. And it is very clear other vendors do not pay

Re: Portmap non-local set / unset attempt

2005-09-22 Thread Theo de Raadt
People keep yammering this bullshit about Security is a process. Bullshit! Lies! It's about paying attention to the frigging details when they are right in front of your face. And it is very clear other vendors do not pay attention to the details, considering the work I did here was

Re: APM configuration question

2005-09-22 Thread Marco Peereboom
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 02:34:18AM +0200, Emil Khatib wrote: Hi everybody I've found out that OBSD supports APM; but googling around I haven't found how to enable this feature. Is there any option to enable in the kernel with config or recompiling the kernel? Its enabled by default on i386.

Re: Portmap non-local set / unset attempt

2005-09-22 Thread Theo de Raadt
Which is why I now know MORE about air-conditioners than most of the technicians who come here. The phrase, and everything you said, is all excuses for the vendors. I bet that the air-conditoner technicians believe that Air-conditioner maintainance is a process. Which is why they can never

Re: Portmap non-local set / unset attempt

2005-09-22 Thread Clint M. Sand
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:09:12PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: People keep yammering this bullshit about Security is a process. Bullshit! Lies! It's about paying attention to the frigging details when they are right in front of your face. And it is very clear other vendors do not

Re: Max number of states in pf? (100k? 200k? 1M?)

2005-09-22 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, nate wrote: Can I run with 200k states? 500k ? 1M states? 'top' reads 1833MB of memory is available. The docs say that 32MB is enough for ~30k states. so in theory memory wise at least this box should be able to handle at least 1.6M states. Not that I plan to keep that

RE: Re: Portmap non-local set / unset attempt

2005-09-22 Thread tony
Security is everything you've ever said, plus a process. No. security does not require the process. Attempted security (that doesn't quite work) requires a process. Like the difference between does work and should work.

Re: Max number of states in pf? (100k? 200k? 1M?)

2005-09-22 Thread Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna
Well, I'm running a similar setup, only Xeon 2.4 dual and running with 300k states, the info so far is: State Table Total Rate current entries89976 searches 2049646948754332.6/s inserts

Re: Max number of states in pf? (100k? 200k? 1M?)

2005-09-22 Thread Paul Connally
On 9/22/05, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings I don't have a good way to test generating large numbers of states so I was wondering for a server with 2GB of memory which all it does is pf how many states can it handle? I started with the default of 10k, exausted that pretty quick,