TechJobsCafe.com
GIS Focus
GIS and Related Fields
[IMAGE]
Saturday
April 14, 2007
From: TechJobsCafe
Map Faster Safer - LaserTech.com
Bentley Institue
[IMAGE]
On Friday, April 13, 2007 at 17:21:14 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Maurice Janssen wrote:
On Friday, April 13, 2007 at 15:16:41 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
If there was a real concrete effort, not just the usual vapor ware, I
would/could offer hosting in Equinix peering point, for downloading
On Saturday, April 14, 2007 at 07:43:06 +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
My company has to provide -stable base system and especially packages on
at least i386 for it's customers. We have a fan-out box to which
customer systems connect (the PKG_PATH points to it). This works really
nice an we can
On Apr 13, 2007, at 8:49 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
Does your Mail setup use a PostgreSQL backend?
No. I just used plain text files. This was a small test install to
evaluate for my main mail server install. I haven't used any database
back-end at this point.
I am wanting to know
On Apr 13, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
OpenBSD's sendmail, dovecot, and hastymail is a great solution, in my
opinion, for large or small networks. It allows you to support a
variety of clients very easily and with excellent security. Like Bryan
Vyhmeister mentioned, postfix also is a
Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
OpenBSD's sendmail, dovecot, and hastymail is a great solution, in my
opinion, for large or small networks. It allows you to support a
variety of clients very easily and with excellent security. Like Bryan
Vyhmeister
On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:03 AM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
Is there any reasonably easy way to get SMTP AUTH functioning with
sendmail and dovecot?
i asked about this a few weeks back and i think the answer is no. this
means you have to maintain 2 pw DBs, one for dovecot,
I just skimmed this whole thread and I am wondering about a couple of
things. It appears that all of you are talking about basically
following the instructions for release(8) and just providing the
generated files for people. Is that correct?
If the above is true, I can also assist with
Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
Or even more important: how is the song?
Wijnand
Excellent. Arabic style :) About magic caves and words :)
On 4/15/07, Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
OpenBSD's sendmail, dovecot, and hastymail is a great solution, in my
opinion, for large or small networks. It allows you to support a
variety of clients very easily and with excellent
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 02:14:56AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:03 AM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
Is there any reasonably easy way to get SMTP AUTH functioning with
sendmail and dovecot?
i asked about this a few weeks back and i think the
Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
I just skimmed this whole thread and I am wondering about a couple of
things. It appears that all of you are talking about basically following
the instructions for release(8) and just providing the generated files
for people. Is that correct?
That is not enough. You
On 2007/04/15 02:37, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
The original poster seemed to be asking more about an incremental
update system. Maybe that's the wrong term but something along the
lines of the name-your-favorite-linux-distribution setup. An example
might be yum in CentOS (and others) or
On Apr 15, 2007, at 3:05 AM, Marc Balmer wrote:
Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
I just skimmed this whole thread and I am wondering about a couple
of things. It appears that all of you are talking about basically
following the instructions for release(8) and just providing the
generated files
On Apr 15, 2007, at 3:09 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/04/15 02:37, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
The original poster seemed to be asking more about an incremental
update system. Maybe that's the wrong term but something along the
lines of the name-your-favorite-linux-distribution setup. An
Hello all
I am trying a - what I think is - simple ipsec setup. The point is to
ipsec-encrypt all traffic between a pair of firewalls (gateA and gateB,
both OBSD 4.0), in order to send pfsync traffic over the encrypted link.
Although having read through ipsec, ipsec.conf, isakmpd and friend's
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:32:38PM -0400, Frank Bax wrote:
Based on what your vendor says; it looks like the file originally contains
only LF and not CRLF; so enabling ASCII transfer should convert LF to
CRLF. If your transfer software doesn't have this option find another that
does.
Markus Wernig wrote:
Hello all
I am trying a - what I think is - simple ipsec setup. The point is to
ipsec-encrypt all traffic between a pair of firewalls (gateA and gateB,
both OBSD 4.0), in order to send pfsync traffic over the encrypted link.
Although having read through ipsec,
Renaud Allard wrote:
It seems you just forgot to load your rules.
Just add ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf in the rc.local of both your
firewalls and everything should just work fine.
Hi
I've tried to load the rules by hand with ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf
- to no avail. On the other hand I
Markus Wernig wrote:
Renaud Allard wrote:
It seems you just forgot to load your rules.
Just add ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf in the rc.local of both your
firewalls and everything should just work fine.
Hi
I've tried to load the rules by hand with ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf
- to no
On 15/04/07, Markus Wernig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Renaud Allard wrote:
It seems you just forgot to load your rules.
Just add ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf in the rc.local of both your
firewalls and everything should just work fine.
Hi
I've tried to load the rules by hand with ipsecctl -f
Renaud Allard wrote:
Did you verify that isakmpd is running?
Yes. It runs as follows:
11967 ?? Is 0:00.05 isakmpd: monitor [priv] (isakmpd)
18753 ?? I 0:01.40 isakmpd -S -K -f /var/run/isakmpd.fifo
Markus Wernig wrote:
Renaud Allard wrote:
It seems you just forgot to load your rules.
Just add ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf in the rc.local of both your
firewalls and everything should just work fine.
Hi
I've tried to load the rules by hand with ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf
- to no
Renaud Allard wrote:
Maybe also try on both firewalls:
cd /etc/isakmpd ln -s private/local.pub .
Then restart isakmpd and reload the rules.
Hi
Tried that as well ... still no go.
I have disabled pf for setting the enc up. I suppose, that doesn't
matter, does it?
krgds /markus
Markus Wernig wrote:
Renaud Allard wrote:
Did you verify that isakmpd is running?
Yes. It runs as follows:
11967 ?? Is 0:00.05 isakmpd: monitor [priv] (isakmpd)
18753 ?? I 0:01.40 isakmpd -S -K -f /var/run/isakmpd.fifo
-S is used for redundant setups. Did you try
Markus Wernig wrote:
Renaud Allard wrote:
Maybe also try on both firewalls:
cd /etc/isakmpd ln -s private/local.pub .
Then restart isakmpd and reload the rules.
Hi
Tried that as well ... still no go.
I have disabled pf for setting the enc up. I suppose, that doesn't
matter, does
Hi,
I'm in the need to replace my two 100mbit fxp nic's in my firewall with a
1000mbit one. The hardware is kinda old. (PIII)
I'm looking for an inexpensive but not bad (so I think no realtek chips) nic.
Have looked at sk and bge, but couldn't find any bge nics at my local vendors.
So... which
Markus Wernig wrote:
Renaud Allard wrote:
It seems you just forgot to load your rules.
Just add ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf in the rc.local of both your
firewalls and everything should just work fine.
Hi
I've tried to load the rules by hand with ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf
-
Hello!
Renaud Allard wrote:
Markus Wernig wrote:
Renaud Allard wrote:
Did you verify that isakmpd is running?
Yes. It runs as follows:
11967 ?? Is 0:00.05 isakmpd: monitor [priv] (isakmpd)
18753 ?? I 0:01.40 isakmpd -S -K -f /var/run/isakmpd.fifo
-S is used for redundant
I could have posted this on the alpha list but I thought I might get
a better answer here since that list has very little traffic. OpenBSD/
cats is no longer around and is OpenBSD/alpha on its way out as well?
I am not intending to cause any rumors or anything but I do have the
opportunity
Hi everyone,
I have to replace a UPS and I was wondering if anyone could make a
recommendation (Last time I purchased one was 4 years ago, so I've a
bit out of the loop by now).
Here is what I will be working with:
- Fresh install of 4.1 (as soon as my copy gets here)
- I Will probably be
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 05:26:11PM +0200, Markus Wernig wrote:
/etc/rc.conf.local
ipsec=YES
isakmpd_flags=-K -f /var/run/isakmpd.fifo
why the -f ...? isakmpd takes care of the fifo itself. You only need
-K, nothing else.
- Fresh install of 4.1 (as soon as my copy gets here)
- I Will probably be using nut to shutdown the server.
I'm trying to find something that won't require too much
configs/poking around. I'm not looking for something fancy either, I
just need enough juice to shutdown the server properly when
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:40:48AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
I could have posted this on the alpha list but I thought I might get
a better answer here since that list has very little traffic. OpenBSD/
cats is no longer around and is OpenBSD/alpha on its way out as well?
I am not
What are your power requirements? Just a single server? How big of a
system are we talking about? ...mainframe, onyx, or a single opteron?
Regards,
~Jason
My power requirements are very small. The server is running an Athlon
xp 2000+ with 2 HDDs in raid 1 (no screen). And that's the only
I am trying to send mail from rc.local to inform users about reboots. I
wrote a script /root/reboot_notification containing the following:
#!/bin/sh
for user in `/bin/cat /root/reboot_notification_users`; do
echo $SERVER has rebooted at `/bin/date` | /usr/bin/mail -s $server
reboot $user
Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
OpenBSD's sendmail, dovecot, and hastymail is a great solution, in my
opinion, for large or small networks. It allows you to support a
variety of clients very easily and with excellent security.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:00:38PM +0200, Ivo van der Sangen wrote:
I am trying to send mail from rc.local to inform users about reboots. I
wrote a script /root/reboot_notification containing the following:
#!/bin/sh
for user in `/bin/cat /root/reboot_notification_users`; do
echo
On 2007/04/15 20:27, Chris C. wrote:
I'm in the need to replace my two 100mbit fxp nic's in my firewall with a
1000mbit one. The hardware is kinda old. (PIII)
I'm looking for an inexpensive but not bad (so I think no realtek chips) nic.
Have looked at sk and bge, but couldn't find any bge
On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:53 AM, Martin Hedenfalk wrote:
On 4/15/07, Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reasonably easy way to get SMTP AUTH functioning with
sendmail and dovecot?
I'm using sendmail, dovecot and a PostgreSQL database with passwords.
I got SMTP AUTH working
On Apr 15, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Adam wrote:
Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reasonably easy way to get SMTP AUTH functioning with
sendmail and dovecot?
Yes, just put WANT_SMTPAUTH=yes in your /etc/mk.conf, install the
cyrus-sasl package and recompile sendmail. Then see
On Apr 15, 2007, at 3:03 AM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 02:14:56AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
That was the primary reason for using postfix with dovecot. Years
back, I tried to get both sendmail and postfix working with SMTP AUTH
and Cyrus as I recall. It was a mess.
On Apr 15, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:40:48AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
I could have posted this on the alpha list but I thought I might get
a better answer here since that list has very little traffic.
OpenBSD/
cats is no longer around and is
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 02:06:56PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 3:03 AM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 02:14:56AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
That was the primary reason for using postfix with dovecot. Years
back, I tried to get both sendmail and
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 02:30:02PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:40:48AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
I could have posted this on the alpha list but I thought I might get
a better answer here since that list
Here is my recommendation. You only have to install and maintain
patches on one piece of software other than OpenBSD. The software
is OpenVPN with OpenBSD's sendmail and popa3d.
Why popa3d? User can use any mail client he choses and you don't
have to worry about your email server running out
On 2007/04/15 14:06, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
This is exactly why I have hesitated to move to a system based on
postfix and dovecot for my main ISP mail server.
This pair are pretty easy. Postfix (also more recent Exim versions) can
look at Dovecot for smtp-auth; Dovecot's auth setup is quite
Hi,
On the other hand, there seems to be a 'the alpha bug' around. I don't
think it's solved yet, and it's been around for a long time.
Apparently,
it causes random crashes.
only on some machines.
I was not aware of this bug. That is unfortunate. Hopefully this
might be resolved at some
On Apr 15, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Siegbert Marschall wrote:
Hi,
On the other hand, there seems to be a 'the alpha bug' around. I
don't
think it's solved yet, and it's been around for a long time.
Apparently,
it causes random crashes.
only on some machines.
Any idea if it surfaces on dual
On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 02:30:02PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
That is a good sign. Another reason to keep it around is that alpha
machines were commercially produced which the cats machines were just
evaluation boards. Big difference. I
* Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-16 00:32]:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Siegbert Marschall wrote:
Hi,
On the other hand, there seems to be a 'the alpha bug' around. I
don't
think it's solved yet, and it's been around for a long time.
Apparently,
it causes random crashes.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:32:00PM +0200, Markus Wernig wrote:
Hello!
Renaud Allard wrote:
Markus Wernig wrote:
Renaud Allard wrote:
Did you verify that isakmpd is running?
Yes. It runs as follows:
11967 ?? Is 0:00.05 isakmpd: monitor [priv] (isakmpd)
18753 ?? I
if [ -x /root/reboot_notification ]; then
You probably want to use -f here, not -x. man test.
--
Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
On 14/04/07, Steven Presser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm working for a small company which has settled on OpenBSD as its
server software (because the security is excellent). We have settled on
what software to use for everything but the mail server. I'd like to
request recommendations
Don't lament,
1. There is a potential fix for the alpha bug coming up
2. The cats boards are junk, you didn't want them anyways,
As reported by miod@
Make it clear that it was the hardware which turned out to be unreliable,
not the software (and after having a cats board catch fire here, I dare
James Hartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any other ideas? Thanks.
Some receivers I've tried work at 9600 instead of 4800...
I'm running Postfix/Dovecot with PostgreSQL (for authorization and mail
routing) all from the ports. I've got it setup so that in the near
future I can do virtual hosting of my wife's domains. It's pretty
simple to setup and there is a examples at postfix.org and dovecot.org.
It would be
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:40:01AM +0300, Keith Richardson wrote:
The fact that touch is not working suggests rc.local is not even being=20
called
I tested it again. Touch looks to be working now, although I noticed
that I had to fork mysqld_safe. Apparently the script stopped when I
didn't.
I
I'm sorry to bring this up again, since it didn't get any responses the
first time.
But I haven't had any luck on my own, and was hoping someone might have an
idea.
On 4/9/07, david l goodrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two hosts in a CARP group.
on router-meus-cd1, i have the
On 16/04/07, Shane Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Postfix/Dovecot with PostgreSQL (for authorization and mail
routing) all from the ports. I've got it setup so that in the near
future I can do virtual hosting of my wife's domains. It's pretty
simple to setup and there is a
Paolo Supino wrote:
I appriciate your straight and forward replies :-) but the world isn't
black and white and sometime you have to create work arounds to overcome
other people's crap (well most of the time).
No, in this case it is black and white. There is NO WAY to reliably fix
this
On Apr 15, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
all alphas, but it seems to happen more often on miatas than on cs20s.
my cs20 is pretty stable. the cs20 is probably the nicest alpha we
support.
The CS20 does seem to be a pretty nice machine. I noticed that there
is one obvious CS20 in
62 matches
Mail list logo
