On 20:12:45 Nov 16, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Say you have a 10Mb ethernet feed, plugged into an
unmanaged switch with a bunch of other people in the
building connecting to other ports, who sometimes use
up all available bandwidth on the uplink, and other
times use nothing.
I am not sure if
On 2007/11/16 21:16, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:15:22PM -0500, System Administrator wrote:
On 16 Nov 2007 at 16:36, Pawel Veselov wrote:
(just trying to find a cheap SATA hardware raid card...)
Executive summary: Find another card or use soft-raid.
The
Hello,
It's somewhat bothersome that ktrace doesn't dump the actual values for the
structures that were passed in as the arguments to a syscall. All you see are
addresses, and may be you can see some translated to names, but that's about
it. It would be nice if one can see inside the actual
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 05:57:29PM +1100, Chris wrote:
My system boots to xdm I login to ion. Is there any way I could try
out cwm while I am running ion?
Thanks.
You can't have two window managers running on the same display at the
same time.
See xnest(1) for a nice way to test X
Hi,
Has anyone had luck compiling the pcc that comes in the source tree?
I've been trying everyday after syncronizing, but im having the same error
over and over.
It always fails on the directory ccom/i386 with this error:
cc -O2 -pipe -DPCC_DEBUG -DGCC_COMPAT -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 10:43:22AM -, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone had luck compiling the pcc that comes in the source tree?
I've been trying everyday after syncronizing, but im having the same error
over and over.
It always fails on the directory ccom/i386 with this error:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:34:22 -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 11/16/07, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/07, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
instead of pondering problems with using the whole disk, you could
just use svnd with a file.
Yeah but doesn't this hint at some
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 10:43:22AM -, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone had luck compiling the pcc that comes in the source tree?
I've been trying everyday after syncronizing, but im having the same error
over and over.
It always fails on the directory ccom/i386 with this error:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone had luck compiling the pcc that comes in the source tree?
I've been trying everyday after syncronizing, but im having the same error
over and over.
It always fails on the directory ccom/i386 with this error:
cc -O2 -pipe -DPCC_DEBUG
Hi,
Has anyone had luck compiling the pcc that comes in the source tree?
I've been trying everyday after syncronizing, but im having the same
error over and over.
It always fails on the directory ccom/i386
cc -O2 -pipe -DPCC_DEBUG -DGCC_COMPAT -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wstrict-prototypes
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Pedro Oliveira wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone had luck compiling the pcc that comes in the source tree?
I've been trying everyday after syncronizing, but im having the same
error over and over.
It always fails on the directory ccom/i386
cc -O2 -pipe -DPCC_DEBUG
Tried what you guys said... and now it fails on make with another error,
well, its not even an error, its a few warnings.
cc -O2 -pipe -DPCC_DEBUG -DGCC_COMPAT -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -DLIBEXECDIR=\/usr/local/libexec\ -I.
-I/usr/src/usr.bin/pcc/ccom/i386/..
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 12:21:46PM -, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
Tried what you guys said... and now it fails on make with another error,
well, its not even an error, its a few warnings.
cc -O2 -pipe -DPCC_DEBUG -DGCC_COMPAT -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wstrict-prototypes -Werror
It worked now! Thanks everyone!
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Otto
Moerbeek
Enviada: sabado, 17 de Novembro de 2007 12:41
Para: Pedro de Oliveira
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Assunto: Re: Compiling pcc
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 12:21:46PM -,
Hi,
I use the Sender: header for filtering. Two lines in .fdm.conf:
[...]
action obsd maildir %h/Maildir/OpenBSD/%1
[...]
match ^Sender:[ \t]*owner-([a-z]*)@openbsd.org in headers action obsd
[...]
and for replying, i use the list-reply function of mutt.
cu
Julian
On 00:28 Fri 16 Nov ,
Hello list,
using the excellent hoststated(8), I have build a reverse proxy
yellow with the snapshot from around November 3rd on an i386 box
which is connected to white (another OpenBSD host) on the left via
fxp2, and to orange (a Linux host) to its right via fxp3.
(white.fxp3) and (fxp2.yellow)
Hi,
I use the pppoe0 device to connect to my isp. And I use ntpd.
ntpd seems not to be aware of the changing ip address of the interface. It
keeps sending messages with the source address it saw on startup, as can be
seen for netstat -an or pflog.
Is there a signal I can send to ntpd to rebind
On Nov 17, 2007 4:01 PM, Rolf Sommerhalder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This unexpected behaviuor of the DNS/UDP relay then causes routing
problems as the white server is by default unaware of a route for
the source address (yellow.fxp3). So DNS responses from white do not
get routed back to
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:39:09PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:13:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:40:29PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Toni Mueller said that
could someone test this
after i created another account on my machine:
$ id
uid=1002(..x..) gid=20(staff) groups=20(staff), 5(operator), 31(guest)
$
and login using it,
and
started kde with startkde. I am not able to run konqrer the kde
browser. I do not have firefox, if i install that, will it be ok?
I am able
Hiya.
What is a convenient way for me to get the source for the man pages in
current?
Best wishes,
David
What is a convenient way for me to get the source for the man pages in
current?
the most convenient way is to get it out of the source tree.
On Nov 17, 2007 12:14 PM, David Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is a convenient way for me to get the source for the man pages in
current?
Something like find /usr/src -path */man/* ?
On Nov 17, 2007 4:24 AM, Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who says the tool is used the wrong way?
You?
I think when OpenBSD developers go and write a howto about how to use a
tool in a certain way then you can be sure it's meant to be used this way.
Please refer to:
On Nov 17, 2007 2:01 AM, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007/11/16 21:16, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:15:22PM -0500, System Administrator wrote:
On 16 Nov 2007 at 16:36, Pawel Veselov wrote:
(just trying to find a cheap SATA hardware raid card...)
Il giorno 17/nov/07, alle 16:59, Christoph Leser ha scritto:
I use the pppoe0 device to connect to my isp. And I use ntpd.
ntpd seems not to be aware of the changing ip address of the
interface. It
keeps sending messages with the source address it saw on startup, as
can be
seen for netstat
Hi,
On Fri, 16.11.2007 at 16:25:40 +0100, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-16 12:39]:
I've removed the '-s' flag for this reason, although I would very much
prefer to have it in place in the case that I have net access. I don't
know whether
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-17 19:38]:
Hi,
On Fri, 16.11.2007 at 16:25:40 +0100, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-16 12:39]:
I've removed the '-s' flag for this reason, although I would very much
prefer to have it in
* Christoph Leser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-17 17:09]:
I use the pppoe0 device to connect to my isp. And I use ntpd.
so do I.
ntpd seems not to be aware of the changing ip address of the interface. It
keeps sending messages with the source address it saw on startup, as can be
seen for
* Francesco Toscan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-17 19:22]:
I use ifstated to detect link changes and restart ntpd.
bad idea. loses all state.
just give it a little slack, it copes.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 07:48:50PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-17 19:38]:
Hi,
On Fri, 16.11.2007 at 16:25:40 +0100, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-16 12:39]:
I've removed the '-s' flag
2007/11/17, Jake Conk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just out of curiousity why do you like those cards better than 3ware?
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/opencon06-docs/index.html
3ware doesn't believe in this, LSI does.
But don't believe us, go ahead and buy 3ware or Adaptec cards. Just
don't expect
On Nov 17, 2007 6:48 PM, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007 4:24 AM, Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who says the tool is used the wrong way?
You?
I think when OpenBSD developers go and write a howto about how to use a
tool in a certain way then you can be sure
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:43:38AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hi there,
i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
and must be terminated.
/etc/rc.conf.local:
ntpd_flags=-s
On Nov 16, 2007 4:30 AM, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 16.11.2007 at 11:43:38 +0100, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ntpd_flags=-s
...
I've removed the '-s' flag for this reason, although I would very much
prefer to have it in place in the case that I have net
On 2007/11/17 10:09, Jake Conk wrote:
Try ebay for a used MegaRAID SATA 150-4 or Areca ARC-1x10...
new they're a bit more expensive than the cheap 3ware, but not
too bad.
If you don't need a lot of disk space, it will be easier to find
a used supported SCSI RAID controller, and this
Hi,
I don't think this question is really OpenBSD specific per-se but
rather an OpenSSH command.
I'm using public key authentication between my OpenBSD systems
(running ssh-agent) so that I can ssh/sftp between my systems (both
are 4.1) without having to enter a password. As part of some IPSec
On Nov 17, 2007 12:04 AM, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll take this as the documentation isn't good enough. Can you point me
to the area that isn't clear?
Thanks for the offer Marco.
I currently use RAIDFRAME for Raid 1
A few doubts that remain after I have read the man page is.
I just installed 4.1 and I get a screen full of dc0: failed to force
tx and rx to idle state
I thought it might be a harmless annoyance but after awhile
the thing drops into the debugger
I missed the exact message it gave.
I was hoping it would do it again before I have to leave but it hasn't
I
On 20:02:17 Nov 17, Henning Brauer wrote:
bad idea. loses all state.
just give it a little slack, it copes.
Probably what he means is that if you restart ntpd with ifstated and
interfere with its normal operation the clock filtering and correction
algorithms will go for a toss.
Time
On 16:54:54 Nov 17, Walter Goulet wrote:
Hi,
I don't think this question is really OpenBSD specific per-se but
rather an OpenSSH command.
I'm using public key authentication between my OpenBSD systems
(running ssh-agent) so that I can ssh/sftp between my systems (both
are 4.1) without
On 2007/11/17 16:54, Walter Goulet wrote:
What I've noticed is that when sudo (on the remote machine)
periodically asks me to reauthenticate myself prior to executing a
sudo command, the password prompt for the remote machine does not turn
off echo.
Any ideas as to why this happens?
No
On 11/17/07, Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:34:22 -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
it hints at using tools the wrong way leading to poor results.
Who says the tool is used the wrong way?
You?
me.
On 11/17/07, Die Gestalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to be explained why you have to do all these steps to encrypt
a partition. Isn't it possible to have some sort of filter driver that
simply ciphers and deciphers data as it is received, a little bit like
a GEOM plugin?
anything is
Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On 08:00:08 Nov 16, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
I though about doing something like that but the usable upload is
so variable that 60% could completely knock the normal_folk off
when it gets congested. I have 256kbit up right now and get
anywhere from as low as
On 16/11/2007, Piet Slaghekke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please send email To misc@openBSD.org and do not CC it to this address.
Hilerious
On 11/08/2007 10:54:20 AM, Soner Tari wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:45 -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
Try using cdbr as the boot record in no emulation, and put cdboot in
the
root directory of the CD.
I've tried as you suggested,
and
it works
...
For the archives here's a mkisofs command
I have cut and pasted the output from ifconfig and dmesg below.
I do have a non tulip nic I might try tomorrow.
Try a -current kernel. If it occurs, obtain a backtrace / kernel core
dump and post it. Possibly file a PR if it is warranted. It might not
get fixed quickly, so grab an
Hello
I have a laptop, Compaq Presario V3019US, AMD Turion64x2, and i tried to
install OpenBSD 32/64, since 3.9 to 4,2 on it, but the installer stops
exactly on 7th line. I tried too, writting -c after boot to introduce some
parameters or something, but nothing happended.
Could it be posible
I have a laptop, Compaq Presario V3019US, AMD Turion64x2, and i tried to
install OpenBSD 32/64, since 3.9 to 4,2 on it, but the installer stops
exactly on 7th line
Well, the 7th line could be any of about 9 or 10 things, depending on
a variety of details. As such, it says very little.
On Nov 17, 2007 4:58 PM, Rolf Sommerhalder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still, I am unsure if the DNS/UDP relay actually behaves correctly,
and if this work-around does make sense.
After a deep dive into the sources of hoststated, my current
understanding is that this is not a problem caused by
On Nov 17, 2007 4:58 PM, Rolf Sommerhalder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still, I am unsure if the DNS/UDP relay actually behaves correctly,
and if this work-around does make sense.
After a deep dive into the sources of hoststated, my current
understanding is that this is not a problem
On Nov 18, 2007 8:04 AM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, one does that by calling bind() beforehands, with the specific
local address one which uses use, instead of 0.0.0.0. With udp this
Thanks Theo for your hint. I look into this in the context of hoststated.
What still puzzles
53 matches
Mail list logo