Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 5:16 PM, Heinrich Rebehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
the 26-NOV-2007 snapshot seems to be missing xorgcfg(1).
I installed all distribution sets.
Has it been deprecated?
Yes. It has been deprecated in xserver 1.4. No one has maintained and
updated
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 11:28:32AM +0530, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
[...]
As a second note, postfix as a standalone entity may be secure, but I
am not sure how secure it will be if it starts interacting with some
other piece of software. Also, from the top of my head I can say that
postfix's
And it was great !
Thanks goes to all the organizers who set up a great event, the talks
were really interesting and highly technicals,
and it was a great pleasure to meet in person people i only know by
mailing-lists.
Lunch and breaks were perfect too, and OpenSSH party a really nice event :)
On 03/12/2007, L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't find the 'reply only to group' feature my mail client yet.. but
I just started using this email client recently. It is Mozilla Thunderbird.
Reply to all.
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:32:56AM -0500, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:05:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
There are other sources as well:
On 12/3/2007 at 7:32 AM Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
|On 21:45:37 Dec 02, Henning Brauer wrote:
| * MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-02 15:35]:
| When I run the command
|
| pfctl -sr
|
| a list of the rules is displayed, a sample line is below.
|
|pass in log quick on fxp0 inet proto
On 20:59 Sun 02 Dec , L wrote:
I can't find the 'reply only to group' feature my mail client yet.. but I
just started using this email client recently. It is Mozilla Thunderbird.
Try mutt... it has a nice list-reply function :)
Regards,
Julian
--
If you don't remember something, it
hello,
recently I've started using amd64 a bit more on my laptop because
until now I do not tested it very well. I'm facing a irq problem under
amd64/mp (amd64/up is ok) that prevents me to use the ethernet when
the cardbus is in use. for now the only way to be able to use msk0 is
to disable cbb
On 3 December 2007, Amarendra Godbole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 4:32 PM, Liviu Daia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 November 2007, Amarendra Godbole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please note that postfix does not undergo the rigorous code scrub
that sendmail goes through.
On 2007/12/02 21:22, Pau Amaro-Seoane wrote:
Now that I know that there is pjsua in ports waiting for us (it's only
-current), which seems to be compatible for windows and MacOSX and
linux,
It uses SIP, so the other party can use any SIP-compliant soft phone.
sjphone is alright as a
Marco Peereboom wrote:
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
I like that one! (; Started my day on a good note.
Always thought Fox News was really bad, but felt many disagree.
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
...
Always thought Faux News was really bad,...
There. Fixed it for you. ;)
Is anyone still getting crashes after patch 4 in 4.2?
On Dec 2, 2007 9:06 AM, Rolf Sommerhalder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 5:22 PM, David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this possibly the same memory leak mentioned below?
Thanks a lot for these insightful replies!
Kind Regards
--
Thomas
Hi,
On Sat, 01.12.2007 at 14:48:40 -0700, Philip Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, I have no personal need to claim superiority, so if your
current setup using qmail or postfix works, feel free to keep using
it.
thank you for your investigations, but in fact, I hoped to be able to
do
Hi
I have a Macintosh iBook G4 and I was wondering weather it's possible
to dual boot it (like in the I386 world)?
TIA
Paolo
On 03/12/2007, Paolo Supino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a Macintosh iBook G4 and I was wondering weather it's possible
to dual boot it (like in the I386 world)?
TIA
Paolo
Dual boot which two OSes?
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 02.12.07 17:15:00
An: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: Skype on the OpenBSD
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
David Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're interested in VoIP, then you might want to look at
Yes it is.
After install, you copy ofwboot in your root of Mac OS X and after
reboot holding O + F+ ALT + APPLE ;) and type:
boot hd:,ofwboot /bsd
but you should simply read the install instruction:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.2/macppc/INSTALL.macppc
greetz
Konrad
2007/12/3, Paolo
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:48:00AM -0500, Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi
I have a Macintosh iBook G4 and I was wondering weather it's possible
to dual boot it (like in the I386 world)?
Yes, INSTALL.macppc covers it.
-J.
ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you chose to dig your heels in over this, you could sue the German
revenue service and very likely win.
AFAIK, somebody has already tried that. That's why they granted to send
it in using the postal way for a few companies which meet certain
conditions.
Paolo Supino wrote:
I have a Macintosh iBook G4 and I was wondering weather it's possible
to dual boot it (like in the I386 world)?
It's possible. I've done dual boot OpenBSD / OS X successfully on a
mini G4. However, my attempt at triple boot OpenBSD / OS X / Kubuntu
was buggered.
The
It's possible. I've done dual boot OpenBSD / OS X successfully on a
mini G4. However, my attempt at triple boot OpenBSD / OS X / Kubuntu
was buggered.
For a trippel boot you have to use the Linux boot loader yaboot...
I've done that last year and it worked for me ... but I found out that
I
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 06:35:13PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 06:04:50PM +0100, Daniel wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 16:48:14 +
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VoIP applications generally require full-duplex audio operation (or
two soundcards, but that
* MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 14:53]:
On 12/3/2007 at 7:32 AM Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
| Is there a way for me to tell pfctl that I want to see
|
|port = 25
|
| instead of
|
|port = smtp
|
| ?
|
| short of hacking pfctl source, no.
|
|
|As per your
On 12/3/2007 at 7:06 PM Henning Brauer wrote:
|* MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 14:53]:
| On 12/3/2007 at 7:32 AM Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
| | Is there a way for me to tell pfctl that I want to see
| |
| |port = 25
| |
| | instead of
| |
| |port = smtp
| |
| | ?
| |
|
Although that solution will make upgrading more difficult without the
change being made in-tree (you'll have to rebuild pfctl after each
upgrade).
On Dec 3, 2007 1:24 PM, MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/2007 at 7:06 PM Henning Brauer wrote:
|* MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 14:53]:
Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 5:16 PM, Heinrich Rebehn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi list,
the 26-NOV-2007 snapshot seems to be missing xorgcfg(1).
I installed all distribution sets.
Has it been deprecated?
Yes. It has been deprecated in xserver 1.4. No one has
Scott Learmonth wrote:
And Khalid - sorry to hijack your thread. Most of my road warriors are
going to be on macs and too cheap to purchase VPN Tracker. Any successes
I gave I'll certainly share.
There's always OpenVPN. GUI via Tunnelblick
http://www.tunnelblick.net/
--
Joseph
This is what sysctl kern.version tells me:
kern.version=OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375: Tue Aug 28 10:38:44 MDT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
kern.version=OpenBSD 4.2-current (GENERIC) #410: Fri Oct 5 22:31:12 MDT
2007
[EMAIL
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
By the way, the following command is more useful for your purpose:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 4.2-current (GENERIC) #69: Sun Nov 18 22:43:19 CET
2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
Here you see whether
Joseph C. Bender wrote:
Scott Learmonth wrote:
And Khalid - sorry to hijack your thread. Most of my road warriors
are going to be on macs and too cheap to purchase VPN Tracker. Any
successes I gave I'll certainly share.
There's always OpenVPN. GUI via Tunnelblick
* Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 06:19]:
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
Dunno about no harm done there marco - Saying fox news doesn't do
any harm is like saying Joesph Goebels didn't to any harm - only
perpetuated stupidity..
Julian Leyh wrote:
On 20:59 Sun 02 Dec , L wrote:
I can't find the 'reply only to group' feature my mail client yet.. but I
just started using this email client recently. It is Mozilla Thunderbird.
Try mutt... it has a nice list-reply function :)
Regards,
Julian
I was using Sylpheed
Bob Beck wrote:
* Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 06:19]:
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
Dunno about no harm done there marco - Saying fox news doesn't do
any harm is like saying Joesph Goebels didn't to any harm - only
Greetings...
We are trying to use a couple routers with carp and uplinks with 2
different providers. One router as master and another one slave. The
slave getting all the routes from the master using IBGP.
The problem is that when I bring to interface of the master down to test
if the failover
mutt!
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 01:39:29PM -0700, L wrote:
Julian Leyh wrote:
On 20:59 Sun 02 Dec , L wrote:
I can't find the 'reply only to group' feature my mail client yet.. but I
just started using this email client recently. It is Mozilla Thunderbird.
Try mutt... it has a nice
Hi Patrick,
patrimith wrote on Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:02:18PM -0800:
kern.version=OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375: Tue Aug 28 10:38:44 MDT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
This is the one that I just installed. It does not report being one of
-release, -stable
Marco Peereboom wrote:
Yesterday I dug up a whole lot of stuff and I was able to see my x4100.
Next time I should be able to get it home. Sorry for the delay.
Please Marco, don't be sorry. Just for you agree to look into this is
already very much appreciated!
Anything I can do to help,
Yesterday I dug up a whole lot of stuff and I was able to see my x4100.
Next time I should be able to get it home. Sorry for the delay.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:21:54AM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/11/28 21:00, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
Tom Bombadil ??:
Greetings...
We are trying to use a couple routers with carp and uplinks with 2
different providers. One router as master and another one slave. The
slave getting all the routes from the master using IBGP.
The problem is that when I bring to interface of the master down to
* Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-31 12:21]:
Probably Bad things.
Oh-oh... I increased it to 2 minutes. Thing are a bit better now.
Shouldn't be. What rev of openbsd are you running this spamd box on?
I run it on a single ide drive, I'm probably bigger than your site.
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
It is a dynamic executable and LDD in linux says it requires:
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7eac000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7feb000)
Inside the /emul/linux/ folder in
L wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
..but does not have anything stating 'core dump' is available.
How do I go about debugging this?
p.s. I tried elf2olf -o linux on the program
This helped with the static program.. it got that
On Dec 3, 2007 5:04 AM, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/12/2007, L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't find the 'reply only to group' feature my mail client yet.. but
I just started using this email client recently. It is Mozilla Thunderbird.
Reply to all.
Alpine is another good one
L wrote:
I wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
..but does not have anything stating 'core dump' is available.
How do I go about debugging this?
Now I tried KTRACE/KDUMP..
And it says..
3640 ktrace RET ktrace 0
3640 ktrace CALL
On Dec 3, 2007 12:02 PM, patrimith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
By the way, the following command is more useful for your purpose:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 4.2-current (GENERIC) #69: Sun Nov 18 22:43:19 CET
2007
[EMAIL
I wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
..but does not have anything stating 'core dump' is available.
How do I go about debugging this?
Now I tried KTRACE/KDUMP..
And it says..
3640 ktrace RET ktrace 0
3640 ktrace CALL
L wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
ktrace ./prog
ktrace -C
kdump
28631 ktrace RET ktrace 0
28631 ktrace CALL execve(...hex crap...)
28631 ktrace NAMI ./prog
28631 ktrace NAMI /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Just talking to myself again.. sorry..
Maybe the NAMI should be looking in
No problems here, I patched around 8 machines and they all stopped
freezing up.
Der Engel wrote:
Is anyone still getting crashes after patch 4 in 4.2?
On Dec 2, 2007 9:06 AM, Rolf Sommerhalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 5:22 PM, David Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L wrote:
Just talking to myself again.. sorry..
Maybe the NAMI should be looking in /emul/linux/lib but it is trying /lib/
??
Aha.. it works if I make a folder called /lib and copy the ld-linux.so.2
library there.. so basically my question is how to get it to think the
/lib is
Hi everyone. I found some discussions about this issue, but have failed to
find anything that resolves it.
We have 5 web nodes and are using hoststated with pf to load balance inbound
web traffic between the servers. We are currently using sticky-address to
make sure that a person who starts a
I was reading about Hiawatha security features, and seems like a
perfect fit for OpenBSD goals. I'd volunteer to talk to Hugo Leisink
(the developer) and see if the code could be relicensed if the project
has interest in it. IMHO, replacing forked software with actively
developed one is a good
exim is an insecure piece of shit that makes old sendmail look good.
besides, it is not free.
Curiosity here since we are exim users... what makes it insecure?
Should we be really worried about running it?
Cheers,
g.
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andris wrote:
I was reading about Hiawatha security features, and seems like a
perfect fit for OpenBSD goals. I'd volunteer to talk to Hugo Leisink
(the developer) and see if the code could be relicensed if the project
has interest in it. IMHO, replacing forked software
On Monday 03 December 2007 20:53:31 Damien Miller wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andris wrote:
I was reading about Hiawatha security features, and seems like a
perfect fit for OpenBSD goals. I'd volunteer to talk to Hugo Leisink
(the developer) and see if the code could be relicensed if the
Hello,
I would like to know the way to filter on an IPSEC bridge. I would like to pass
all trafic to and from each side of the bridge. I don't know which interfaces
and protocols to use. I've looked all over, and seem to find minimal
information on this. Sure could use a hand.
Regards,
Tim
tim ??:
Hello,
I would like to know the way to filter on an IPSEC bridge. I would like to pass
all trafic to and from each side of the bridge. I don't know which interfaces
and protocols to use. I've looked all over, and seem to find minimal
information on this. Sure could use a hand.
Hi, apologies if it's been talked about until blue, but I'm all
manpage/google/list-searched out on this.
Using the old adage of Central Office and Branch Offices looking for
secure connectivity:
- My old and outdated understanding (last time I was involved in
planning a VPN was quite a
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:20:39PM -0500, STeve Andre' wrote:
On Monday 03 December 2007 20:53:31 Damien Miller wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andris wrote:
I was reading about Hiawatha security features, and seems like a
perfect fit for OpenBSD goals. I'd volunteer to talk to Hugo Leisink
60 matches
Mail list logo
