hi.
http://www.lfymag.com/currentissue.asp?id=13
towards the end
OpenBSD 4.6 Eclipse 3.5
OpenBSD being security guru Theo de Raadts baby, includes a number of
security features absent or optional in other OS.
Siju
Hi David
Thank you for the quick reply!
The stack trace from the console at the time of the crash:
Starting stack trace
panic(d07a8c58,0,de1b4b28,0,d8a282b8) at panic+0x65
panic(d071ad67,6,0,d031baf5,de1b4b20) at panic+0x65
trap() at trap+0x119
--- trap (number 6) ---
Hi all,
reading pfctl manpage I've seen this:
# pfctl -t test -vTshow
129.128.5.191
Cleared: Thu Feb 13 18:55:18 2003
In/Block:[ Packets: 0Bytes: 0]
In/Pass: [ Packets: 10
It was said in
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=125139976027774w=2
that stacking RAID sets is not a good idea. I.e. this
# bioctl -ih softraid0
Volume Status Size Device
softraid0 0 Online 447G sd2 RAID0
0 Online 149G 0:0.0 noencl wd1a
Just a note, although supermicro says max 2g of ram, the X7SLA-H works well with
4G of ram.
spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 2GB DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC2-5300CL5
spdmem1 at iic0 addr 0x52: 2GB DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC2-5300CL5
spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 2GB DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC2-5300CL5
spdmem1
* Leonardo Lombardo l.lomba...@jwizard.it [2009-11-18 10:23]:
Hi all,
reading pfctl manpage I've seen this:
# pfctl -t test -vTshow
129.128.5.191
Cleared: Thu Feb 13 18:55:18 2003
In/Block:[ Packets: 0Bytes:
Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
I also don't like too much translating... but can help whenever
possible (native spanish speaker).
It's just that all the people that I know that can use (thoroughly)
OpenBSD in my city can also read english very well (at least)...
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Chris Bennett
ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
There is that website that records older websites, waybackmachine or
something like that. Maybe the Mexican site has been recorded there? I will
try and look for it.
http://www.archive.org/index.php
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Chris Bennett wrote:
There is that website that records older websites, waybackmachine or
something like that.
http://www.archive.org/
Todd Alan Smith wrote:
This only happens with SSH connections? Are the rulesets identical
between the two machines? Also, why are you still running 4.2? As I'm
sure you know, there have been many improvements to pf since that
release.
No, I also see it happening with every TCP-based protocol
I've been getting frequent 'watchdog timeout' errors with 4.6:
Nov 18 18:00:13 net /bsd: re0: watchdog timeout
Nov 18 18:01:03 net /bsd: re0: watchdog timeout
Nov 18 18:18:55 net /bsd: re0: watchdog timeout
Nov 18 18:28:56 net last message repeated 4 times
Hello,
I did not yet understand very well, how the NIC drivers are
selected. Is it done while installing OpenBSD or is it
done at boot?
In the latter case, I assume, I can replace a PCI network
interface without changing any driver settings.
If the logical interface name will be different, I
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Roger Schreiter wrote:
Hello,
I did not yet understand very well, how the NIC drivers are
selected. Is it done while installing OpenBSD or is it
done at boot?
In the latter case, I assume, I can replace a PCI network
interface without changing
[...]
P.S. And this will be the last you hear about it from me. ;)
I hope this doesn't come to mean the project falls dead. I've been
reading the source and seems surprisingly simple, but those damned
regulars... hehehe.
My treat!
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:56:40PM +0100, Daniel Gracia Garallar wrote:
[...]
P.S. And this will be the last you hear about it from me. ;)
I hope this doesn't come to mean the project falls dead. I've been
reading the source and seems surprisingly simple, but those damned
regulars...
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:21:42PM +0100, Janusz Gumkowski wrote:
I'm running out of PTYs on my authpf firewall.
Simply, more than 992 (max pty limit) users are trying to log in
simultaneously.
In theory I could disable (in authpf.c) checking whether or not session
has been successfully
Hi,
we have a Dell PowerEdge R610 with two Intel PRO/1000 QP cards
connected to a Cisco 2960G switch.
Each card has four giga interfaces,
but only two interfaces per card work properly.
Works only the first and third interface of each card.
The other interfaces do not negotiate the correct speed.
now a wiki
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:33:32PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:56:40PM +0100, Daniel Gracia Garallar wrote:
[...]
P.S. And this will be the last you hear about it from me. ;)
I hope this doesn't come to mean the project falls dead. I've been
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jason Dixon wrote:
Not at all. I intentionally wrote Blogsum so I could begin blogging. I
avoided installing the bloat-heavy CMS/blogging alternatives out there
until I was satisfied it would meet my own criteria.
howabout a Blogsum LKM ? ;-)
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:00:21PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
now a wiki
And before you know, it, a social networking site.
I want you to be my friend on Dixonspace!!!
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:33:32PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:56:40PM +0100, Daniel
I was actually being serious :-)
But a little ragging never hurt anyone.
I be teh jdixon freind!!
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:37:48PM +0100, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:00:21PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
now a wiki
And before you know, it, a social networking
Bret S. Lambert wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:00:21PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
now a wiki
And before you know, it, a social networking site.
Wake me when it becomes a cloud.
Bret S. Lambert wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:00:21PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
now a wiki
And before you know, it, a social networking site.
I want you to be my friend on Dixonspace!!!
so you can draw ascii-art penises on his Dixonspace profile ? :-)
Gilles
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:37:48PM +0100, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:00:21PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
now a wiki
And before you know, it, a social networking site.
I want you to be my friend on Dixonspace!!!
Gotta have realtime plaintext chat for
2009/11/18 Janusz Gumkowski janusz.gumkow...@am.torun.pl:
Is it at all possible to have more than 992 simultaneous authpf users ?
Yes, use more than one machine.
Digging out an old post of mine, still not having any real solution
but a couple of ugly hacks instead, trying to get rid of
I am having trouble with installing a package, php5-core for OpenBSD 4.6
(i386). There is a dependency that cannot be resolved. php5-core
requires libiconv-1.12, and a package only exists for libiconv-1.13.
# pkg_add -r php5-core
Can't install
Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
Given the following resolv.conf file:
r...@pm3fw:root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
lookup file bind
search mcn.chs kapstonepaper.com pm3.charleston.meadwestvaco.com
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver 10.209.128.20
nameserver 10.209.128.26
nameserver 10.209.142.158
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:04:01 +0100
Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
Bret S. Lambert wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:00:21PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
now a wiki
And before you know, it, a social networking site.
I want you to be my friend on Dixonspace!!!
BC6lgesel Haberler GCnlCk Flash Haber
5 PKK'lD1 D0mralD1ya gC6nderildi
CcalanD1n yalnD1zlD1D D1 sona erdi. BC6lCcCbaE D1nD1n komE ularD1 D0mralD1ya
gC6nderildi bile... E imdilik 5 PKK'lD1 Ccalana arkadaE lD1k edecek;
DevamD1nD1 okumak iC'in Tiklayiniz
BC6lgesel Haberler
Haber AboneliD
Hello,
Iam running the apache in base 4.5 with the chroot.
Iam trying to run this simple script (as a test) but I cannot make it
to output anything...
I have done a cp /usr/bin/whoami /var/www/bin/ , made sure that
ownership is root:daemon, and permissions are 600, i have even tried
777
i
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:10:12AM +1100, John wrote:
I am having trouble with installing a package, php5-core for OpenBSD 4.6
(i386). There is a dependency that cannot be resolved. php5-core
requires libiconv-1.12, and a package only exists for libiconv-1.13.
# pkg_add -r php5-core
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:10:12 +1100
John john.n.t...@live.com wrote:
I am having trouble with installing a package, php5-core for OpenBSD
4.6 (i386). There is a dependency that cannot be resolved. php5-core
requires libiconv-1.12, and a package only exists for libiconv-1.13.
# pkg_add -r
I should mention things that I didn't before and reiterate others . . .
1) I am committed to maintaining this service
2) At the moment, I have a ~300G hard drive devoted to it (and willing
to devotre more, in the future)
3) I have a DSL (high-speed) connection
i'm not sure what kind of
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:23:42 -0600
Matthew Young myoung24...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Iam running the apache in base 4.5 with the chroot.
Iam trying to run this simple script (as a test) but I cannot make it
to output anything...
I have done a cp /usr/bin/whoami /var/www/bin/ , made
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:44:51 +0100
Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
# kdump ktrace.out
kdump -f ...
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
Without access to your nameservers it's not possible to be sure, but see
below -- this looks normal to me.
Given the following resolv.conf file:
r...@pm3fw:root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
lookup file bind
search mcn.chs
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:06:28 -0500
stan st...@panix.com wrote:
Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
Given the following resolv.conf file:
r...@pm3fw:root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
lookup file bind
search mcn.chs kapstonepaper.com pm3.charleston.meadwestvaco.com
nameserver 127.0.0.1
Hi,
While trying to get http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/chinacidr.txt.gz and
http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/koreacidr.txt.gz i'm getting 404's.
Have those resources been moved ?
I'm in the meantime using
http://ipdeny.com/ipblocks/data/countries/cn.zone and
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:00:02PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
Without access to your nameservers it's not possible to be sure, but see
below -- this looks normal to me.
Given the following resolv.conf file:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:21:41PM +0100, Robert wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:06:28 -0500
stan st...@panix.com wrote:
Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
Given the following resolv.conf file:
r...@pm3fw:root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
lookup file bind
search mcn.chs
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:21:41PM +0100, Robert wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:06:28 -0500
stan st...@panix.com wrote:
Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
Given the following resolv.conf file:
r...@pm3fw:root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
lookup file bind
search mcn.chs
So glad we don't have these kinds of issues...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534047
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 04:05:04PM -0800, Bryan wrote:
So glad we don't have these kinds of issues...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534047
no one offered a diff to implement that feature on OpenBSD yet ?
it can easily be done by writing a sudoKit policy :-)
Gilles
--
Gilles
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 04:05:04PM -0800, Bryan wrote:
So glad we don't have these kinds of issues...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534047
Wow that's tremendously funny.
--
DISCLAIMER: http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
This message will self-destruct in 3
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 16:55, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
acam...@the00z.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 04:05:04PM -0800, Bryan wrote:
So glad we don't have these kinds of issues...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534047
Wow that's tremendously funny.
--
DISCLAIMER:
Before everyone goes too bonkers, consider exactly how safe/dangerous
this behavior actually is on a single user machine. Food for thought.
Think to yourself: what *exactly* is the difference between the only
user account on your machine and root? How are you safe?
On Nov 18, 2009, at
Before everyone goes too bonkers, consider exactly how safe/dangerous
this behavior actually is on a single user machine. Food for thought.
Think to yourself: what *exactly* is the difference between the only
user account on your machine and root? How are you safe?
Not everyone runs
2009/11/19 Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com:
Think to yourself: what *exactly* is the difference between the only user
account on your machine and root? How are you safe?
And then you create a guest account on your netbook...
Read the comments. There are some interesting exploits for this...
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:08 -0800, Bryan bra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 16:55, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
acam...@the00z.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 04:05:04PM -0800, Bryan wrote:
So glad we don't have these kinds of issues...
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:38:38PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
Before everyone goes too bonkers, consider exactly how safe/dangerous
this behavior actually is on a single user machine. Food for thought.
Think to yourself: what *exactly* is the difference between the only
user account on
--- On Wed, 11/18/09, Bryan bra...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bryan bra...@gmail.com
Subject: OT: Have you hugged your local OpenBSD dev lately?
To: Misc OpenBSD misc@openbsd.org
Received: Wednesday, November 18, 2009, 7:05 PM
So glad we don't have these kinds of
issues...
Here's a brief overview of what I did. If it's not what you are looking
for, let me know (or we can take a more detailed discussion off-list).
I don't claim to be an expert in this. I did a lot of Googling/reading,
and cobbled together my strategy from several sources. Even then, I
think
On Nov 18, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
Before everyone goes too bonkers, consider exactly how safe/dangerous
this behavior actually is on a single user machine. Food for
thought.
Think to yourself: what *exactly* is the difference between the only
user
If you give untrusted people unsupervised access to your laptop, I
hope you have a better lock than I do.
On Nov 18, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Martin SchrC6der mar...@oneiros.de wrote:
2009/11/19 Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com:
Think to yourself: what *exactly* is the difference between the
only
Not a change i would make, but for a desktop? Not a big deal.
On Nov 18, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Eric Furman misc@openbsd.org wrote:
but making it *default* behaviour??
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:38 -0800, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Before everyone goes too bonkers, consider exactly how
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:00:02PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
Without access to your nameservers it's not possible to be sure, but see
below -- this looks normal to me.
Given the
Roger Schreiter ro...@planinternet.de writes:
Hello,
I did not yet understand very well, how the NIC drivers are
selected. Is it done while installing OpenBSD or is it
done at boot?
In the latter case, I assume, I can replace a PCI network
interface without changing any driver settings.
Hi all,
I need to build a pam-dependent plugin (openvpn-auth-pam) that requires the
pam-devel libraries; I think that's why it's failing to build. I can't seem
to find them in any OpenBSD port or package list; can someone point me in the
right direction or tell me what to look for?
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:38:38PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
Before everyone goes too bonkers, consider exactly how safe/dangerous
this behavior actually is on a single user machine.
but did they also by default restrict the system to 1 user?
it's not so much the idea that's laughable, but
You apparently have a system with multiple names and a single IP
address. Both cvsup.mch.chs and cvsup.meadwestvaco.com are assigned
address 10.209.142.151, but the reverse-lookup entry can't return both
names.
snip
You made that up. Yes it can. If it's configured to do so.
I'm guessing
To be sure, I don't think it's the best idea. But practically? For
actual users running fedora? I doubt the change makes much difference
for many of them.
The reason I even brought this up is not because I like the idea, but
because I think it is a good opportunity to reflect on what user
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Bryan Irvine wrote:
You apparently have a system with multiple names and a single IP
address. Both cvsup.mch.chs and cvsup.meadwestvaco.com are assigned
address 10.209.142.151, but the reverse-lookup entry can't return both
names.
snip
You made that up. Yes it can. If
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:28:55 -0800, Elliott Barrere wrote:
Hi all,
I need to build a pam-dependent plugin (openvpn-auth-pam) that requires the
pam-devel libraries; I think that's why it's failing to build. I can't seem
to find them in any OpenBSD port or package list; can someone point me in
Openbsd doesn't use pam, so you aren't going to have much luck getting
openvpn to use it either.
On Nov 18, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Elliott Barrere elli...@mywedding.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I need to build a pam-dependent plugin (openvpn-auth-pam) that
requires the
pam-devel libraries; I think
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:05:04 -0800
Bryan wrote:
So glad we don't have these kinds of issues...
New around here, but I'm noticing a lot of tooting of our own horn...so to
speak. With all the possible vectors for compromising a system that are
available it just sounds naive to keep touting how
Check out the port net/openbsd_bsdauth. While not PAM auth, it will
actually work on OpenBSD.
(Hint: we don't do PAM)
On 2009 Nov 18 (Wed) at 19:28:55 -0800 (-0800), Elliott Barrere wrote:
:Hi all,
:
:I need to build a pam-dependent plugin (openvpn-auth-pam) that requires the
:pam-devel
66 matches
Mail list logo
