Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Peter Miller feu...@gmail.com wrote: I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800. After a default install X won't start and i get an error which i think is caused by nv. I created a xorg.conf file using X -configure and then changed the

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote: On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:06:59 +0700, ~Lst wrote: Hi, I've already setup bgplg on my test machine, but only show version, ping and traceroute that is work (suggested from

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote: Hi Seems that you cannot connect to bgpd Are you sure bgpd_flags=-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock is present in your rc.conf.local? is the socket working? (bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show rib ) hth andre Yes,

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Andre Keller
Am 28.11.2009 09:45, schrieb ~Lst: -bash-4.0# cat /etc/rc.conf.local bgpd_flags=-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock The socket is working... -bash-4.0# bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show ip bgp memory RDE memory statistics 299643 IPv4 network entries using 6.9M of memory 599286 rib

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:42:51 +0700, ~Lst wrote: Yes, I know. If it's wrong via web, it should be the cmd show version didn't work too. Did I miss the configuration ? Let us see: 1 output of mount (the command) 2ls -l /var/www/cgi-bin Those two might be enough. Please reply ONLY to the list.

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote: Am 28.11.2009 09:45, schrieb ~Lst: -bash-4.0# cat /etc/rc.conf.local bgpd_flags=-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock The socket is working... -bash-4.0# bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show ip bgp memory RDE memory statistics

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote: On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:42:51 +0700, ~Lst wrote: Yes, I know. If it's wrong via web, it should be the cmd show version didn't work too. Did I miss the configuration ? Let us see: 1 output of mount (the command) 2ls -l

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 04:27:12PM +0700, ~Lst wrote: On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote: Am 28.11.2009 09:45, schrieb ~Lst: -bash-4.0# cat /etc/rc.conf.local bgpd_flags=-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock The socket is working... -bash-4.0# bgpctl -s

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:58:39 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote: /sbin/nologin -c '/var/www/bin/bgpctl -s /var/ww/logs/bgpd.rsock' That command does not work on my bgpd router which is working perfectly and doesn't have the OP's problem. Executing it gives a result like his This account is currently

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:45:55 +0700, ~Lst wrote: On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote: On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:42:51 +0700, ~Lst wrote: Yes, I know. If it's wrong via web, it should be the cmd show version didn't work too. Did I miss the configuration ? Let

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 09:21:55PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote: On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:58:39 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote: /sbin/nologin -c '/var/www/bin/bgpctl -s /var/ww/logs/bgpd.rsock' That command does not work on my bgpd router which is working perfectly and doesn't have the OP's

Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread Brynet
Hi, From what I can find, this is a GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M based chipset.. xf86-video-nv does not have the product ID listed in the attach structure, this could be due to incompability with the chipset or maintainer neglegence (..the driver is very rarely updated). ---

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote: Hmmm, I just remembered another setting that isn't default: Try ls -l /var/www/bin/bgpctl What does that show? -bash-4.0# ls -l /var/wwwbin/bgpctl -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 55048 Jul 10 10:07 /var/www/bin/bgpctl Rgds,

[Boletín Científico Coband] CIPA - Formación TREC en Niños y Adolescentes

2009-11-28 Thread Boletin Cientifico Coband
BoletC-n CientC-fico Coband Las actividades anunciadas a continuaciC3n se encuentran fundamentadas en la PsicologC-a Basada en la Evidencia4 aC1os promoviendo el avance de la Ciencia PsicolC3gica en Argentina Si no puede ver este correo haga click aquC-

Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:20:16AM +, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Peter Miller feu...@gmail.com wrote: I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800. After a default install X won't start and i get an error which i think is caused by nv. I

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote: Hi well I just did a installation of 4.6 and tried the bgplg thingy. it took me 4 steps: bgpd -r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock chmod 0555 /var/www/bin/bgpctl chmod 0555 /var/www/cgi-bin/bgplg httpd Did you do anything else?

Financiacion y venta de empresas

2009-11-28 Thread Finiven Rescue VPS
Todas las operaciones estan sujetas al mas riguroso secreto profesional FinivenR FINANCIACION Y VENTA !Dinero YA para lo que quieran! Distinguidos Seqores, En la actualidad han tenido la intecisn de Vender su empresa o buscar Financiacion y el resultado no ha sido el deseado, -Dificultades

having 4.6 on amd64 panicing when pfsync runs over ipsec

2009-11-28 Thread Imre Oolberg
Hi! During installing a pair of OpenBSD 4.6 amd64 (patched with current patches i.e. up to 004 and included) firewalls on IBM 3550 M2 computers i was evaluating different options to have pfsync traffic carried between them. Although i intend to use separate vlan for pfsync i tried out also how

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Andre Keller
Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst: No, I just install and followed manual. You either missed a step or run an very uncommon configuration What I don't undertand, why ping, traceroute and show version is ok, and anything else is failed (if it's via web). Well anything else is anything

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote: Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst: No, I just install and followed manual. You either missed a step or run an very uncommon configuration It might be I missed a step, Could you help where is the step that I missed ? And if

Je sur comptable a la banque BCB je vais virée $6.million a la etranger

2009-11-28 Thread Ashraf Cotu
You are invited to Je sur comptable a la banque BCB je vais virie $6.million a la etranger. By your host Ashraf Cotu: Date: Saturday November 28, 2009 Time: 5:00 pm - 6:00 pm (GMT +00:00) Location: Cher Ami Salut, Je suis MR, Ashraf Cotu

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote: Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote: Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst: No, I just install and followed manual You either missed a step or run an very uncommon

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:25:03AM +0700, ~Lst wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote: Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote: Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst: No, I just install and followed

Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread William Boshuck
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:33:22PM -0200, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote: I'm not a nvidia fanboy, but I've found the need to clarify what nvidia actually does for open source community. You mean, what nvidia does to close parts of unprincipled projects that like to call themselves 'open

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:25:03AM +0700, ~Lst wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote: Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote: [ snippzorz ] Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ? man 1 chroot

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote: [ snippzorz ] Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ? man 1 chroot -bash-4.0# man 1 chroot man: no entry for chroot in section 1 of the

Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:33:22PM -0200, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote: Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk laptop) for most people because they do support most open source systems (Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at least. I do know that OpenBSD

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:09:49AM +0700, ~Lst wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote: [ snippzorz ] Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ? man 1 chroot

Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread Brynet
Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote: Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk laptop) for most people because they do support most open source systems (Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at least. ATI(..now AMD) releases full NDA-free documentation on their

Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread Peter Miller
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, From what I can find, this is a GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M based chipset.. xf86-video-nv does not have the product ID listed in the attach structure, this could be due to incompability with the chipset or maintainer

Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread Brynet
Made the changes to nv_driver.c and built xenocara with the following # cd /usr/xenocara # rm -rf /usr/xobj/* # make bootstrap # make obj # make build Upon reboot when i use the nv driver X now recognizes my card, but it goes to a blank screen (just looks like the terminal) and

Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 02:56:05PM -0500, Brynet wrote: Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote: Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk laptop) for most people because they do support most open source systems (Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at least.

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:09:49AM +0700, ~Lst wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote: [ snippzorz ] Could

Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 07:21:37PM -0200, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote: As said: I'm not a fanboy. I thought nvidia was doing something that was good enough to me, but actually isn't helping the community at all. [...] Yea, `the community'. Who the fuck is that? Nobody managed to explain that

Re: Problem installing 4.6 on Toshiba Libretto 70CT

2009-11-28 Thread Fred Crowson
Hi Misc@ Well the Libretto successfully boots with a kernel from the 3 April 2008 and crashes with a kernel built from 4 April 2008. Using: cvs up -D3 Apr 2008 and cvs up -D4 Apr 2008 to update my source tree. The list of files that changed between the two days are: P arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC

Re: having 4.6 on amd64 panicing when pfsync runs over ipsec

2009-11-28 Thread Theo de Raadt
panic: tcp_output: template len != hdrlen - optlen Stopped at Debuuger+0x5: leave RUN AT LEAST 'trace' .. You didn't run trace, why not? You don't want the bug fixed, do you.

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread Robert
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:42:34 +0700 ~Lst slack...@gmail.com wrote: Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ? I tried running bgplgsh under chroot, still works if its via CLI but not via web. -bash-4.0# ps -aux | grep chroot www 4592 0.0 0.3 1356 2120 ??

Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv

2009-11-28 Thread Peter Miller
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote: Made the changes to nv_driver.c and built xenocara with the following # cd /usr/xenocara # rm -rf /usr/xobj/* # make bootstrap # make obj # make build Upon reboot when i use the nv driver X now recognizes my card, but it

Negotiation Skills

2009-11-28 Thread Liza Bahgat
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Negotiation Skills [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] مهارات التفاوض [IMAGE] 27-30 December ,2009 - Cairo * Negotiating is a vital management skill for dealing with customers, suppliers, and colleagues.

Re: Make utility documentation

2009-11-28 Thread Matthew Szudzik
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:58:22AM +1300, Paul M wrote: It deals mainly with gnu make, but the principles are the same. No. The book Managing Projects With GNU Make http://www.amazon.com/dp/0596006101 by Robert Mecklenburg and published by O'Reilly in 2004 deals mainly with GNU make, and isn't

004_openssl.patch

2009-11-28 Thread Matthew Szudzik
A few days ago a patch to the highly-publicized OpenSSL vulnerability http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/182304/ssl_flaw_could_have_been_used_to_hack_twitter.html was released for OpenBSD-stable at ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.6/common/004_openssl.patch What

Re: Make utility documentation

2009-11-28 Thread Paul M
On 29/11/2009, at 4:24 PM, Matthew Szudzik wrote: On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:58:22AM +1300, Paul M wrote: It deals mainly with gnu make, but the principles are the same. No. The book Managing Projects With GNU Make http://www.amazon.com/dp/0596006101 by Robert Mecklenburg and published by

Re: bgplg failed only from web not from CLI

2009-11-28 Thread ~Lst
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote: *chuckle* If you were running bgplgsh in a chroot from the cmdline you would have to execute it by invoking /bin/bgplgsh because of the changed root. ;) # man chroot # sudo chroot -u www -g www /var/www /bin/bgplgsh

Re: 004_openssl.patch

2009-11-28 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Szudzik mszud...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote: A few days ago a patch to the highly-publicized OpenSSL vulnerability ... was released for OpenBSD-stable at ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.6/common/004_openssl.patch What exactly is the effect of

Unicode implementation in console?

2009-11-28 Thread Hou, Ruoyu
Hi all, I am wondering if I could make the console display CJK character sets. From what I've searched, wscons doesn't support Unicode at least in NetBSD, though I wonder if it is a similar case in OpenBSD. The documents I process involve major eastern Asian characters, some of which appear