Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:50:49 -0400 Daniel Ouellet
[...]
> I asked one question and suggested a possible work around to solve the
> issue raise in the first place and explain the consequences of doing it
> as well.
[...]
> And asked if I was mistaken in what I suggested based on
Nice one ! saddly the rock spirit is a little bit lost in the cover version
:(
The first band to have successfully mix electro with rock was the Pink Floyd
A contempory band which is worth listening (french lyrics sorry) :
https://soundcloud.com/lafemmeressort/sets/psycho-tropical-berlin-1
Thanks
On 8/26/16 8:11 PM, li...@wrant.com wrote:
>> But my question for sure that I am not sure of the answer is if you have
>> emails that happened to have multiple DKIM signature added to the header
>> along the way.
>
> Why would you have these, if email is not getting changed after sending?
>
Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:50:47 -0400 Daniel Ouellet
> On 8/26/16 5:37 PM, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> >
> > Yes, these are all incomplete semi-solutions designed to do one thing,
> > and only one thing well: deliver you commercial email that you'd trust
> > is coming from the paying
Anybody tried Advania?
https://advania.com/cloud/open-cloud/
Thanks.
--Murk
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Jay Patel wrote:
> OpenBSD with vultr runs very smooth also it has snapshot option for custom
> Operating system which is good.
>
> here is referral link if you
Hello folks,
I'd like some help with the following rules on pf.
I'm trying to block all https requests outgoing from my network and unblock
just some IPs.
The blocked IPs are allowed to access specifics sites that are placed in files
with the domain names that I want to allow, the unblocked_ips
OpenBSD with vultr runs very smooth also it has snapshot option for custom
Operating system which is good.
here is referral link if you wanna use it :
http://www.vultr.com/?ref=6955732
Thanks,
Jay
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:10 PM, R0me0 *** wrote:
> Hello everybody !
>
>
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:54:59 -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > If the OpenBSD list admins are reading this: would it be possible to
> > make a similar change in the OpenBSD mailing list configuration?
>
> I think it's more than a config change, afaik it would mean modifying
> majordomo to do
On 2016 Aug 26 (Fri) at 08:25:56 +0200 (+0200), Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
:If the OpenBSD list admins are reading this: would it be possible to
:make a similar change in the OpenBSD mailing list configuration?
This is exactly why I hate DMARC. Some tiny bullshit change, that
requires everyone
Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:54:59 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson
> On 2016-08-26, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
[...]
> > However, the solution or workaround is to set up the mailing list
> > for the DMARC magic to do some benign rewriting of headers
>
> Rewriting
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 8:17 PM, sven falempin
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-08-20, sven falempin wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Stuart Henderson
> If the OpenBSD list admins are reading this: would it be possible to
> make a similar change in the OpenBSD mailing list configuration?
Please don't.
Those people who break e-mail for some (imaginary?) "gain" should
deal with the problems themselves instead of forcing others to make
changes.
David Coppa writes:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
>
>> Dear misc@ readers,
>>
>> just noticed that xpdf receives a bus error as soon as the fullscreen mode is
>> activated. A gdb trace follows, hoping it gives some hints:
>>
>> GNU gdb 6.3
>>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:46:35AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2016 Aug 26 (Fri) at 08:25:56 +0200 (+0200), Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> :If the OpenBSD list admins are reading this: would it be possible to
> :make a similar change in the OpenBSD mailing list configuration?
>
> This is
On 2016-08-26, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> Lazy git that I am I only quite recently configured DMARC for
> bsdly.net, and it actually had at least some of the desired effect:
> that domain's mail traffic started coming through to Google-hosted
> domains, and whenever somebody
On 08/26/16 13:54, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> that domain's mail traffic started coming through to Google-hosted
>> domains, and whenever somebody makes a new contribution to the
>> spamtraps collection[1], I get reports from DMARC-reporting domains as
>> well as the usual traces in the greylist.
i won't trust you to feed my dog,if i had one. and i am expert in finding
good dog caretaker.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Bertram Scharpf
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all, I am an experienced OS installer and I did a
> heck of partitioning in my life. Now I had some
No personal insults, please.
--
San Francisco isn't what it used to be, and it never was.
-- Herb Caen
2016-08-26 19:22 GMT+02:00 Ali Farzanrad :
> Stuart Henderson wrotes:
>
>>On 2016-08-24, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
>>> The installers partitioning tool didn't offer me a variant
>>> that keeps my existing partitions.
>>
>>If you wanted to try it again,
David Coppa:
> Can you please try the x11/motif diff below and report back?
The question isn't so much whether this fixes the xpdf problem, but
whether is breaks anything else.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Stuart Henderson wrotes:
>On 2016-08-24, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
>> The installers partitioning tool didn't offer me a variant
>> that keeps my existing partitions.
>
>If you wanted to try it again, when it asks "Use (W)hole disk or
>(E)dit the MBR?", choose E.
>
>It
On 08/26/16 14:55, Leo Silva wrote:
> I'd like some help with the following rules on pf.
> I'm trying to block all https requests outgoing from my network and unblock
> just some IPs.
> The blocked IPs are allowed to access specifics sites that are placed in files
> with the domain names that I
On 08/26/16 15:32, Pedro Tender wrote:
"In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess."
- PEP 20
"Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups!"
- Steven Seagal
You've assumed many things and you've made a mistake.
Don't blame other people's work for it.
Don't test on production/daily
Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:36:16 -0400 Daniel Ouellet
> On 2016-08-26, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>
> > The only downside is, the traditional forwarding that mailing lists do
> > *also* triggers the DMARC dark magic, and there is a significant risk
> > that
On 2016-08-26, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> The only downside is, the traditional forwarding that mailing lists do
> *also* triggers the DMARC dark magic, and there is a significant risk
> that messages sent with senders in DMARC domains via the mailing list
> to recipients
On August 26, 2016 9:32:38 PM GMT+02:00, Pedro Tender
wrote:
>"In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess."
>- PEP 20
>
>"Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups!"
>- Steven Seagal
>
>You've assumed many things and you've made a mistake.
>
>Don't blame
"In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess."
- PEP 20
"Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups!"
- Steven Seagal
You've assumed many things and you've made a mistake.
Don't blame other people's work for it.
Don't test on production/daily use machines.
Test before deploy.
On Aug
Just thought I'd post this before I delete it:
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/songs/song31.mp3
https://soundcloud.com/murk-fletcher/openbsd-song31-test
Thanks!
--Murk
On 8/26/16 5:37 PM, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:36:16 -0400 Daniel Ouellet
>> On 2016-08-26, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>>
>>> The only downside is, the traditional forwarding that mailing lists do
>>> *also* triggers the DMARC dark magic,
On 2016-08-26, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On 08/26/16 13:54, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> that domain's mail traffic started coming through to Google-hosted
>>> domains, and whenever somebody makes a new contribution to the
>>> spamtraps collection[1], I get reports from
Wow, have not heard the 3.1 release song in a long while.
It was good then, still good now.
diana
Past hissy-fits are not a predictor of future hissy-fits.
Nick Holland(06 Dec 2005)
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Murk Fletcher wrote:
Just thought I'd post this before I delete it:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Lazy git that I am I only quite recently configured DMARC for
bsdly.net, and it actually had at least some of the desired effect:
that domain's mail traffic started coming through to Google-hosted
domains, and whenever somebody makes a new
i'm trying to do the following:
i have a /64 ipv6 address block. the gateway is on a /56. so i can't
reach the gateway by default. how can i tell route to reach the gateway?
i've tried the following: route add -inet6 x/64 $thegateway
but that fails because i can't reach the gateway (i'm not on
the /56)
ds wrote:
> i'm trying to do the following:
>
> i have a /64 ipv6 address block. the gateway is on a /56. so i can't
> reach the gateway by default. how can i tell route to reach the gateway?
route add 'gateway-addr' -iface 'local-addr'
I think.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I agree. Diff below should reduce the number of copies to 2. In order
> to remove the last copy somebody has to turn bridge_process() MP-safe
> and merge it with bridge_input().
>
> Once this is done, bridge_input() can
36 matches
Mail list logo