Hi misc@,
I am trying to make audio records from my web cam but
cannot succeed in doing it.
I read the FAQ, aucat(1), audioctl(1) and sndiod(8) man pages (but I
certainly misunderstood them) and searched the mailing list.
I think they are obvious things I simply don't understand, any help
Hi Todd,
Todd C. Miller wrote on Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:21:28PM -0600:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 04:21:42 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Calling timelocal(3) deprecated makes sense to me because it is
>> nothing but a trivial wrapper around mktime(3), and the latter
>> is standardized, while
Le jeu. 23 avr. 2020 à 16:41, Antoine Jacoutot a
écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:34:20PM +0200, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> > I tried changing the following line in /etc/rc.d/rc.subr but the
> > actual timeout remains 30 sec (from 'time').
> > > [ -z "${daemon_timeout}" ] &&
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 4:47 AM Ian Sutton wrote:
>
> Following the revalations made by a misc@ poster, I am happy to present
> the following patch which increases the width of size_t from "long" to
> "long long", which is twice the width as before, on all platforms. This
> has the effect of
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:45:38PM -0400, Ian Sutton wrote:
> Following the revalations made by a misc@ poster, I am happy to present
> the following patch which increases the width of size_t from "long" to
> "long long", which is twice the width as before, on all platforms. This
> has the effect
Does pcretest start, or does it fail in the same way?
Can you post output of "objdump -p /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3.0" please?
I guess "ls -l /usr/local/lib" might give some clues too.
On 2020/04/23 20:04, Jay Hart wrote:
> Here is the output...
>
> Script started on Thu Apr 23 19:37:38 2020
>
On 2020-04-23, Ian Darwin wrote:
> So: I was able to newfs, mount, and use an OpenBSD partition which
> disklabel called 'a' and which had no trace of an fdisk partition around it.
>
> As Allan pointed out, this is not for booting from - none of those
> fdisk partitions looks very healthy.
ref: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=158763262607487=4
indeed i minded the older model IK40 with the written name (instead of
the ideogram) on it while the manufacturer's site provides info on the
latter only.
thank you very much for your time Sir!
/tru
based af
will do
On 4/24/20 8:36 AM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:25:51 -0400, Aisha Tammy
> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>> I'm hoping to port jitsi and wanted to know if anyone else is already
>> working on a port so that I don't do work that might be unnecessary.
>
>
> This kind
This is current/amd64 on an APU2.E2.
It is connected via pppoe over vlan over em as follows:
$ cat /etc/hostname.em0
up
$ cat /etc/hostname.vlan848
descr UVTNET vlan 848 vlandev em0 up
$ cat /etc/hostname.pppoe0
inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE pppoedev vlan848 \
authproto 'pap'
I did a "pkg_add -r pcre" and fixed the issue. mc is now running. Appeared
libpcre.so.3.0 was
corrupted.
Thanks for the support!
Jay
>
> On 2020/04/23 20:04, Jay Hart wrote:
>> Here is the output...
>>
>> Script started on Thu Apr 23 19:37:38 2020
>> ld.so loading: 'mc'
>> exe load offset:
Hey all,
I'm hoping to port jitsi and wanted to know if anyone else is already working
on a port so
that I don't do work that might be unnecessary.
Cheers,
Aisha
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Damien Thiriet wrote:
> Hi misc@,
>
>
> I am trying to make audio records from my web cam but
> cannot succeed in doing it.
> I read the FAQ, aucat(1), audioctl(1) and sndiod(8) man pages (but I
> certainly misunderstood them) and searched the mailing list.
> I think they
Hello,
After upgrade to OpenBSD 6.6 I noticed that net.inet.ip.ifq sysctl
metrics are no longer there. We used to monitor these values to see that
our firewalls are performing properly. Is there any other way to find
values of these counters?
Quick search through release notes and mailing lists
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:25:51 -0400, Aisha Tammy
wrote:
> Hey all,
> I'm hoping to port jitsi and wanted to know if anyone else is already
> working on a port so that I don't do work that might be unnecessary.
This kind of email should go on ports@.
Since misc@ has a very low SNR [1] don't
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:43:12AM +0200, Damien Thiriet wrote:
> Hi misc@,
>
>
> I am trying to make audio records from my web cam but
> cannot succeed in doing it.
> I read the FAQ, aucat(1), audioctl(1) and sndiod(8) man pages (but I
> certainly misunderstood them) and searched the mailing
On 2020-04-24, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:45:38PM -0400, Ian Sutton wrote:
>
>> Following the revalations made by a misc@ poster, I am happy to present
>> the following patch which increases the width of size_t from "long" to
>> "long long", which is twice the width as
Lars,
Your email didn't contain a diff.
Is there a reason for that?
I'm wondering whether it is because it is too difficult for you,
or maybe it is too difficult for everyone, or maybe you are simply
talking out of your ass by trying to assign work to other people
because that is your nature?
Ingo Schwarze writes:
> The limitation to 16 partitions definitely feels painful to me.
Well, one pragmatic solution is to add another disk -- 16 more
partitions. Not always possible, granted.
Seems like one of those numbers that was chosen long ago, when disks
had orders of magnitude less
Allan Streib wrote:
> Seems like one of those numbers that was chosen long ago, when disks
> had orders of magnitude less storage capacity they have now, and 16
> partitions really would have been more than enough.
the word "chosen" makes it seem like such an arbitrary decision.
As currently
> Note the time seqence:
> * when ifconfig says time 00:05:00, pings die
> * after 20 seconds, a LCP Echo Request comes
> * after another 10 seconds, another LCP Echo Request comes
> * after another 10 seconds, another LCP Echo Request comes
> * after another 10 seconds, a LCP Terminate Request
Hi Strahil,
Strahil Nikolov wrote on Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:16:41PM +0300:
> And who the hell needs more than 16 partitions ?
Me, and i'm quite sure many do. It's certainly not a good idea to
combine any partitions that are separate in a default install because
there are good reasons for all
HAMMER2 could be ported. There is much collaboration between OpenBSD
and DragonflyBSD already (drivers for example).
https://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/handbook/environmentquickstart/#index3h2
On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 16:48 -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
> ZFS cannot be ported to OBSD. It has an
Pretty much this. I am a huge supporter of "useful documentation" but over 90%
of what I read either code, techbooks, manuals, the list goes on is written by
people who don´t know how to do it properly.
OpenBSDs code is clean though as far as I can judge. I read through the whole
thing simply
Allan Streib wrote:
> Theo de Raadt writes:
>
> > Allan Streib wrote:
> >
> >> Seems like one of those numbers that was chosen long ago, when disks
> >> had orders of magnitude less storage capacity they have now, and 16
> >> partitions really would have been more than enough.
> >
> > the
A little bit of fun, slightly related to some of the discussion:
[1] is something that comes into my mind each time i read some of the emails
[2] is coming next
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlt5Wa13fFU
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIV4poUZAQo
Theo de Raadt writes:
> Allan Streib wrote:
>
>> Seems like one of those numbers that was chosen long ago, when disks
>> had orders of magnitude less storage capacity they have now, and 16
>> partitions really would have been more than enough.
>
> the word "chosen" makes it seem like such an
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
The limitation to 16 partitions definitely feels painful to me.
There is softraid(4). The only discipline that supports a single
chunk is crypto. Make a couple of OpenBSD RAID partitions,
set them up as crypto, partition those new crypto pseudo-devices,
up to 16
Theo de Raadt writes:
> OpenBSD has apparently become popular amongst people who can't think
> and connect "real world constraints" and "reality" with "no alternative
> decision was possible". This is very common amongst people who won't
> lift their finger.
I'm not the one complaining about
On April 25, 2020 4:09:53 AM GMT+03:00, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>Allan Streib wrote:
>
>> Theo de Raadt writes:
>>
>> > OpenBSD has apparently become popular amongst people who can't
>think
>> > and connect "real world constraints" and "reality" with "no
>alternative
>> > decision was possible".
Strahil Nikolov wrote:
> On April 25, 2020 4:09:53 AM GMT+03:00, Theo de Raadt
> wrote:
> >Allan Streib wrote:
> >
> >> Theo de Raadt writes:
> >>
> >> > OpenBSD has apparently become popular amongst people who can't
> >think
> >> > and connect "real world constraints" and "reality" with
Theo de Raadt writes:
> Reality hasn't changed. A sector is still 512 bytes, and
> disklabel has to fit in it.
OK.
Allan
Allan Streib wrote:
> Theo de Raadt writes:
>
> > OpenBSD has apparently become popular amongst people who can't think
> > and connect "real world constraints" and "reality" with "no alternative
> > decision was possible". This is very common amongst people who won't
> > lift their finger.
>
I have a dread sense that I'm going to regret asking questions, but I'm
going to do it anyway, because hey, what the hell, I can always drink
bleach.
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 19:09:53 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[snip]
>
> Reality hasn't changed. A sector is still 512 bytes, and
> disklabel has to
Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> So, and I recognize that the answer might reasonably be "go read more
> code and figure it out yourself," a question for Theo and others if you
> have a moment: why couldn't an arch expand past sixteen? It seems, both
> from the math calculating struct size (which may
35 matches
Mail list logo
