gcc not on new OpenBSD 6.7 machine, clang problems

2020-08-17 Thread Whiskey T.
Most likely I'm a dork and missed something obvious. My datacenter installed OpenBSD 6.7 on a new machine: # uname -a OpenBSD machine name 6.7 GENERIC.MP#182 amd64 # which gcc which: gcc: Command not found. gcc isn't on the machine. Yes, I'm aware that OpenBSD switched to clang. And I'm also

Re: gcc not on new OpenBSD 6.7 machine, clang problems

2020-08-17 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:05:05 -0700, "Whiskey T." wrote: > Incidentally, I need it to compile opendkim. I couldn't make clang > compile it: Why don't you use the port/package?

Re: gcc not on new OpenBSD 6.7 machine, clang problems

2020-08-17 Thread Christian Weisgerber
"Whiskey T.": > My datacenter installed OpenBSD 6.7 on a new machine: > > # uname -a > OpenBSD machine name 6.7 GENERIC.MP#182 amd64 > > # which gcc > which: gcc: Command not found. > configure:3711: checking whether the C compiler works > configure:3733: ccconftest.c >&5 > ld: error:

Re: aggr(4) not working with Intel XXV710 SFP28 on a Supermicro X11DPi-N(T)

2020-08-17 Thread Winfred Harrelson
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 03:40:47PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > On 17.8.2020. 11:46, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2020-08-15, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > >> On 15.8.2020. 0:48, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > >>> On 12.8.2020. 15:18, Winfred Harrelson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 07:52:10PM

Re: npppd failed enable pipex: Invalid argument

2020-08-17 Thread Marko Cupać
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:36:35 +0300 Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > Hello Marko. > > Can I propose you to try upcoming 6.8? We moved pppac(4) and pppx(4) > output processing out of kernel lock. pppx(4) output is still > serialised by netlock, but I hope we'll made it per-cpu before 6.8 > release. >

Re: CPU usage of httpd+slowcgi

2020-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-08-16, Kihaguru Gathura wrote: > Hi, > > It depends on the workload. I'd have thought for most things the max >> really usable at the moment is probably somewhere in the region of 4-8 >> cpu cores before kernel locking gets in the way too much. >> >> FWIW sparc64 ports builds are now done

i386, parallel port permission error?

2020-08-17 Thread Doug Moss
Is it possible with OpenBSD i386 to use the parallel port for lcdproc? More specifically: Did something change at OpenBSD i386 between 5.9 and 6.0 related to parallel port / lpt hardware permissions? Up to OpenBSD i386 5.9, I used to be able to have a working case-LCD-screen with

Re: Protectli FW1 with Intel 82583V - Interfaces errors and latency spike issue

2020-08-17 Thread Gabri Tofano
Nope, I tried here misc@/bugs@, Reddit and with Protectli but unfortunately no luck. I might have to try to install -current or wait for the next release and see. On 2020-08-16 19:30, Steve Woodward wrote: Were you able to resolve this issue? On Jun 10, 2020, at 15:59, obs...@loopw.com

Re: CPU usage of httpd+slowcgi

2020-08-17 Thread Kihaguru Gathura
Hi Alceu, The Web applications in C, httpd+slowcgi+libpq are quite fast for very heavy database querying. Older dual core machines have limited memory up to 16 or 32 GB and moving to newer machines like a T2000 or T4-1 is advantageous in the respect of better memory capacity. On the flip side,

Re: Problems with iwn wireless networking

2020-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-08-15, Julian Smith wrote: > > Ok i'll try building a current kernel in the next few days. Kernel and userland (and device firmware) should be in sync. It's easier to use a snapshot, you can install to USB stick if you don't want to update your main drive.

Re: Firefox Security 2020

2020-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-08-14, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > With the recent news. I decided to take a look again at Firefox and after a > days > use on multiple systems, it even seems to be faster than Chrome. > > I notice significant work on pledge support. Does anyone know if it's > comparable > to Chrome on that

Re: Protectli FW1 with Intel 82583V - Interfaces errors and latency spike issue

2020-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-08-17, Gabri Tofano wrote: FRW-FW1# netstat -i NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IfailOpkts Ofail Colls em0 1500xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx1317600 2351 466114 0 0 em0 1500 74.215.235/ xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

Re: question about IPsec

2020-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-08-15, Riccardo Giuntoli wrote: > Hello there nice people. > > It's possible have in the same machine IKEv2 and IKEv1 running? Not with iked/isakmpd, they conflict on the kernel interface for adding ipsec information. Possibly with strongswan. > How can I open IKEv2 socket only on an

Re: i386, parallel port permission error?

2020-08-17 Thread Theo de Raadt
Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020-08-17, Doug Moss wrote: > > > > Is it possible with OpenBSD i386 to use the parallel port for lcdproc? > > > > More specifically: > > Did something change at OpenBSD i386 between 5.9 and 6.0 > > related to parallel port / lpt hardware permissions? > > > > Up to

Re: aggr(4) not working with Intel XXV710 SFP28 on a Supermicro X11DPi-N(T)

2020-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-08-15, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > On 15.8.2020. 0:48, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: >> On 12.8.2020. 15:18, Winfred Harrelson wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 07:52:10PM +0100, Tom Smyth wrote: Hi Winfred, the intel 710 is a complex card, I would suggest that you try updating the

Re: Firefox Security 2020

2020-08-17 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On 2020-08-17 06:06, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> With the recent news. I decided to take a look again at Firefox and after a >> days >> use on multiple systems, it even seems to be faster than Chrome. >> >> I notice significant work on pledge support. Does anyone know if it's >> comparable >> to

Re: Firefox Security 2020

2020-08-17 Thread Stefan Hagen
Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On 2020-08-17 06:06, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> With the recent news. I decided to take a look again at Firefox and after > >> a days > >> use on multiple systems, it even seems to be faster than Chrome. > > Also not clear if rlbox has gone further than testing a widely

Re: Firefox Security 2020

2020-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-08-17, Stefan Hagen wrote: > Kevin Chadwick wrote: >> On 2020-08-17 06:06, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >> With the recent news. I decided to take a look again at Firefox and after >> >> a days >> >> use on multiple systems, it even seems to be faster than Chrome. >> >> Also not clear if

Re: Firefox Security 2020

2020-08-17 Thread Stefan Hagen
Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020-08-17, Stefan Hagen wrote: > > Kevin Chadwick wrote: > >> On 2020-08-17 06:06, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> >> With the recent news. I decided to take a look again at Firefox and > >> >> after a days > >> >> use on multiple systems, it even seems to be faster

new

2020-08-17 Thread porte, su
0 C Brazil P Ceará T FORTALEZA Z 60410442 O MDFSoftware I Oliveira Filho, D. A Av. Eduardo Girão, Jardim América M supo...@mdfsoftware.com.br U http://www.mdfsoftware.com.br/ B +55-85-9-89739017 X +55-85-9-96110010 N We provide commercial support for Unix/Linux. Experience support local and remote

Re: aggr(4) not working with Intel XXV710 SFP28 on a Supermicro X11DPi-N(T)

2020-08-17 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
On 17.8.2020. 11:46, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020-08-15, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: >> On 15.8.2020. 0:48, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: >>> On 12.8.2020. 15:18, Winfred Harrelson wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 07:52:10PM +0100, Tom Smyth wrote: > Hi Winfred, > the intel 710 is a complex

new

2020-08-17 Thread porte, su
0 C Brazil P Ceará T FORTALEZA Z 60410442 O MDFSoftware I Oliveira Filho, D. A. A 355 Eduardo Girão, Jardim América M supo...@mdfsoftware.com.br U http://www.mdfsoftware.com.br/ B +55-85-9-89739017 X +55-85-9-96110010 N Commercial support for Unix/Linux. Security services, setup and integration