Tommy, dear, I am female.
And generally, my apologies for the disclaimer, we work mostly in LE, and are
required by legal to put it at the end of emails, as most of you will know. I
personally do not see the point but as we deal with multi-national companies
that do the same it has become
On 14/06/2021 08.15, Stuart Longland wrote:
Secondly, isn't it a bit late to tell me _now_ that your email is
confidential _after_ I have read the body in full? I don't know how
people read emails in the European Union, but here in Australia, I
start at the top and read to the bottom, not
rop...@gmail.com (ropers), 2021.06.14 (Mon) 00:21 (CEST):
> > On 2021-06-13, ropers wrote:
> >> Sorry to disturb, but does anyone know how to contact whoever is
> >> responsible for ports.su?
> >> An email address would be great, though I'm not sure if it's okay to
> >> post that on-list. Perhaps
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 16:15:50 +
fern.tje...@aiyja.com wrote:
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments to it, are
> confidential and privileged to Etheria Services and Etheria Group, within the
> European Union, and this includes its sister companies, and to the correct
>
Hello. I have an APU4D4 running OpenBSD and acting as a router for my
home network. It connects to the Internet via pppoe(4), which uses em(4)
as the physical interface.
The router has a /etc/hostname.wg0 file that connects it as a client to
my VPN provider on boot. Then, /etc/pf.conf has a
You should apply queue on interface attached to network you want to limit
banwidth from. For example if your home network attached to 1GB em1 and you
want to limit web for certain ip addresses, perhaps something like this will
work
...
table { ip addrs list }
queue lanq on em1 bandwidth 950M
I'm trying to compile a kernel with some debugging enabled for an problem
I've having with umb, and now my problem has turning into an error
compiling the kernel :). After getting the error on my updated from 6.8 code
base, I whacked it and did a fresh checkout, but it still shows up:
-bash-5.1$
On 2021/06/14 16:15, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 08:07:15AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > just add "#define UMB_DEBUG" to if_umb.c and send the full dmesg output.
>
> Hmm, that's didn't work, I also needed to update umb_debug = 1 in the
> code? After that, I got a
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 08:07:15AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> just add "#define UMB_DEBUG" to if_umb.c and send the full dmesg output.
Hmm, that's didn't work, I also needed to update umb_debug = 1 in the
code? After that, I got a little output, full dmesg included below but
the umb part
On 2021-06-13, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I just upgraded a box that has a cell data card in it and it no longer
> seems to work :(. The card is:
>
> umb0 at uhub0 port 3 configuration 1 interface 12 "Sierra Wireless,
> Incorporated Sierra Wireless MC7455 Qualcomm\M-. Snapdragon? X7 LTE-A"
> rev
amd.
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 13 June 2021 23:23:34 Gustavo Rios wrote:
avoid autofs ? or amd ?
Which should i avoid ?
Em dom., 13 de jun. de 2021 às 18:48, Stuart Henderson
escreveu:
On 2021-06-12, James Cook wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:04:15PM
11 matches
Mail list logo
