Hello,
I recently switched to OpenBSD and love every bit of it.
Most of what I do on my workstation is programming MCUs like ESP8266 and
ESP32. However, Espressif toolchain is not OpenBSD friendly. So, I'm
planning to change the vendor. Any recommendations for MCUs with C
language SDKs supported
Hi!
It's my understanding that the Realtek network adapters are pretty
craptacular under load since they basically defer to the OS for
everything, raising an interrupt each time. Try the fourth test again
while running top and see if the interrupts (intr) spike during that
time.
On Mon, Mar 4,
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 05:11:17PM +0800, Sadeep Madurange wrote:
> Any recommendations for MCUs with C
> language SDKs supported by OpenBSD?
AVR - 8 bit
ARM - 32 bit
Especially AVRs are top of the game when it comes to
open source toolchain support.
Best regards,
Chris Narkiewicz
> On Mar 3, 2024, at 18:36, Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 05:11:17PM +0800, Sadeep Madurange wrote:
>> Any recommendations for MCUs with C
>> language SDKs supported by OpenBSD?
>
> AVR - 8 bit
> ARM - 32 bit
>
> Especially AVRs are top of the game when it comes to
>
On March 3, 2024 9:38:22 PM GMT+01:00, Pierre Peyronnel
wrote:
>Hey misc,
>
>Note : I posted on this topic in r/openbsd and before I open a bug, I
>thought I'd ask you.
>
>My OBSD router has a Realtek (onboard) and an intel (X540 pcie) network
>card, and in one particular situation I get very
Maybe look at Meshcentral as an alternative to Rustdesk. It allows proxying
over https OOTB.
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 at 19:30, Kasak wrote:
>
>
> > 3 марта 2024 г., в 00:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling
> написал(а):
> >
> > ssh can work in tap VPN mode (ssh -w) and will tunnel udp fine ; I'm not
> > sure
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 11:48:01AM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote:
>
> disklabel -h sd3 shows this
>
> # /dev/rsd3c:
> type: SCSI
> disk: SCSI disk
> label: SR CRYPTO
> duid: some-number
> flags:
> bytes/sector: 512
> sectors/track: 63
> tracks/cylinder: 255
> sectors/cylinder: 16065
>
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 12:01:12PM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote:
> oh okay
> reserved for root? I ran those commands as root, or you mean something
> else? I didn't know overhead was that big.. so this is okay, then?
> thanks for very fast reply
3.5G meta data overhead is less than
On 2024/03/03 13:06, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote:
> is there no way to know how many rounds a drive needs to be decrypted? if
Easiest way is probably to modify the bootloader to print
it (in libsa). You could also check a hexdump of the softraid
header block but you'll need to figure out the
Hello Stefan,
First of all many thanks for your work around qwx.
Here after some observations on my T14s regarding qwx.
My OpnBSD current setup is not my daily machine, but sounds that this
driver is quite stable ;).
My main message is that when running Apline Linux (in dual boot), I've got
beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote:
> But manual says this
> "If it is a DUID, it will be automatically mapped to the appropriate entry
> in /dev"
> I assumed the opposite would be true, if I did mount sd3i, and that mount
> would check it's DUID and check in fstab for it it does not do that?
No
Hello,
On 2024/03/03 15:07:34 +0100, 20 100 wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> First of all many thanks for your work around qwx.
>
> Here after some observations on my T14s regarding qwx.
>
> My OpnBSD current setup is not my daily machine, but sounds that this
> driver is quite stable ;).
>
> My
disklabel -h sd3 shows this
# /dev/rsd3c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: SR CRYPTO
duid: some-number
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 255
sectors/cylinder: 16065
cylinders: 31130
total sectors: 500117600 # total bytes: 238.5G
boundstart: 64
boundend: 500117600
16
oh okay
reserved for root? I ran those commands as root, or you mean something
else? I didn't know overhead was that big.. so this is okay, then?
thanks for very fast reply
On Sun, March 3, 2024 11:57 am, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 11:48:01AM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de
>
On Sun, March 3, 2024 11:50 am, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 10:47:31AM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de
> wrote:
>
>
>> hi list I want to know how many rounds my computer defaults to for
>> bioctl -r, so I can change it and know how stronger it is can you help
>> me?
>>
>> after
On 2024-03-03, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote:
> On Sun, March 3, 2024 12:07 pm, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 12:01:12PM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> oh okay reserved for root? I ran those commands as root, or you mean
>>> something else? I didn't know
thanks for your time!
On Sun, March 3, 2024 1:05 pm, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 12:59:08PM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de
> wrote:
>
>
>> that's why not having that reserved space can set the drive to crawling
>> speed when full?
>
> Yes, internal bookkeeping of FS space to
Den sön 3 mars 2024 10:14Sadeep Madurange skrev:
> Hello,24
>
> I recently switched to OpenBSD and love every bit of it.
>
> Most of what I do on my workstation is programming MCUs like ESP8266 and
> ESP32. However, Espressif toolchain is not OpenBSD friendly. So, I'm
> planning to change the
hi list
I want to know how many rounds my computer defaults to for bioctl -r, so I
can change it and know how stronger it is can you help me?
after reading mount manual about DUID I realized that it is not working
for me as expected
in /etc/fstab I have the same DUID I got from disklabel of that
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 10:47:31AM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote:
> hi list
> I want to know how many rounds my computer defaults to for bioctl -r, so I
> can change it and know how stronger it is can you help me?
>
> after reading mount manual about DUID I realized that it is not
disklabel -h sd2 shows this
# /dev/rsd2c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: nal USB 3.0
duid: some-number
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 255
sectors/cylinder: 16065
cylinders: 31130
total sectors: 500118192 # total bytes: 238.5G
boundstart: 64
boundend: 500118192
16
On Sun, March 3, 2024 12:07 pm, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 12:01:12PM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de
> wrote:
>
>
>> oh okay reserved for root? I ran those commands as root, or you mean
>> something else? I didn't know overhead was that big.. so this is okay,
>> then? thanks
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 12:14:14PM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote:
> On Sun, March 3, 2024 12:07 pm, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 12:01:12PM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> oh okay reserved for root? I ran those commands as root, or you mean
>
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 12:14:14PM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote:
> On Sun, March 3, 2024 12:07 pm, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 12:01:12PM -, beecdadd...@danwin1210.de
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> oh okay reserved for root? I ran those commands as root, or you mean
>
yes thanks everyone for answering
is 12G not 8 sorry
if it's default, I won't touch it then
is there no way to know how many rounds a drive needs to be decrypted? if
so, then that's good security but want to know how many rounds my computer
would do, after the crypto has been created?
I find -v
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> It might be easy, but it is wrong.
Besides extra burden on the build infrastructure, are there other
issues? Curiosity calling, as I'm not using any arm64 devices
personally.
I'd assume that such image would be very challenging to
Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > It might be easy, but it is wrong.
>
> Besides extra burden on the build infrastructure, are there other
> issues? Curiosity calling, as I'm not using any arm64 devices
> personally.
>
> I'd assume
27 matches
Mail list logo
