Re: Autoinstall + FDE

On 2023-09-14, prodejna-radian...@icloud.com wrote: > I was able to auto-install OpenBSD/amd64 except full disk encryption > (FDE). Is FDE supported in autoinstall? No, it is not. -- Please keep replies on the mailing list.

Re: autoinstall behavior on the nameservers has changed in OpenBSD 7.2

to autopartitioning template for disklabel = > http://[:xxx:xxx:2830::70]/autodisklabel > 22Location of sets = https > 23Set name(s) = -all bsd bsd.rd comp*.tgz base*.tgz man*.tgz > site*.tgz > 24HTTP proxy URL = none > 25HTTP Server = updat

Re: autoinstall behavior on the nameservers has changed in OpenBSD 7.2

28Location of sets = done 29What timezone are you in = UTC 30Exit to (S)hell, (H)alt or (R)eboot = S Thanks, Frederik Betreff: Re: autoinstall behavior on the nameservers has changed in OpenBSD 7.2 Datum: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 10:45:54 - (UTC) Von: Stuart Henderson An: misc

Re: autoinstall behavior on the nameservers has changed in OpenBSD 7.2

On 2022-11-02, Frederik Konietzny wrote: > Hi, > > for our OpenBSD PXE/autoinstall environment we are using a IPv4 PXE > server and a OpenBSD mirror with IPv6 address. Since OpenBSD 7.2 we have > an issue with the nameservers during the autoinstall process. (OpenBSD > 6.9, 7.0 and 7.1 work

Re: autoinstall with local file

Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:17:57 +0100 Sebastien Marie > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:14:16AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > I would be very surprised to hear that people are using > > vnconfig+mount+vnconfig+mount, to add such a file. Hi Sebastien, Robert, Theo, Theo, everyone,

Re: autoinstall with local file

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:01:36 -0700 "Theo de Raadt" wrote: > [...] > > That is yet another example of interactive use, of an installer > feature designed for NON-INTERACTIVE USE. > > I feel like we're being pushed to support a set of use cases which > are not core

Re: autoinstall with local file

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:06:35 + Robert Peichaer wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:20:25AM -0600, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > [...] > > The installer looks at the filesystem provided by bsd.rd itself, not > the filesystem on disk. > Thanks. -- Edward Ahlsen-Girard

Re: autoinstall with local file

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 07:21:12PM GMT, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Given that there is no official supported way to put an > > auto_upgrade.conf onto an existing bsd.rd, what would be a suggested > > way to achieve the same end result - in this case, an automated > > non-interactive, off-line

Re: autoinstall with local file

> Given that there is no official supported way to put an > auto_upgrade.conf onto an existing bsd.rd, what would be a suggested > way to achieve the same end result - in this case, an automated > non-interactive, off-line upgrade? Hack up a solution however you like. But understand it isn't

Re: autoinstall with local file

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:14:16AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > I would be very surprised to hear that people are using > vnconfig+mount+vnconfig+mount, to add such a file. I am still using this (unsupported) method for auto_upgrading all openbsd hosts I administrate. As all are running

Re: autoinstall with local file

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:14:16PM GMT, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:20:25AM -0600, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > > > The man page seems to indicate that autoinstall will work with an > > > auto_upgrade.conf file on the local machine, but specifying the path as: > > > > > >

Re: autoinstall with local file

> On my actual disk at / I have auto_upgrade.conf and when I start the > upgrade process at boot, I press s. > This will allow me to mount /dev/wd0a mnt; cp mnt/auto_upgrade .; autoinstall That is yet another example of interactive use, of an installer feature designed for NON-INTERACTIVE USE. I

Re: autoinstall with local file

> The original idea of this was to allow ... > >Welcome to the OpenBSD/amd64 6.0 installation program. >(I)nstall, (U)pgrade, (A)utoinstall or (S)hell? s ># cat <<_EOF >/auto_install.conf >> system hostname = hostA >> password for root = whateversecurepassword >> http

Re: autoinstall with local file

On 13 January 2017 at 04:20, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > The man page seems to indicate that autoinstall will work with an > auto_upgrade.conf file on the local machine, but specifying the path as: > > /auto_upgrade.conf > or > file://auto_upgrade.conf > or >

Re: autoinstall with local file

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:14:16AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:20:25AM -0600, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > > > The man page seems to indicate that autoinstall will work with an > > > auto_upgrade.conf file on the local machine, but specifying the path as: > > > > > >

Re: autoinstall with local file

> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:20:25AM -0600, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > > The man page seems to indicate that autoinstall will work with an > > auto_upgrade.conf file on the local machine, but specifying the path as: > > > > /auto_upgrade.conf > > or > > file://auto_upgrade.conf > > or > >

Re: autoinstall with local file

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:20:25AM -0600, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > The man page seems to indicate that autoinstall will work with an > auto_upgrade.conf file on the local machine, but specifying the path as: > > /auto_upgrade.conf > or > file://auto_upgrade.conf > or > file:auto_upgrade.conf

Re: autoinstall with local file

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:20:25AM -0600, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > The man page seems to indicate that autoinstall will work with an > auto_upgrade.conf file on the local machine, but specifying the path as: > > /auto_upgrade.conf > or > file://auto_upgrade.conf > or > file:auto_upgrade.conf

Re: autoinstall (eg: disklabel -T) doesn't support templates that specify partition sizes in sectors?

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016, Erling Westenvik wrote: [I'm only replying because I ran into a problem in this area and posted a patch suggestion to the tech list; a different fix was applied after some discussion.] > templates, I was a little surprised to find that disklabel(8) apparently > does not

Re: Autoinstall via netboot over VLAN interface

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:35:04AM -0700, Darren S. wrote: > I have a router on the end of a 802.1q trunk port that I'd like to > netboot for install, but this is only possible if I can PXE boot using > the correct VLAN to reach the PXE server. Some PXE boot ROMs support > this (mine does not

Re: Autoinstall via netboot over VLAN interface

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:35:04AM -0700, Darren S. wrote: > I have a router on the end of a 802.1q trunk port that I'd like to > netboot for install, but this is only possible if I can PXE boot using > the correct VLAN to reach the PXE server. Some PXE boot ROMs support > this (mine does not

Re: Autoinstall Failing When Trying to Find Sets

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:58:40AM BST, Richard Laysell wrote: Hi Richard, ./pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64: total 448072 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jun 11 09:15 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Jun 11 09:14 .. -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 46518 Jun 11 09:15 INSTALL.amd64

Re: Autoinstall Failing When Trying to Find Sets (SOLVED)

On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:19:39 +0100 Raf Czlonka rczlo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:58:40AM BST, Richard Laysell wrote: Hi Richard, Can anyone see where I'm going wrong? Not immediately obvious, but you're missing the 'index.txt' file[0]: Note: if you wish to

Re: Autoinstall without PXE.

-- Joshua Smith Lead Systems Administrator WVNET Montani Semper Liberi Sent from my iPhone. On Mar 13, 2015, at 11:39 PM, dan mclaughlin thev...@openmailbox.org wrote: On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 02:27:56 + Raf Czlonka rczlo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:02:23PM GMT, Joshua

Re: Autoinstall without PXE.

On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 02:27:56 + Raf Czlonka rczlo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:02:23PM GMT, Joshua Smith wrote: Hello misc@, Hi Joshua, Looking around the man pages for 5.6 and -current it doesn't seem like it, but is it possible to perform an

Re: Autoinstall without PXE.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:02:23PM GMT, Joshua Smith wrote: Hello misc@, Hi Joshua, Looking around the man pages for 5.6 and -current it doesn't seem like it, but is it possible to perform an autoinstall/autoupgrade with out utilizing pxe and an http server. I would like to put the

Re: autoinstall on SGI Indigo

On Friday, March 28, 2014 21:01 CET, Sebastian Reitenbach sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de wrote: Hi, reading the INSTALL.sgi with regard to autoinstall, and also the manpage I find that: The filename DHCP parameter specifies the installer mode, e.g. auto_install. On architectures

Re: Autoinstall

On 2013 Nov 04 (Mon) at 17:14:57 -0500 (-0500), Predrag Punosevac wrote: :I was driving last night so I have not had much sleep. I just want to :make sure that I am not hallucinating. Then minutes ago when I installed :the latest snapshot I was presented with an additional installation option :

Re: Autoinstall

Am 2013-11-05 10:06, schrieb Peter Hessler: On 2013 Nov 04 (Mon) at 17:14:57 -0500 (-0500), Predrag Punosevac wrote: :I was driving last night so I have not had much sleep. I just want to :make sure that I am not hallucinating. Then minutes ago when I installed :the latest snapshot I was

Re: Autoinstall

On 11/05/13 11:14, Predrag Punosevac wrote: I was driving last night so I have not had much sleep. I just want to make sure that I am not hallucinating. Then minutes ago when I installed the latest snapshot I was presented with an additional installation option Autoinstall [A] I picked out of