Re: spamd pf rules

2015-06-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015-06-11, Jason Tubnor ja...@tubnor.net wrote: As Okan stated, your 5.6 man page is still correct for 5.7. It is only of issue when you move to 5.8-Release in November. correct. On 11 June 2015 at 11:51, Edgar Pettijohn III ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote: On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:59 PM,

Re: spamd pf rules

2015-06-11 Thread Edgar Pettijohn III
On Jun 11, 2015, at 6:42 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2015-06-11, Jason Tubnor ja...@tubnor.net wrote: As Okan stated, your 5.6 man page is still correct for 5.7. It is only of issue when you move to 5.8-Release in November. correct. On 11 June 2015 at 11:51, Edgar Pettijohn III

Re: spamd pf rules

2015-06-11 Thread Jason Tubnor
As Okan stated, your 5.6 man page is still correct for 5.7. It is only of issue when you move to 5.8-Release in November. http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/pf.conf.5?query=pf%2econf - -current and 5.8, use/will use divert-to (Can't give you a link to the online pf.conf

Re: spamd pf rules

2015-06-10 Thread Okan Demirmen
On Wed 2015.06.10 at 15:43 -0500, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote: I've been using spamd for a while now. I was looking through my pf.conf and noticed that I had the following rules in regards to spamd. table spamd-white persist table nospamd persist file /etc/mail/nospamd pass in log on egress

Re: spamd pf rules

2015-06-10 Thread Edgar Pettijohn III
On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Okan Demirmen wrote: On Wed 2015.06.10 at 15:43 -0500, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote: I've been using spamd for a while now. I was looking through my pf.conf and noticed that I had the following rules in regards to spamd. table spamd-white persist table nospamd