On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:12:05PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Joerg Jung m...@umaxx.net writes:
I also know about spamd, but that is not really an option for now as the
server speaks v6 and STARTTLS, moreover I have legacy users which AUTH
on port 25 as well. This does not play
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 04:06:49PM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote:
On 2015-04-11 Sat 16:04 PM |, Joerg Jung wrote:
From my understanding, the user connects on port 25 (using STARTTLS and
SMTP AUTH), is blocked by spamd (451 temporarily greylisted for 25 min),
but usually MUAs try again some
Joerg Jung m...@umaxx.net writes:
I also know about spamd, but that is not really an option for now as the
server speaks v6 and STARTTLS, moreover I have legacy users which AUTH
on port 25 as well. This does not play well with spamd.
spamd doesn't even attempt smtp auth, but then once the
On 2015-04-11 Sat 16:04 PM |, Joerg Jung wrote:
From my understanding, the user connects on port 25 (using STARTTLS and
SMTP AUTH), is blocked by spamd (451 temporarily greylisted for 25 min),
but usually MUAs try again some seconds later...
Users connect to the submission port 587 via
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 04:10:22PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
The longer I think about it (while looking at the existing filter code), the
more I
come to the conclusion that I just should sit down tonight and write this
missing
SA filter. Based on the existing filters in -extras and the
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:44:04AM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[...]
I know about clamsmtp, spampd etc. which check/tag *after* queuing. But
since I prefer not to annoy my users with quarantine (web-interfaces),
***SPAM*** subjects, spam folders, or similar things I want to ask: Is
Hi,
I'm in the middle of migrating a rather large existing openbsd setup
with sendmail+milter, spamassassin, clamav, and dovecot as well as
virtual users to a similar opensmtpd setup. Now I stuck a bit with the
spam/virus checking.
I know about clamsmtp, spampd etc. which check/tag *after*
