hello! I came across mixx when i was browsing through gsoc ideas. I liked
the ideas in mixx, especially cover art support and midi mappings. I am a
decent c++ coder. I am acquainted to Qt. I have developed gui in Qt(mostly
drag and drop). I wanted to know how should I get started. And the mapping
From what I can tell digging around on the Net, LADSPA support in Mixxx
existed at one time, but is now broken.
I can't seem to find any info on how it's broken, or what it would take to fix
it. Does anyone know?
All I know so far is that adding ladspa=1 to the scons command line leads to
the
Hey Steven,
The LADSPA feature is one of the first efforts there was to integrate
effects into Mixxx. There were 2 GSoC projects to get it integrated but the
last mile is difficult (GUI integration, etc.). Beyond this, the projects
were too narrow in scope since they were too wedded to LADSPA and
Speaking of the developer guide:
http://mixxx.org/wiki/doku.php/developer_guide
It's unfinished but has some details of the engine and control system. If
you have worked on a sub-system of Mixxx and have good knowledge of it I
encourage you to fill out the section in the guide. I want this to be
Hi, i use mixxx for while now and would love to see effects (specially
LV2 plugins) supported.
I would like to help, I have little experience with C++ but some
experience with C and LV2/lilv.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:38 AM, RJ Ryan rr...@mixxx.org wrote:
Hey Steven,
The LADSPA feature is
about which version of Mixxx you are talking?
I'm doing all of my work in the 1.11 release branch. I want a stable version
of Mixxx with some extra features that I've implemented, so working in 1.11
seemed like my best option.
1: without interaction
2: pressing fade now (Bad track playing or
Please attach the patch to bug #1090888 and assign the bug to yourselves or
mark it as duplicate and use bug #870128 instead.
OK, done. The patch is attached to bug #1090888. Could some with write
privileges on the bzr database commit this change push it into the 1.11.0
branch, please?
I'm not sure it adds much extra value to be able to select multiple crates as
your pool.
In my experience, it does -- that allows you to have several different sources
for the next random song. I commonly want to have several categories available.
Plus, we already have an Add to AutoDJ
Hi
After looking over your patch I have a question on how the incremental scanning
will fix the GUI assert issue?
As I see it the db will be committed to at random for a short amount of time,
if your assumption is correct that a table is blocked for reading during a
transaction this block will
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Steven Boswell II ulat...@yahoo.comwrote:
After looking over your patch I have a question on how the incremental
scanning
will fix the GUI assert issue?
The patch I just submitted has nothing to do with incremental scanning.
All it does it recover better
Hey guys,
RE: The proposal we're talking about that involves selecting multiple
crates using the sidebar. I think a much simpler way of doing this would be
to make a simple drop-down in the AutoDJ section (not that we especially
have free screen real estate for it but...):
When the AutoDJ
In my experience, the queries in Mixxx do block. That's how this assertion was
hit in the first place.
It appears that a table can have multiple simultaneous readers, but only one
writer, and readers are blocked while there's a writer.
I suppose this could be an issue with how sqlite is built
Hi Steven,
all of the options for fixing track one in AutoDJ are difficult to maintain
and change the behavior of the track table in the way the user might not
expect.
After playing around with it IMHO current state is fine.
The only drawback is that a song currently loaded is possible played
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Steven Boswell II ulat...@yahoo.comwrote:
I'm not sure it adds much extra value to be able to select multiple
crates as your pool.
In my experience, it does -- that allows you to have several different
sources for the next random song. I commonly want to
Yea -- you can control the timeouts with the driver options and the
defaults might change from platform to platform. Maybe varying timeouts are
why the assertion failures weren't very widespread and are hard to
reproduce on some platforms? (e.g. some of the queries poll for the timeout
and succeed
I've been thinking over this feature and I'm not sure it's a direction we
should take.
If you can suggest an open-source jukebox app, I'll go work on that instead
and stop bothering you.
There are a bunch of great FLOSS jukebox apps out there --
Tomahawk and Banshee are two of my favorites and I
Hello all,
My name is João Reys Santos and I'm currently studying Computer Engineering
at University of Évora, Portugal.
I'm writing to this mailing list because I was looking for a Google Summer
of Code 2013 mentoring organization to work on this summer. What I found on
MIXXX, according to
17 matches
Mail list logo
