Another emacs user here. Out of the box it's nothing special, but having a
programmable text editor (and having spent over a decade customizing it to
my liking) is invaluable to me! You get out of it what you put in.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Max Linke wrote:
> BTW if you are serious abou
BTW if you are serious about switching to emacs I can recommend
following planet.emacsen[1] to get some information about new packages
and changes. The whole emacs community is very active and constantly
adds new features to it. Sacha Chua[2] has started to compile regular
summaries of the most
That sounds lovely. I always get gray hair when not using the Vim
shoutcuts. :D
Thanks for all the info.
Am 11.01.2016 um 09:36 schrieb Max Linke:
> I use emacs with vim key-bindings. It has every IDE feature I want
>
> Code-completion / jump-to-definition / syntax-chechking /
> jump-to-compile-
I use emacs with vim key-bindings. It has every IDE feature I want
Code-completion / jump-to-definition / syntax-chechking /
jump-to-compile-error and more.
It takes some time to set everything up to your liking but I found that
most packages have pretty good defaults. Plus if you don't like h
I use a pretty barebones vim config and I feel like to “make C++ / QT C++
easier” I’d have to add a fair bit of plugins / customization. I’m just curious
what you guys are using and how it works with Mixxx. (Vim as I use it, works,
and I’ve submitted small patches, but looking forward, I think I
Sublime is awesome in terms of function, but not awesome in that it is closed
source. All the other options mentioned so far are some kind of OSS license.
~RAWRR
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:02:59 -0300
Leo Combes wrote:
> How about sublime-text? Anyone have test it? Is only text editor, but
> powe
How about sublime-text? Anyone have test it? Is only text editor, but
powerfull and fast.
Regards.
El 10/01/2016 20:50, "Be" escribió:
> I use KDevelop when I work on C++. For JS and miscellaneous text
> editing, I use Kate. But why not continue to use Vim if you already know
> how to use it and
I use KDevelop when I work on C++. For JS and miscellaneous text
editing, I use Kate. But why not continue to use Vim if you already know
how to use it and you like it?
On 1/9/2016 9:38 PM, Lee Matos wrote:
> Hey Devs,
>
> In 2016 I want to start getting better at C++ and contributing more to Mi
I use Eclipse. There's a very nice Eclipse plugin for QT development
so the static compilation works almost perfectly (there are some errors
here and there). It took me a long time to bash Eclipse's bad defaults
into usable shape, but once I did I found it quite good. I don't try
to use Eclipse
Hello,
Codelite, Code::Blocks and Netbeans. If I want something done and don't
need so big editor (like VIM) I use Codelite. All stuff for C++, PHP and
Node.js I need.
But why not VIM with C++ it's not so bad..
Tuukka
10.01.2016, 14:51, Thorsten Munsch kirjoitti:
> Hey Lee,
>
> I use Netbeans
Hey Lee,
I use Netbeans on Linux. Simply clone from Github, open that directory
as a new project with existing sources and have fun. :)
Thorsten
Am 10.01.2016 um 04:38 schrieb Lee Matos:
> Hey Devs,
>
> In 2016 I want to start getting better at C++ and contributing more to Mixxx.
> I’m on a M
Hi Matos,
nice news :-)
I am using Eclipse under Linux. It is a bit work to set it up but than,
if offers all features I need.
Especially "Show call hierarchy"
I have not checked out the latest version of other alternatives like
Qt-Creator.
Here are some hints:
http://www.mixxx.org/wiki/doku.php
Hey Devs,
In 2016 I want to start getting better at C++ and contributing more to Mixxx.
I’m on a Mac and considering Xcode/Eclipse and figured I’d ask what IDE you
guys are using? (I normally do work in JS/Python so I use Vim for that.)
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
