Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-28 Thread Scott Bigham
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 08:17:23PM -0400, I wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:20:10PM +0200, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: What happens if you revert that pulldown with yuvkineco (-F 1) and take than a look at the stream ? I get the error unsupported field order and no stream. I can report

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-28 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo What happens if you revert that pulldown with yuvkineco (-F 1) and take than a look at the stream ? I get the error unsupported field order and no stream. I can report some progress on this front: upon checking the yuvkineco code for this error message, I discovered that the

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-27 Thread Scott Bigham
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 08:53:20AM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Scott Bigham wrote: The combing effect is visible with playdv, most clearly on changes of U, I thought the problem was 'juddering' which would indicate a field order problem of some

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-27 Thread Scott Bigham
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:09:03PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Scott Bigham wrote: Actually, I'm probably using the 0.2.0 release; I couldn't find any mention of an associated CVS repository. It is a bit hard to track down - try this: :pserver:[EMAIL

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-26 Thread Scott Bigham
[Hmm, this hasn't shown up on the list for twelve hours, so I'm assuming it got lost in the shuffle and resending it. We Apologize for the Inconvenience.(TM)] On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:09:03PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Scott Bigham wrote: Actually, I'm probably

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-26 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Scott Bigham wrote: [Hmm, this hasn't shown up on the list for twelve hours, so I'm assuming it got lost in the shuffle and resending it. We Apologize for the Inconvenience.(TM)] SF is just backlogged - sometimes worse than other times. I've seen

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-24 Thread Scott Bigham
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:56:05PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Scott Bigham wrote: Yeah, I couldn't find any more recent version of smil2yuv, which is my first guess as the source of that problem. If you're using the CVS version of smilutils then that's the

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-20 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Scott Bigham wrote: Yeah, I couldn't find any more recent version of smil2yuv, which is my first guess as the source of that problem. If you're using the CVS version of smilutils then that's the latest :) There were a number of bugs in te smil2wav

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-19 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:20:10PM +0200, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: What happens if you revert that pulldown with yuvkineco (-F 1) and take than a look at the stream ? I get the error unsupported field order and no stream. Ups.

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-19 Thread Scott Bigham
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 06:16:58PM +0200, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: [I wrote:] On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:20:10PM +0200, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: What happens if you revert that pulldown with yuvkineco (-F 1) and take than a look at the stream ? I get the error unsupported

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-18 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo I was having what looks like interlacing problems with a recording I'd done (via a Canopus ADVC-50 and dvgrab, for reference), so I performed the test described in section 3.4.3 of the HOWTO. Now, according to the HOWTO, I should have seen groups of two nearly identical subframes;

[Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-17 Thread Scott Bigham
I was having what looks like interlacing problems with a recording I'd done (via a Canopus ADVC-50 and dvgrab, for reference), so I performed the test described in section 3.4.3 of the HOWTO. Now, according to the HOWTO, I should have seen groups of two nearly identical subframes; what I saw