On 9-Jun-06, at 6:54 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Beau Hartshorne wrote:
>
>> On 7-Jun-06, at 7:13 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>
>>> Base seems like a good enough place for it. Ignoring performance,
>>> is backwards compatibility even an issue? I don't think it would
>>> bre
On Jun 9, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Beau Hartshorne wrote:
>
> On 7-Jun-06, at 7:13 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
>> Base seems like a good enough place for it. Ignoring performance,
>> is backwards compatibility even an issue? I don't think it would
>> break anything to camelize everywhere appropriate.
>
>
On 7-Jun-06, at 7:13 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
> Base seems like a good enough place for it. Ignoring performance,
> is backwards compatibility even an issue? I don't think it would
> break anything to camelize everywhere appropriate.
I don't really know. I replaced computedStyle entirely, and
On Jun 9, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Melkor wrote:
> Hello, if I try to apply a numberFormatter to Infinity, instead of
> Infinity I get something with dots and commas. It's a bug or a
> feature?
> =)
What do you expect to happen if you format NaN, Infinity, or -
Infinity? There isn't really any sens
Hello, if I try to apply a numberFormatter to Infinity, instead of
Infinity I get something with dots and commas. It's a bug or a feature?
=)
Regards, and thanks for a wonderful lib.
Pablo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Jun 9, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Patrick Lewis wrote:
> var compare_items = function(a, b){
> return compare(a[1], b[1])
> }
MochiKit.Base.keyComparator does exactly that:
var compare_items = keyComparator(1);
... though in this case, you might want to uppercase the strings or
something for
I think this would do it:
var json = "{1:'something', 2: 'A lovely thing', 3:'Not so nice'}"
var compare_items = function(a, b){
return compare(a[1], b[1])
}
var sort_options = function(options) {
return sorted(items(options), compare_items)
}
var opts = eval('(' + json + ')')
var s =
Em Sexta 09 Junho 2006 11:50, Arnar Birgisson escreveu:
>
> map(function (key) {
> $('yourselect').appendChild(OPTION({'value': key}, yourjsonobject[key]));
> }, keys(yourjsonobject).sort());
This will sort based on the "key", not based on what is shown to the user...
E.g.:
TODAY
-
1 -
Em Sexta 09 Junho 2006 11:50, Arnar Birgisson escreveu:
> I'm not sure if you mean sorting the elements after inserting
> them into the DOM or before. I would do something like this:
Actually, the order in sorting doesn't matter to me if the output appears
sorted to the user :-)
> map(functio
Hi
On 6/9/06, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there something that I can use to sort the options inside a select
> accordingly to what is shown to the user? I'm getting a Python dict
> (unordered) in JSON format and I'd like to sort this to make options easier
> to find when browsing
Hi!
Is there something that I can use to sort the options inside a select
accordingly to what is shown to the user? I'm getting a Python dict
(unordered) in JSON format and I'd like to sort this to make options easier
to find when browsing the list...
Thanks,
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL
11 matches
Mail list logo
