[mochikit] Re: AJAX question

2006-04-23 Thread Sam Sutch
Here is something that I made with Scriptalicous (sp?) and Prototype (required by Scriptalicous). It's a pretty heavyweight page and doesn't work in IE at all yet. But just so you know, you can do fancy stuff with JS too: http://samuraifilms.org/test It might be broken on other browsers too, I

[mochikit] Re: AJAX question

2006-04-22 Thread Pekka Karjalainen
On 4/22/06, Sam Sutch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, I'm definitly not disagreeing that javascript would be a BAD choice and Flash is just the more practical alternative. -Sam I'm not disagreeing with this, but I want to point out people do stuff with JS and dynamic HTML too. Here are various

[mochikit] Re: AJAX question

2006-04-22 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Apr 22, 2006, at 8:04 AM, SamFeltus wrote: Original question. I get Flash, but not AJAX, just trying to wrap my head around what AJAX can and can't do. Another question. I love the Making JavaScript Suck Less motto. I wish ActionScript sucked less. Is there any technical reason

[mochikit] Re: AJAX question

2006-04-21 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Apr 21, 2006, at 1:26 PM, Sam Sutch wrote: You can play/stop sounds if you add/remove (respectivly) an embed object with the wav or mp3 set to with the auto play attribute set to true. Sure, but that's stupid because Flash is available just about everywhere that is, if not more

[mochikit] Re: AJAX question

2006-04-21 Thread Sam Sutch
Oh, I'm definitly not disagreeing that javascript would be a BAD choice and Flash is just the more practical alternative. I was just saying. ;) And oh man, I don't like the Flash IDE. -Sam On 4/21/06, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 21, 2006, at 1:26 PM, Sam Sutch wrote: You