"G.W. Haywood" wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Richard Ayres wrote:
>
> > Rather than trying to manhandle it all into RedHat's directory
> > structure *I* would rebuild apache & perl etc. either into
> > /usr/local or their own subdirectory under /opt. That way you get to
> > kee
Hi there,
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Richard Ayres wrote:
> Rather than trying to manhandle it all into RedHat's directory
> structure *I* would rebuild apache & perl etc. either into
> /usr/local or their own subdirectory under /opt. That way you get to
> keep all the RedHat cruft, and keep it happy
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, John Walker wrote:
> After fighting with RedHat SWS and never being sure if what went wrong
> was my scripts' fault or some wierdness in my
> Apache/mod_perl/RedHat-SSL, I'm going to follow the instructions in the
> guide to make my own. (Would have saved a lot of time if I j
> 2) I am fairly familiar with RedHat's directory layout for installation
> of Apache. Does " --with-layout=RedHat \" work for other ./configure
> scripts or only mod_perl?
>
> 3) A question for Redhatters... Do I need to (should I) remake my own
> perl too? I think RPM is going to whine hideously
John Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After fighting with RedHat SWS and never being sure if what went wrong
> was my scripts' fault or some wierdness in my
> Apache/mod_perl/RedHat-SSL, I'm going to follow the instructions in the
> guide to make my own. (Would have saved a lot of time if I ju
After fighting with RedHat SWS and never being sure if what went wrong
was my scripts' fault or some wierdness in my
Apache/mod_perl/RedHat-SSL, I'm going to follow the instructions in the
guide to make my own. (Would have saved a lot of time if I just listened
to Stas and others 2 weeks ago.) Nee
