Re: mod_perl 2 and file upload how-to

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Alejandro Galue wrote: Hello, I need help in file uploading with mod_perl 2. Apache::Request is not compatible with mod_perl 2, and I want to know how can I upload file widthout using CGI.pm Please send me an example if possible. Simply copy the relevant code from CGI.pm. Alternatively if you ha

Re: Mod_Perl 2?

2003-05-30 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Ryan Farrington wrote: > Ok here is the error I get when using the all-in-one install for > mod_perl 2.0 > > Can't locate object method "server_root_relative" via package "Apache" > at e:/Perl/site/lib/Apache/compat.pm line 69. > > Compilation failed in require at startup.pl

Re: Mod_Perl 2?

2003-05-30 Thread Stas Bekman
Ryan Farrington wrote: Here is what the Command_Line_Lookups tells me: to use method 'server_root_relative' add: use Apache::ServerUtil (); [...] > that is it... still compiles with an error =( right, the API change. Here is the correct URL: http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/porting/comp

RE: Mod_Perl 2?

2003-05-30 Thread Ryan Farrington
stry (); use CGI (); use XML::LibXML(); use XML::LibXSLT(); 1; :: END CODE :: that is it... still compiles with an error =( -Original Message- From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:10 PM To: Ryan Farrington Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mod_Perl

Re: Mod_Perl 2?

2003-05-30 Thread Stas Bekman
Ryan Farrington wrote: Ok here is the error I get when using the all-in-one install for mod_perl 2.0 Can't locate object method "server_root_relative" via package "Apache" at e:/Per l/site/lib/Apache/compat.pm line 69. Compilation failed in require at startup.pl line 13. BEGIN failed--comp

RE: mod_perl 2 apache::session and "or die"

2003-02-21 Thread Chris Faust
ECTED] >> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:02 PM >> To: Chris Faust >> Cc: Modperl >> Subject: Re: mod_perl 2 apache::session and "or die" >> >> >> Chris Faust wrote: >> > I think it is in the locking as if I let things hang long >

Re: mod_perl 2 apache::session and "or die"

2003-02-21 Thread Perrin Harkins
Chris Faust wrote: I think it is in the locking as if I let things hang long enough and then shut down Apache, I get a error of: Can't call method "disconnect" on an undefined value at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Apache/Session/Lock/MySQL.pm line 89 during global destruction. That's a good s

RE: mod_perl 2 apache::session and "or die"

2003-02-21 Thread Chris Faust
gt;> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:55 AM >> To: Chris Faust >> Cc: Modperl >> Subject: Re: mod_perl 2 apache::session and "or die" >> >> >> Chris Faust wrote: >> > All works well except when there is any kind of problem in the &

Re: mod_perl 2 apache::session and "or die"

2003-02-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Perrin Harkins wrote: Chris Faust wrote: All works well except when there is any kind of problem in the script where the condition will die.. [...] When this happens everything to do with that script is unresponsive - I know that is a little vague but that is the best way I can describe it.

Re: mod_perl 2 apache::session and "or die"

2003-02-19 Thread Perrin Harkins
Chris Faust wrote: All works well except when there is any kind of problem in the script where the condition will die.. [...] When this happens everything to do with that script is unresponsive - I know that is a little vague but that is the best way I can describe it. What happens is the error

Re: mod_perl 2 & APache 2.0 MPM

2003-01-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Sinclair, Alan (CORP, GEAccess) wrote: All, Starting to strike the first blows with Apache 2.0. I am now wondering about thread safety with mod_perl 2. Will mod_perl support a threaded MPM Apache config ? Why using the future tense, it does support the threaded mpm pretty much from the very beg

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Terra Info wrote: Sounds good. Thanks for the help. I will patch my copy. Or just grab the latest cvs. Will all MP1 functionality be migrating over to MP2? Pretty much yes. In particular the PerlHandler Apache::Status functionality. Doug mentioned that most of its functionality works as

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-27 Thread Terra Info
Sounds good. Thanks for the help. I will patch my copy. Will all MP1 functionality be migrating over to MP2? In particular the PerlHandler Apache::Status functionality. Thanks, Tom Stas Bekman wrote: Terra Info wrote: PS: I forgot to let you know if it works on MP1. I do not have that instal

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-23 Thread Stas Bekman
Terra Info wrote: PS: I forgot to let you know if it works on MP1. I do not have that installed on any machines so if someone out there on the list could check that out and post back I would appreciate it. Everything you need is below. Here is the fix, I've messed up this part while porting. I

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-23 Thread Terra Info
PS: I forgot to let you know if it works on MP1. I do not have that installed on any machines so if someone out there on the list could check that out and post back I would appreciate it. Everything you need is below. Tom Terra Info wrote: Thanks for the help. Below is all the info you request

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-23 Thread Terra Info
Thanks for the help. Below is all the info you requested. I have also attached the test script (code below for those attachement challenged, et al;) and an example can be seen at http://dev.terranovum.com/some-bad-link/. To see what it should be doing call it directly at http://dev.terranovum.c

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Terra Info wrote: I have a script that provides custom error messages that I set up using the ErrorDocument directive (ie; ErrorDocument 400 /cgi-global/error.pl?error=400&useXML=1). When run under typical mod_cgi all works as planned and it outputs the proper stuff. When run under mod_perl it

Re: mod_perl-2 configuration problem

2002-12-19 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Carl Holm wrote: > Hello, > > After adding 'LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so' and / or > 'PerlRequire "C:/Apache2/conf/extra.pl"' > to httpd.conf , my Apache (2.0.43) HTTP server fails. I am using > mod_perl 1.99_08-dev. Any thought s > would be greatly ap

RE: mod_perl-2 configuration problem

2002-12-19 Thread Beau E. Cox
Hi - Some thoughts from a relative newbie who just recently got ap2/mp2 up and running... 1) How does is fail? Seg fault? 2) Did you add modules to Apache2 during the ap2 ./configure setp? If so, you may want to re-install it 'naked': ./configure --with-mpm=worker (-or- prefork) After you get

Re: default Content-Length calculation has been removed in 2.0 (was Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks)

2002-11-29 Thread Issac Goldstand
> Issac Goldstand wrote: > > I think I got it... I was under the understanding that each fireman could > > only hande 1 bucket at a time, but there could be up to as many buckets as > > firemen on the stack at any given time... Do you know why it's like that? > > a limitation of the current mpms

Re: default Content-Length calculation has been removed in 2.0 (was Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks)

2002-11-28 Thread Issac Goldstand
- Original Message - From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Ask Bjoern Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 11:07 AM Subject: default Content-Length calculation has been removed in 2.0 (was Re: mo

Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks

2002-09-20 Thread Frank Wiles
.--[ Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote (2002/09/19 at 01:47:39) ]-- | | On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Josh Chamas wrote: | | [...] | > So I run it again with ServerTokens Min, and get the same results. :) | > Still something different on the mod_perl headers, looks like mod_perl | > 2.x is se

Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks

2002-09-19 Thread siberian
On the Apache 2.0 note, 2.0 breaks terribly when it has to proxy chunked data. It strips the chunk length and does not replace it with a Content-Length. Bug is filed but no one in the Apache group seems to want to play with it :( Just a warning for those of you who may potentially be doing p

Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks

2002-09-19 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Josh Chamas wrote: [...] > So I run it again with ServerTokens Min, and get the same results. :) > Still something different on the mod_perl headers, looks like mod_perl > 2.x is setting Content-Length where it didn't use to. The details evade me, but I recall something abou

Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks

2002-09-18 Thread Josh Chamas
Perrin Harkins wrote: > Josh Chamas wrote: > >> I just did a benchmarks to compare mod_perl + apache versions 1 & 2. > > > Cool. > > Any idea why bytes/hit is lower on apache 2? Are some headers being > omitted? > Looks like its the Server tokens, see below. 32 bytes! Maybe on a benchmark

Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks

2002-09-18 Thread Perrin Harkins
Josh Chamas wrote: > I just did a benchmarks to compare mod_perl + apache versions 1 & 2. Cool. Any idea why bytes/hit is lower on apache 2? Are some headers being omitted? - Perrin

Re: mod_perl 2 & apache 2?

2001-10-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Michael Wojcikiewicz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Has anyone tried getting mod_perl to work in Apache v2 (the latest > beta?)... Just a quick try resulted in mod_perl2 trying to compile against > apache 1.3.20... Wasnt mod_perl v2 supposed to be for Apache v2?...

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-26 Thread Michael hall
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 01:32:29AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote: > > Just tried it here and aside from some warnings it compiled and passed all > > its tests. Can't say whether it works or not though as Msql-Mysql doesn't > > compile, you got a patch hiding for that somewhere too :-) > > sure :)

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-26 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Michael hall wrote: > Just tried it here and aside from some warnings it compiled and passed all > its tests. Can't say whether it works or not though as Msql-Mysql doesn't > compile, you got a patch hiding for that somewhere too :-) sure :) again, just compiles, not sure

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-26 Thread Michael hall
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 07:08:00PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote: > > The biggest hurdle I've faced until now is > > that DBI won't build with this threaded perl. Hopefully DBI will be updated > > since the latest version is from july 99. > > it compiles with the patch below, not sure if it actua

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-25 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Eric Cholet wrote: > mod_perl-2.0 requires perl 5.6 to be build with -Dusethreads, which turns > on threading and multiplicity. just to be clear, as you mention below, -Dusetheads isn't required for mod_perl-2.0, but strongly suggested if you use an mpm other than prefork :

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-25 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: > I agree... but to some degree I hope this has been done for many of the > major modules and the major DBI modules (eg DBD sybase)... as they ended up > having to work on ActiveState's PerlEx which uses a similar model. In a > way, PerlEx's model

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-25 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Leslie Mikesell wrote: > So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until > everything is rewritten to be thread-safe? no, -Dusethreads with 5.6.0 makes the Perl runtime (aka PerlInterpreter), re-entrant. all of Perl's internal globals (symbol table, stacks, etc.

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-24 Thread Gerald Richter
> > In the end, there may still be some threading issues that should > be watched > out for I suspect. If mod_perl 2.0 follows a similar design to > ActiveState's PerlEx, PerlEx also has some problems when the Perl modules > themselves link to stuff that is not threadsafe as a shared library. > Y

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-23 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 09:59 AM 4/23/00 -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: >On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: > > > > > > > So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until > > > everything is rewritten to be thread-safe? > > > > > > > No, mod_perl 2.0 assign a "full" Perl interpreter to every Apache

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-23 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: > > > > So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until > > everything is rewritten to be thread-safe? > > > > No, mod_perl 2.0 assign a "full" Perl interpreter to every Apache thread. So > the Perl modules itself need not to be thread safe.

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-23 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 02:51 PM 4/23/00 +0200, Gerald Richter wrote: > > > > So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until > > everything is rewritten to be thread-safe? > > > >No, mod_perl 2.0 assign a "full" Perl interpreter to every Apache thread. So >the Perl modules itself need not to be thread saf

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-23 Thread Gerald Richter
> > So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until > everything is rewritten to be thread-safe? > No, mod_perl 2.0 assign a "full" Perl interpreter to every Apache thread. So the Perl modules itself need not to be thread safe. Perl 5.6 has some nice features to clone a Perl interpret

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-22 Thread Leslie Mikesell
According to Eric Cholet: > > > > Does apache 2.0 let you run a prefork model under NT? > > > NT has it's own MPM which is threaded > > prefork ... Multi Process Model with Preforking (Apache 1.3) > dexter Multi Process Model with Threading via Pthreads > C

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-22 Thread Michael hall
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 11:59:58AM +0200, Eric Cholet wrote: > > though. Can anybody in the know, shed some light on this, just trying to > > save some work down the road as I'd like to upgrade to the perl 5.6 stuff > > now and use it with my existing mod_perl (I already use the CVS version > > a

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-22 Thread Eric Cholet
> > This is for using Apache 2.0's pthread MPM, of course you can build perl > > 5.6 non threaded and use apache 2.0's prefork model but then it's not > > as exciting :-) > > Does apache 2.0 let you run a prefork model under NT? NT has it's own MPM which is threaded prefork ... Multi Pr

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-22 Thread Leslie Mikesell
According to Eric Cholet: > > This is for using Apache 2.0's pthread MPM, of course you can build perl > 5.6 non threaded and use apache 2.0's prefork model but then it's not > as exciting :-) Does apache 2.0 let you run a prefork model under NT? Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-22 Thread Eric Cholet
> I'm more of a perl end user and plead ignorance in actually understanding > what goes on behind the scenes. In the process of considering upgrading to > perl 5.6 and according to a recent message I see its going to be required > for mod_perl 2.x anyways so I guess its a good time to start migrat