Florence Dardenne wrote:
Does mod_perl 1.26 includes the 'PerlRequire' functionality or do I need
higher version ?
All versions of mod_perl have that feature. You must not have mod_perl
compiled into that server. See this entry in the guide:
At 16:41 16.04.2002, Florence Dardenne wrote:
Hi,
I've been search all the guides and never found the answer to next
question : I have mod_perl 1.26 correctly installed with Apache 1.3.22.
When I include in the httpd.conf file this kind of line Include
/home/me/auto-apache.conf which has a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a newbie and had developed a proof-of-concept application on Apache
1.3.23/Mod_Perl-1.26-dev. We are researching into moving away from ASP/IIS
Webapplications to Apache/Mod_Perl. I am stuck with the latest Apache 2.0.35 with the
following problems.
Do you really
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a newbie and had developed a proof-of-concept application on Apache
1.3.23/Mod_Perl-1.26-dev. We are researching into moving away from ASP/IIS
Webapplications to Apache/Mod_Perl. I am stuck with the latest Apache
Both the suppositions are right! To have the proof-of-concept working in Apache, I do
have it working 100% under Apache 1.3.23/mod_perl-1.26. I had performed benchmark
studies under IIS/ASP, Tomcat/JSP and Apache/MOD_PERL and have seen the best
performance under Apache 1.3.23/Mod_Perl!
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Friends,
I am a newbie and had developed a proof-of-concept
application on Apache 1.3.23/Mod_Perl-1.26-dev. We are
researching into moving away from ASP/IIS Webapplications to
Apache/Mod_Perl. I am stuck with the latest Apache 2.0.35
with
Randy:
Thanks for your response. Here are my responses:
A few things to perhaps look at ...
- does the error message give some more specific hint of what
may be wrong?
Not at all. THE REQUESTED OPERATION HAS FAILED -- This is the message that I get
from Apache Monitor Services application.
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Arul, Rex wrote:
Randy:
Thanks for your response. Here are my responses:
A few things to perhaps look at ...
- does the service start OK, with mod_perl-2 enabled, if the
PerlRequire statement isn't there?
Yes! Apache2 server starts fine under the 'Apache Monitor
Randy:
In order to keep my Apache 1.3.23/Mod_Perl-1.26 safe, I tried installing Apache
2.0.35/mod_perl-2 on a different NT 4.0 Server with ActivePerl 628.
LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so
PerlModule Apache2
WORKS!!!
However, when I write a simple Perl CGI page, it bombs at the
Randy,
For what it's worth, I can verify Rex's experience with the exception
that I used a win2k platform instead of Nt 4. I do have use Apache2 in
my startup.pl.
Rich
Arul, Rex wrote:
Randy:
In order to keep my Apache 1.3.23/Mod_Perl-1.26 safe, I tried installing Apache
Hello Friends,
I am a newbie and had developed a proof-of-concept
application on Apache 1.3.23/Mod_Perl-1.26-dev. We are
researching into moving away from ASP/IIS Webapplications to
Apache/Mod_Perl. I am stuck with the latest Apache 2.0.35
with the following problems.
Today I
httpd.conf.default with just a single PerlModule statement,
trying to boil things down.
thanks
--Geoff
-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman
To: Perrin Harkins
Cc: mod_perl list
Sent: 8/6/01 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: PerlRequire/PerlModule and %INC
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:
There have been some messages on the Mason list about people experiencing
startup.pl being loaded twice, even without PerlFreshRestart on. I know the
server restarts during startup, but PerlRequire and PerlModule are both
supposed to obey the laws
Make sure that your PerlRequire comes BEFORE you actually want to 'use' the
module in your httpd.conf
Alternately, you could unshift(@INC, '/path/to/module') in your startup.pl
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Schlesinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 10:07 AM
I was under the impression that once I ran the
PerlRequire script, if I did the use lib command, all
my other mod_perl scripts called on that server would
have access to that library?!
Aaron
--- "Liddick, Scott" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Make sure that your PerlRequire comes BEFORE you
Aaron Schlesinger wrote:
I have a line in my httpd.conf:
PerlRequire /path/to/startup.pl
In startup.pl I have this line:
use lib '/path/to/module';
This is not being added to my @INC like it should.
try
use lib '/path/to';
use module;
Ernest
--
Yours sincerely
Mit
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Aaron Schlesinger wrote:
I have a line in my httpd.conf:
PerlRequire /path/to/startup.pl
In startup.pl I have this line:
use lib '/path/to/module';
This is not being added to my @INC like it should. Any
thoughts?
How do you know it isn;t being added? Try
* Dennis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [14 Oct 2000 16:00]:
I have "PerlRequire conf/startup.pl" in httpd.conf
and startup.pl has "1;" in it
then I start apache "/usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl start
and it says:
/usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl start: httpd started
but it looks like it's exiting
see
http://perl.apache.org/guide/install.html#How_can_I_tell_whether_mod_perl_
this and other parts of the guide should be able to help you track down the
error more...
if not, then provide some details and we'll see what we can do...
HTH
--Geoff
-Original Message-
From: J. Horner
When you start your server, make sure the error log contains a line
identifying itself as "Apache/1.3.11 (Unix) mod_perl/1.21".
Also, make sure you compiled with EVERYTHING=1
On Tue, 01 Feb 2000, J. Horner wrote:
I just recompiled Apache with mod_perl support. I followed the
directions, had
20 matches
Mail list logo
