Kee Hinckley wrote:
>
> At 2:27 PM -0500 3/23/02, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> >
> >you might be interested in Joshua Chamas' ongoing benchmark project:
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/sercrerdprou/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://www.chamas.com/bench/
> >
> >he has the resul
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Kee Hinckley wrote:
> At 2:27 PM -0500 3/23/02, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>
>>you might be interested in Joshua Chamas' ongoing benchmark project:
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/sercrerdprou/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>http://www.chamas.com/bench/
>>
>>he ha
At 2:27 PM -0500 3/23/02, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>you might be interested in Joshua Chamas' ongoing benchmark project:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/sercrerdprou/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.chamas.com/bench/
>
>he has the results from a benchmark of Apache::Registry
> Im curious as to the difference in performance when using perl scripts
with
> Apache::Registry or writing complete Apache Modules in Perl that
conform to
> the API?
Check the list archives for benchmarks by Joshua Chamas. Note that
there are other reasons to use handlers instead of Registry, w
John Von Essen wrote:
> Im curious as to the difference in performance when using perl scripts with
> Apache::Registry or writing complete Apache Modules in Perl that conform to
> the API?
straight mod_perl handlers are faster than Apache::Registry, but they lack some
of the convenience that
