On 24 May 2000, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "tayers" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> tayers> Given the above more complete descriptions I would say the usage in
> tayers> L is confusing.
>
> I agree with that, and with your general observation. From my hanging
> out on P5P, a subro
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:09:09PM -0700, Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You can only configure Apache from sections, but you can load all
> > > your modules, shared data, etc. from a file pulled in with PerlRequire.
> >
> > actually
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:09:09PM -0700, Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can only configure Apache from sections, but you can load all
> > your modules, shared data, etc. from a file pulled in with PerlRequire.
>
> actually you can, if a module defines variables in the
> Apac
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Actually, and to my surprise, PerlModule/PerlRequire is not done twice,
> at leats not with respect to reparsing. They simply don't reparse the
> modules, so mod_perl works *perfectly* without PerlFreshRestart, and
> without special measures.
right, be
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > I was under the impression that you cannot configure Apache from a
> > PerlRequire. If that is not the case (and somehow works) I'd really like
> > to get away from perlsections.
>
> You can only configure
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 11:55:09AM -0700, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was under the impression that you cannot configure Apache from a
> > PerlRequire. If that is not the case (and somehow works) I'd really like
> > to get away from perlsections.
>
> You can only configure Apa
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > example did something similar, indeed, but it had to be embedded into the
> > module source, which is somewhat inconvinient.
>
> If you don't have PerlFreshRestart turned on (it is not recommended on
> product
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> I was under the impression that you cannot configure Apache from a
> PerlRequire. If that is not the case (and somehow works) I'd really like
> to get away from perlsections.
You can only configure Apache from sections, but you can load all
your modules
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 12:52:37AM +0300, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You can control what's being reloaded and what's not:
> >http://perl.apache.org/guide/config.html#Apache_Restarts_Twice_On_Start
>
> "tayers" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
tayers> Given the above more complete descriptions I would say the usage in
tayers> L is confusing.
I agree with that, and with your general observation. From my hanging
out on P5P, a subroutine is only a closure when it sees lexical
variables an
> "M" == Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
M> On Tue, 23 May 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>> Your sub &x is a closure. That's why it returns the previous value of
M> No. In perl, a closure is *defined* as "anonymous subroutine" (see the
M> documentation). If you define it different, yo
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Your sub &x is a closure. That's why it returns the previous value of
No. In perl, a closure is *defined* as "anonymous subroutine" (see the
documentation). If you define it different, you are right, but you are not
talking about perl then.
--
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 12:52:37AM +0300, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You can control what's being reloaded and what's not:
>http://perl.apache.org/guide/config.html#Apache_Restarts_Twice_On_Start
>
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 04:07:40PM -0700, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a combination of closures and PerlFreshRestart biting
(still no closures)
My example might be misleading, since I used x before it was defined (to make
the example short). Typical examples look like this
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Your sub &x is a closure. That's why it returns the previous value of
> $x. When it gets re-defined, it should start looking at the value of the
> new $x.
nevermind what i said in the other reply about not being a closure.
you're right, it is by def
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> No, it's completely deterministic ("sometimes" == depending on the when
> the function was compiled). The technical aspect is clear (to me at
> least, but I am bad at explaining ;): the file is sourced twice, and the
> function is compiled twice (and sinc
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 11:53:04AM -0700, Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > a lot of data sharing between the httpd servers. My module requires you to
> > > call "configured PApp" at the end of the configuration section so that it
> > > ca
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 11:53:04AM -0700, Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > a lot of data sharing between the httpd servers. My module requires you to
> > call "configured PApp" at the end of the configuration section so that it
> > can pull in most of the code and big data structures
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> As a related note, I wondered why there isn't a mod_perl callback that is
> clled _before_ forking, but after configuration parsing. This would allow
> a lot of data sharing between the httpd servers. My module requires you to
> call "configured PApp" a
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:15:46AM -0500, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >my $global = 5;
> >sub set_global {
> > $global = shift;
> >}
> >othermodule::set_global 7;
> >=
> >Then, to my surprise, _sometimes_
20 matches
Mail list logo
