Dennis Stout wrote:
ARHG.
I want to stay as far away from use CGI; as possible =/
*sigh*
mod_perl and the methods available in the apache request object shuold beable
to replace CGI.pm entirely, especially when you have a highly customized
RequestHandler :/
Guess I'll see what happens, since I n
> >mod_perl and the methods available in the apache request object shuold
beable
> >to replace CGI.pm entirely, especially when you have a highly customized
> >RequestHandler :/
> >
> >Guess I'll see what happens, since I need cookie headers to work AND now
> >multiple values for one param.
>
> Hav
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 16 30
Subject: Re: select multiple
> CGI.pm does the trick for me, the multi values are seperated by \0
>
> < select name="yadda" multi>
> yadda1
> yadda2
> yadda3
>
>
&
] = yadda2 etc .
Not usable live code obviously, but you should see the idea...
-Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Stout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:52 PM
Subject:
11 39
Subject: select multiple
> Beginners-CGI;
>
> If I have a form with a lot of values (such as Tech ID, Tech Name, Tech
> Queues..) and one of the fields is a select multiple, with a varied amount
of
> options selected, how are those values sent to the cgi script?
>
> Is it some
> Because there is no way to create a delimiter that the potential data
doesn't contain, the browser doesn't have the option to choose an arbitrary
delimiter like a comma, or the like. So (though I can't speak for all
browsers most will do the same) each value is passed with the same key, so
your
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Jim Winstead wrote:
> On Apr 27, Jim Winstead wrote:
> > Is it just me, or does libapreq not handle the response from > multiple> correctly? It appears to only make one of the values
> > accessible.
> >
> > From what I can tell, this appears to go all the way down to the
>
On Apr 27, Jim Winstead wrote:
> Is it just me, or does libapreq not handle the response from multiple> correctly? It appears to only make one of the values
> accessible.
>
> From what I can tell, this appears to go all the way down to the
> Apache::Table implementation, where the underlying Apa
Is it just me, or does libapreq not handle the response from correctly? It appears to only make one of the values
accessible.
>From what I can tell, this appears to go all the way down to the
Apache::Table implementation, where the underlying Apache data
structure does not quite have the perl se