- Original Message -
From: "Randal L. Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Bi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "md" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Peter" == Peter Bi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> I have a question regarding to the cached files. Although the
Peter> maximal period is set to be 24 hours in httpd.conf's proxy
Peter> settings, many of the files, which were cached from the backend
Peter> mod_perl dynamical program, ar
rkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "md" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: when to mod_perl?
> >>>>> "Perrin" == Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL
> "Perrin" == Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Perrin> Static content is easy; just don't serve it from mod_perl. The proxy
Perrin> approach is good, and so is a separate image server (which you can
Perrin> host on the same machine). I've found thttpd to be an amazingly
Perrin> ef
md wrote:
> I was just a bit worried about the amount of static
> content. In the past I've had a lot more hardware to
> work with and I never had to worry about it much.
Static content is easy; just don't serve it from mod_perl. The proxy
approach is good, and so is a separate image server (wh
At 9:52 Uhr +0200 25.06.2002, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
>FastCGI has slightly better speed, but I have seen it hanging (and it does
>not look like support for FastCGI is going to be huge in the futuer),
It took mod_perl ages (i.e. until mod_accel has come up) to get an as
decent proxying setup
Greetings.
[...]
> includes a
> big chunk of the wisdow that passed through this list in the
> last 5 years.
I know this is frivolous but:
wisdow= wisdom+windows+widows ?
Three in one - Humpty Dumpty would have been delighted
Just to avoid making this contribution to the thread utterly
Peter Bi wrote:
> wait a second ...
>
> don't forget using proxy: it saves you a lot of dynamical calls, especially
> if you have also a database.
good point, Peter. And there are many others. It's the best if you can
take some time and read the guide before you start coding. It includes a
big
ED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: when to mod_perl?
>
> --- Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In any case we are talking about registry scripts,
> > aren't we? In that
> > case it takes very little time to turn it on and off
> >
--- Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In any case we are talking about registry scripts,
> aren't we? In that
> case it takes very little time to turn it on and off
> and test what is
> better. Unless you are talking about writing full
> fledged mod_perl API
> handlers, which is only wh
md wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on a dynamic site that I originally
> thought I would do with mod_perl. Now after reviewing
> the requirements and available hardware, I wonder if
> mod_perl will be my best solution.
>
> The machine will not be a huge box (though I wasn't
> provided much in th
--- Cees Hek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would build your application using plain old CGI,
> following the guidlines that
> mod_perl provides for running CGI applications under
> the Apache::Registry
> module. If you properly analyse your application,
> and build small tight CGI
> scripts,
Quoting md <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on a dynamic site that I originally
> thought I would do with mod_perl. Now after reviewing
> the requirements and available hardware, I wonder if
> mod_perl will be my best solution.
>
> The machine will not be a huge box (though I wasn'
you're in the mod of
course ;)
David LeBlanc
Seattle, WA USA
> -Original Message-
> From: md [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 19:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: when to mod_perl?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on a dynam
Hello,
I'm working on a dynamic site that I originally
thought I would do with mod_perl. Now after reviewing
the requirements and available hardware, I wonder if
mod_perl will be my best solution.
The machine will not be a huge box (though I wasn't
provided much in the way of specs) and will onl
15 matches
Mail list logo
