At 04:46 PM 7/5/2001 -0500, Purcell, Scott wrote:
Hello,
NT question.
I believe that Apache 2 is out for NT, and was wondering if apache 2 works
with mod_perl? I am running Apache 1.3.20 and mod_perl 1.25_01-dev. Can or
should we start converting to Apache 2?
Just curous about some time frames
PROTECTED]Gunther Birznieks
To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Matt Sergeant ;
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Joachim Zobel
Cc: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 6:24 AM
Subject: [OT]: Re: Just a few good men? Was: ignored (again)
At 07:44 AM 7/5/2001 +, Matt Sergeant wrote
Purcell
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
At 06:16 PM 7/7/2001 -0700, brian moseley wrote:
On 7 Jul 2001, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Yes. Writing a templating system in Perl is trivial.
Writing a *useful* templating system in Perl is
demonstratably hard.
unless you keep application features in a separate layer
from the templating
At 03:44 PM 7/15/2001 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Looks like Camelot, the organisers of ApacheCon (and other conferences,
such as XML Dev Con - a conference I've spoken at a number of times), are
going out of business. Those of you who know the employees at Camelot will
Odd, I got the letter for
At 01:19 PM 7/14/2001 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ken Williams
To: modperl
Sent: 7/14/01 11:48 AM
Subject: BOF?
Yo,
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html .
Is one
At 12:10 AM 7/16/2001 -0500, James G Smith wrote:
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
At 11:31 AM 7/16/2001 -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
At 10:46 AM 07/16/01 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
Are there any requests other than price for next year? What would you
like to see? What could you do without?
Well, this is more along the price issue that you don't want to hear about,
but
At 10:46 AM 7/16/2001 -0600, you wrote:
Matt Sergeant writes:
I doubt it's the last one we'll see fall... I suspect TPC will be a
shadow of its former self... :(
for four years arguing that it should be cheaper. If you feel that
there'd be more attendees at a lower price, then I suggest you
2001] [error] Undefined subroutine
Apache::ROOTwww_2emy_2ddomain_2ecom::cgi_2dbin::pads::welcome_2epl::ReadPar
se called at /driveb/usr/web/webroot/cgi-bin/pads/welcome.pl line 7.
Any info would be appreciated!
John
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL
/) |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
0xE0FA561B - Fingerprint:
7E18 C018 D623 A57B 7F37 D902 8C84 7675 E0FA 561B
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
audience.
--Anonymous
Moving the mouse won't get you into trouble... Clicking it might.
--Anonymous
PGP Key 0xE0FA561B - Fingerprint:
7E18 C018 D623 A57B 7F37 D902 8C84 7675 E0FA 561B
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED
At 01:19 AM 7/26/2001 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote:
[snipped]
I see what you mean. I'm not dealing with client certs (yet), and I'm
thinking that when the system that I'm testing now goes production, it'll be
a front-end SSL, back-end non-SSL sorta deal... But that won't work for now
due to
At 02:44 PM 8/1/2001 -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
When you've had your fill of wrestling over mySQL vs PostGres and stored
procs versus inline SQL (I know I have long ago)
You guys should definitely read the following:
http
$dbh
when Crequire 'db.pl'; is called.
What should I do?
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
At 07:16 PM 8/1/2001 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
I have a CGI application where I do:
require 'db.pl';
where db.pl defines some functions and variables related to connecting to
the database, and then executes C$dbh = DBI-connect(...).
snip
I can get around this by changing
At 07:18 PM 8/1/2001 -0700, Nick Tonkin wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
I have a CGI application where I do:
require 'db.pl';
where db.pl defines some functions and variables related to connecting to
the database, and then executes C$dbh = DBI-connect(...).
I tried
://perlmonth.com/
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
/;
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
scenario. I would be curious to hear about
some real world (as opposed to academic) scenarios about it being an issue.
Later,
Gunther
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
At 12:10 PM 8/11/2001 -0400, Stephen Adkins wrote:
Hi,
At 04:42 PM 8/11/2001 +0200, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 09:26 AM 8/11/01 -0500, Jim Smith wrote:
If we want better QA, I'd propose requiring approval from someone on that
list before a module is put anywhere in the heirarchy other than
?
This is rather off topic for mod_perl and should (imho) belong on a perl
list instead. Can I request any followups be taken to private mail or a
more suitable list?
Thanks,
Dave
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology
. eg #!/usr/bin/perl is
resolved by default ( I think ) to c:\usr\bin\perl.exe
So you may wish to be truly explicit and use #!c:\perl\bin\perl.exe
Instead... (You may have to escape the \ but I forget).
Thanks,
Scott Purcell
__
Gunther Birznieks
===
This email message may contain the Ebola virus.
The sender is not responsible for any death, destruction,
reflux or tinitis that may result from reading this message.
The sender's lawyer forces him to write this crap.
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL
/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://eXtropia.com/
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web
Hey guys..MASSIVELY OFF TOPIC!! :( :( :(
At 12:24 AM 10/3/2001 -0400, Michael Bacarella wrote:
I've had about two years of experience with perl, and one year of
experience with mod_perl and MySQL.
I've been doing contract programming jobs for people and charged by the
hour. The
://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/10/17/etoys.html
Yup, this is an excellent read. Thanks Perrin.
Greg
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
with all the support.
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
At 08:46 PM 10/23/2001, Rob Nagler wrote:
is easier and more standardized, and well documented. But I feel like
coding front-end web applications is much easier in Perl where the workflow
bits change all the time. For this, I like using SOAP on the backend Java
server and SOAP on the
At 09:45 PM 10/23/2001, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
OK, so what are we missing?
Based on the comments I've seen here over the years, and some on Slashdot,
the thing that seems to worry people the most is the lack of an obvious
message queue API in Perl. I've seen plenty of
At 10:36 PM 10/23/2001, Leon Brocard wrote:
Perrin Harkins sent the following bits through the ether:
Perhaps a port of JMS is in order.
Interestingly, I've been thinking along the same lines. Spread
(http://www.spread.org/) can be used for the publish/subscribe
messaging domain but queueing
At 03:38 AM 10/24/2001, Stephen Adkins wrote:
At 02:28 PM 10/23/2001 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Stephen Adkins wrote:
If no one suggests an appropriate list, I propose starting a p2ee group
Can I just say that P2EE is a horrible, horrible name? It includes the
Java version number
One important thing
THERE IS ALREADY A P5EE MAILING LIST GUYS!!
:)
So basically if you want to add your feedback, go there! It's already done
but it's not too late to add feedback. :)
email ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:36 AM 10/29/2001, Medi Montaseri wrote:
Similarly, this concept of
At 01:34 AM 11/23/2001, Mark Maunder wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
Step three: Once you've given them 90 days after date of invoice, get a
solicitor (not a barrister) to draft a threatening letter. It'll cost you
about $100. I'm afraid you'll have to give them another 30 days at this
C'mon guys remember to add OT to your off topic messages! It's not that hard.
:)
At 05:14 PM 10/10/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know where I can get paid more than AU$10/hour (US$4.90 to US$5
per hour) for my mod_perl programming...
You guys in America get $100US per hour?! My
?
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
At 11:13 PM 10/16/01, Dominique Quatravaux wrote:
also does modperl support object oriented programming?
Well yes it does indeed (see any good book on Perl, such as
«advanced Perl programming» from O'Reilly).
As for the remaining of the question, I've been wondering for myself if
there
At 01:28 PM 10/17/01, Ilya Martynov wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001 22:07:47 -0500 (CDT), Dave Rolsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DR On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
I would venture to say that some of the mod_perl-only toolkits have some
cases of being better designed than ours
At 10:19 PM 12/22/2001, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:11:33AM -0800, brian moseley wrote:
doesn't it seem like there should be a way to denote object
data as transient so that it doesn't get serialized by
Storable, etc?
I'd love that as well. For example, when
At 10:55 PM 12/22/2001, brian moseley wrote:
Apache::Singleton::Server got me thinking about Cache::Cache
and locking again. if i'm going to have a server-global
object, i am going to need to protect against multiple
processes updating it simultaneously, right?
we've already talked about this
to the discussion of what a Perl bean would be like and how
different it should be from Java.
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
At 05:05 AM 12/31/2001, Ryan Thompson wrote:
I've looked at TT (and have heard it's praises sung), but it requires
Perl 5.6.0, which is, unfortunately, not yet stable on all of the
production systems my projects are deployed on. The syntax and
features look about right, though... So it is
At 06:16 AM 1/14/2002, brian moseley wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Sam Tregar wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Well, does this product actually have any users to compete for? GUI
builders usually don't work for anything but the most trivial websites
that could be
Of course, the best authentication system for banking I've seen is
from UBS. They send you a scratchlist of around 100 numbers. Every
time you login you use one of the numbers and cross it off. Very
slick.
Does that really work in practice? That sounds really annoying. Is this for
business
I suppose it depends on what you want out of testing.
Frequently, unit testing is OK in simple applications. But in an
application whose job it is to communicate with a mainframe or back-end
databases, frequently the tests you might perform are based on some
previous persistent state of the
. But is it worth all the extra coding time for those tests? I don't
think so. Not for all APIs.
To each his own I guess.
I agree with tests for some things, just not for all things including not
all APIs.
At 08:59 AM 1/26/2002, Rob Nagler wrote:
Gunther Birznieks writes:
the database to perform a test
.
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
,
Exsight, Insite, HowtoSite - I really do not mind.
Regards - Paul Cotter
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
At 04:50 PM 1/31/2002, brian moseley wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Paul Cotter wrote:
Give it some other marketting name, even if it keeps its
original name in places like this.
didn't you people read perrin's message?
do you think this is the first time this topic has been
discussed? do
At 10:46 PM 3/15/2002, John Saylor wrote:
Hi
( 02.03.15 10:03 - ) Jonathan M. Hollin:
However, I request your comments on this idea: should we have just one
button (helping to develop a distinct identity for mod_perl) or should
we have several (for choice)? It's up to you...
/~stepneys/joke/klingon.htm
|
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
Office: (65) 64791172 Mobile: (65) 96218290
At 12:58 PM 6/14/2002, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Rob Nagler wrote:
I'm not a big fan of O/R. I prefer R/O. But to each their own.
Would one of you mind providing a 1 paragraph definition of each? I am
afraid that I am starting to get lost in the semantic differences of
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
Office: (65) 64791172 Mobile: (65) 96218290
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
Office: (65) 64791172 Mobile: (65) 96218290
At 09:24 PM 7/13/2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
Gunther Birznieks wrote:
I agree! It is great work. It looks really slick.
:)
Unfortunately, the mod_perl guide documentation area has lost
functionality. I wanted to download the latest guide before my 23 hour
flight to the USA (to read on the flight
shared between the two. Preferably,
using files (and not mysql).
Thanks,
Yair Lenga
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
Office: (65) 64791172 Mobile: (65) 96218290
Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote:
Any other thoughts?
Yeah, this is off topic, please label it as such. :)
You would think if they want an anal scripting language they would move to
python not PHP. :)
John Saylor wrote:
Hi
( 02.10.30 03:22 -0500 ) Perrin Harkins:
They didn't make their decision on performance though. They seem to
have been most influenced by the idea that perl
Does it have to be mod_perl in order to help your case?
I gave a talk on Perl being used for webapps for investment banking at
the 1999 Perl Conference and Morgan Stanley allowed a champion of Perl
deliver a keynote at the OReilly Open Source Conference in the year
2000. But neither of us
Nick,
I think you raise valid points that I think Nathan and the reviewers
should take on board when they do this chapter and subsequently review
it.
However...
1) I believe that rather than entirely naysay that some common cookbook
items can be covered in a mod_perl chapter, I would prefer
Stas Bekman wrote:
Hill, Ronald wrote:
It's much simpler than that. You need two sentences:
1) under mod_perl, globals remember their values from the previous
request, so you can cache the connection with:
$dbh ||= myconnect();
But Apache::DBI implements pinging (immediate or timing
If I recall correctly, Jeffrey Baker (author of Apache::Session) wrote
an extremely lucid and well thought out argument about why the way
mod_perl pools connections is just as well as Java in reality.
Try searching for his name in the mod_perl list archives.. I think he
wrote this over a year
Andy Wardley wrote:
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
I am planning to submit a proposal for a introduction talk on MVC in
a web environment.
[...]
Like Perrin I would like feedback on the idea before putting in my
proposal.
I like the sound of it, but I should warn you that I have a personal
Nigel Hamilton wrote:
HI,
I'd really like to see talks on:
1. Web Server Compression - a comparison, between mod_gzip, DynaGzip
Compress etc, pros / cons, SSL compression, and example configurations
2. Application Server Options - a comparison between pure-perl,
Apache/mod_perl, POE,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if telecommuting plus occasional travel for
face-to-face would
sell better than pure telecommuting. Is this done very often
in telecommute
situations?
This is exactly what I hope to propose if the need arises in my situation.
Would love to hear from
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Nathan == Nathan Torkington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nathan Not for two years at least (the duration of the contract with the
Nathan Portland hotel). The San Diego hotel was much more expensive and
Nathan remote, compared to the Portland hotel. I think people are
Stas Bekman wrote:
While we are at the CGI.pm issue, I was thinking that those who stick
with CGI.pm because of its extended all-in-one functionality (request
parsing/ HTML generation), but unhappy about request parsing speed,
could benefit by integrating Apache::Request in CGI.pm to do the
301 - 368 of 368 matches
Mail list logo
