Try this URL, it details a servlet (supersnoop) that can be used to view all
headers in the request + SSL info.
http://java.apache.org/faq/fom-serve/cache/118.html
Hope this helps
/colin
- Original Message -
From: "Miguel Jorge Medeiros de Castro fontes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
> Okay, I tried the open_ssl-0.95a and also a snake-oil certificate with no
> luck. Hell maybe it is a dns problem...it kinda of looks like it, but I
> think it just the server taking forever to push out the content...the max
> speed I was getting was about 500b/s download, with most being
> arou
hi
is it possible to configure apache such as: if the
client has a certificate enter page X and if client
has no certificate enter page Y??
Miguel FOntes
-
Email Enviado utilizando o serviço MegaMail
_
About accessing certificates in a servlet can anyone
inform me if Tomcat works. I have tomcat 3.2.1 running
with apache 1.3.14 and i would like to know if it is
possible to run servlets with certificate access.
Miguel Fontes
-
Email Enviado util
Hi there,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Mads Toftum wrote:
> > I have these settings in my httpd.conf:
> >
> > SSLSessionCache dbm:/www/secure_apache/logs/ssl_scache
>
> Whoa there! Why do you have dbm for your session cache, when you
> compiled with mm support? It should be set to shm (especial
Okay, I tried the open_ssl-0.95a and also a snake-oil certificate with no
luck. Hell maybe it is a dns problem...it kinda of looks like it, but I
think it just the server taking forever to push out the content...the max
speed I was getting was about 500b/s download, with most being
around 30/b/s
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:03:14AM -0500, Colin Devine wrote:
> Hello, I have just installed apache with mod_ssl (and open_ssl and mm as
> well) onto a solaris 5.7 sparc machine. I configured the certificates and
> the install was pretty straight forward. The problem is that the server
> is real
Hello,
I read various FAQ's and some Manuals, but I didn't find
anything about installing a wildcard certificate.
We want install some virtual servers like:
server1.questico.com
server2.questico.com
server3.questico.com
All servers must have SSL-Support. We want install a
wildcard certificat
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:29:54AM -0800, George Walsh wrote:
> If this does not help, please check out the manual page of "bind" and see
> what it states for EINVAL. ON HP-UX it says:
>[EINVAL] The socket is already bound to an address,
>
Could it be your certificate? You can also try a dummy cert for testing.
Just throwing out more ideas, here. ;-)
-Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Colin Devine
>
> Wow..you have no idea how depressed this makes me. Well
Wow, thanks for all of the suggestions everyone. I am installing the
0.9.5a version now. Will let you know how it works out.
--Colin Devine
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David Rees wrote:
> If going back to OpenSSL 0.9.5a doesn't work , you can get a pseudo random
> number generator here:
>
> http://w
Wow..you have no idea how depressed this makes me. Well so much for
going back to Suitespot, now that I know it can work, I feel obligated to
make it work. Thanks for the help.
--Colin Devine
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Wohlgemuth, Michael J. wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Col
> -Original Message-
> From: Colin Devine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> No. We are using the builtin options. Is there a good way to get
> /dev/random or /dev/urandom onto a solaris box.
Just so you know, we are running Apache 1.3.14, mod-ssl 2.7.1, openssl
0.9.6, and mm 1.1.3 on an U
If performance is a problem, I found that using OpenSSL 0.9.6 over OpenSSL
0.9.5a gave a 50% speed boost when using Webbench on my hardware (IRIX
Origin 200 dual-CPU machines).I haven't tested on other hardware (and
only have access to Linux i386 machines).
You can see the original thread her
If going back to OpenSSL 0.9.5a doesn't work , you can get a pseudo random
number generator here:
http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/personen/jaenicke/postfix_tls/prngd.html
OpenSSL 0.9.6 performs better than OpenSSL 0.9.5a, so you may want to try
PRNGD anyway.
-Dave
> -Original Message-
> F
Yes, go to sunfreeware.com and there is a urandom thing on there, also over
at sun.com there is a urandom thing there as well, and over at google.com
you can find a bunch of links to the /dev/urandom fix for your system.
Hope it works man, and good luck!
Austin
-Original Message-
From: C
We are running Stronghold 3.0/Apache 1.3.12 on Solaris 2.6
and have not seen this type of behaviour. We have an
UltraSparc 360 with 2GB memory, and can confirm the speed test
results mentioned earlier today (25-30 KeySigns/second) but
have found negligable differences in performance since turnin
SuiteSpot has a Hacked up SSLEngine with built in routines to specifically
not put the FPU intensive stuff on Sparcs. I installed it as well and It
does NOT perform as well on x86 as it does on Sparcs. That said, I do agreee
after reading some further posts that you have a more distinct problem he
No. We are using the builtin options. Is there a good way to get
/dev/random or /dev/urandom onto a solaris box.
--Colin Devine
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Rich Salz wrote:
> Do you have /dev/random installed?
> __
> Apache Interface
Do you have /dev/random installed?
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL
Hi there, Lutz:
RE Could not bind socket to /var/run/egd-pool: Invalid argument
Hmm, I can only guess, but do you have a /var/run directory into which
the socket can be created?
Yes, /var/run directory was established for this purpose, 755 root,sys
If this does not help, please check out the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Colin Devine
> Here is what I used:
>
> /src/mod_ssl-2.7.1-1.3.14># ./configure --with-apache=../apache_1.3.14
> --with-ssl=../openssl-0.9.6 --with-mm=../mm-1.1.3
> --with-crt=../apache_1.3.14/conf/ssl.
I am willing to try almost anything. Give me a few.
--Colin Devine
Again, thanks for the help.
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David Rees wrote:
> Just for kicks, can you try compiling with OpenSSL 0.9.5a instead of OpenSSL
> 0.9.6?
>
> -Dave
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is what I used:
/src/mod_ssl-2.7.1-1.3.14># ./configure --with-apache=../apache_1.3.14
--with-ssl=../openssl-0.9.6 --with-mm=../mm-1.1.3
--with-crt=../apache_1.3.14/conf/ssl.crt/veri-crt
--with-key=../apache_1.3.14/conf/ssl.key/server.key
Configuring mod_ssl/2.7.1 for Apache/1.3.14
+ Apach
Just for kicks, can you try compiling with OpenSSL 0.9.5a instead of OpenSSL
0.9.6?
-Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Colin Devine
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 10:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: solaris slow wi
To answer the other questions, I used gcc: gcc version egcs-2.91.66
19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release) and I followed the instructions from the
mod_ssl INSTALL file. (I compiled mod_ssl --with apache, openssl, mm and
then I compiles apache) The ssl_engine does show hits, and also shows a
bunch of unc
Something is definately wrong. How did you compile apache/mod_ssl/openssl?
Which compiler did you use?
-Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Colin Devine
>
> Very slow. Like 30 seconds to a min load a 884 byte file. It is a fast
Very slow. Like 30 seconds to a min load a 884 byte file. It is a fast
web server that is also running standard apache, oracle, and a few other
standard unix programs. Specifically it is an Ultra-Sparc II 296 with 512
ram. It is not DNS as our other apache server is fine and the apache
reverse
I'm new to trying to
build my own Apache + mod_ssl. In my last message, I reported that even
with the latest snapshot, ApacheModuleSSL.dll was not being generated, though
the source was in the tree. I compiled it by hand, and then ran the
installr part of Apache's makefile.win. To my surp
How slow is slow? How fast is the machine, is it doing anything else?
Does ssl_engine_log show any hints? How did you compile
apache/mod_ssl/openssl, which what compiler (gcc, cc, etc?)
My first guess would be that the RNG isn't working well or there's some
sort of DNS problem.
-Dave
On T
The only problem I have with that is that we previously had an
installation of Netscape suitespot installed and it was handling the ssl
just fine. Would it then be that mod_ssl is not good with sparc's? If
apache and mod_ssl isn't the solution, what is? Thanks for your help.
--Colin Devine
I searched the
archives for mod_ssl and found the message that said the make process on NT for
mod_ssl 2.7.1 was still broken, and that I needed to get the latest
snapshot. I followed those directions, downloaded the latest snapshot -
and the build still doesn't work. If I look in the Apac
Hello, I have just installed apache with mod_ssl (and open_ssl and mm as
well) onto a solaris 5.7 sparc machine. I configured the certificates and
the install was pretty straight forward. The problem is that the server
is really, really slow. It takes forever to get the smallest pages. Here
is
33 matches
Mail list logo
